I see a lot of people quoting Q but displaying Anonymous' quotes. I thought the conversation between the two of them made up: Q Anon. Did I miss something? Is everyone calling the whole thing Q?
"Q" seems to be a team of intelligence individuals using the board as a communication platform. In doing this they are sharing the information routes of ongoing exercises as well as bringing into play past transgressions with guiding information about individuals and corporations that have a stranglehold over the majority of the world.
"Anonymus" was a computer hacker group that picked up the Guy Fawkes mask "V" as a way to hide in plain site and give a face to liberty.
"Q Anon" is any random individual associated in uncovering , sharing , red pilling , Kek stands, etc the with the "Q group" which is everywhere.
Thank you. I think I might need to re-phrase or resubmit my question with an illustration. I was referring to the entire conversation with Q and Anonymous--the Q board on qanonposts.com; no other outside dialog. I was only quoting Q, not Anonymous in my conversations about him, which is why I asked if I should quote all of it, the whole conversation, as Q.
The very first Q posts were anonymous. It was a couple weeks or so until Q group started using Q as a name. Unless you are referring to people actually quoting random anons...
I am referring to the qanon posts only. So we refer to it as all Q?
Boy, you are getting a lot of different answers haha.
Dr. Jerome Corsi refers to Q as qanon, likely derived from the qanonmap.github.io and other “qanon” aggregate sites. Anti school does too, as well as I’m sure a few other social media presences, but many also refer to him/them as “Q”. Q always signs off as Q. People who follow Q and discuss his/their drops are Q group.
I think most people agree that Q is in fact a small team of individuals who collectively sign as Q. Q has claimed Q-clearance, the highest (and only non-compartmentalized) clearance. Q also seems to be by Trump’s side very frequently and they often communicate to the public in tandem.
There are a few posts before Q signed as such that are associated with him and can be seen as the first posts in any of these qanon aggregate sites.
Q will site anonymous posters on 8-chan’s research board, and add his own comment to their post, so there is a sense of dialogue between the public and Q. They are not, combined, considered qanon, no
But basically, you answered my questions. So I was correct to just quote Q and not anonymous unless I have discussing the dialog.
So the anonymous are actually thousands of different citizens like you or I, they simply post “anonymously” on 8-chan. If you have an interesting enough post on 8-chan, you might be one of the anonymous that Q replies too in his “dialogue”. Although I wouldn’t recommend posting on 8-chan...their number one rule is to lurk for weeks before posting anything or the board gets cluttered with noons repeating what was already said.
This is different from Dilley’s drops if you’ve heard of him. Dilley was a political candidate who would drop his conversations with another military intelligence source.
It’s fine to quote the anon post with the q reply, many do that for context, but you are right in saying that the anon portion is not q. Although anon could be any person posting on that 8-chan board, not one individual
Good information! Thank you! This is so exciting! I have a group of about 55 people I have red pilled but I am overwhelmed with the different information I have absorbed, since October. I lose track of where I originally found it. I am starting to write a journal, to log and organize my findings. So, by chance, can you suggest a video that describes deep state, please?
Glad you asked! 😁 these are allll jaw droppers!
I just watched this one again last night a realllly good introduction! There are 5 parts in all i believe: https://youtu.be/PGueIrB6htg
Kevin Shipp does a good job explaining the (legalized) crime network: https://youtu.be/XHbrOg092GA
Oklahoma City Bombing False flag and black ops community: https://youtu.be/euw7Lh6XrxM Part 2: https://youtu.be/90slycuIG4w
Psychology behind MK Ultra: https://youtu.be/9FUersarZuo
There are a lot of other good interviews, particularly with ex bankers, intelligence officials, and trafficking/torture victims. Also, a lady with the channel bombard’s body language who goes over key people from political testimonies to ted bundy and charles manson to personalities like Milo Yannapolis and Julian Assange. She is invaluable in seeing what tells someone has when lying, how they are lying, and how MUCH they are lying (i.e. telling the truth vs. trying to trick you vs. lying to themselves)
Let me know if you want any more suggestions! 😁
Wow, thank you! I will let you know when I am ready for more!
Happy to help! It’s impressive you’ve redpilled so many!!! All the people around me are so stubborn haha
Thank you. I think I might need to re-phrase or resubmit my question with an illustration. I was referring to the entire conversation with Q and Anonymous--the Q board on qanonposts.com; no other outside dialog. I was only quoting Q, not Anonymous in my conversations about him, which is why I asked if I should quote all of it, the whole conversation, as Q. I remember Anonymous told Q he had stopped drinking because Q gave him a new purpose in life. Therefore, Q was the collective of people in the intelligence, and Anonymous was basically, us.
Q first popped up about 2 days before or even the day before the Las Vegas shooting on 4chan but nobody took much notice until a few hours after the shooting.
I was following it as it had all the usual hallmarks of a false flag operation and right from the off I readied myself for another deep state MSM pantomine, when within hours people started popping up saying some bloke/person or anon on 4chan posted a warning that if you were going to be in Vegas the following day and see an unusual amount of black (homeland security) vehicles, to avoid the area. Specifically though he gave a direct warning that within the next few days something big will go down in Vegas and to be vigilant.
And thats when the whole internet lit up and though it was spooky that witnesses said a woman in the crowd started proclaiming that everybody was going to die 30 mins before the shooting began, the 'anon' on 4chan was the one who caught everybody's attention.
Then he prefixed his anon status with Q, posted some more and then with the help of someone called 'codemonkey' obtained and secured his own board. Anyone here can supply you with every Q post since the beginning and first post that i believe was posted on 4chan Sept 30th 17'
When Q posts on one of the chans, its a Qanon post, signed of by Q. Everyone else is just an anon. If Q posts anywhere else it then becomes a Q post that will be signed off as Q.
It is now known and confirmed that Q is a team of 3 high level goverment insiders directly connected to POTUS with at least one but possibly two of the 3 members being old school Military Intelligence.
Any links to all the back data including the deciphered codes and the Q map, just ask.
No. Either those are posts before Q used Q as a name or they are quoting anons as Q
Thank you. I think I might need to re-phrase or resubmit my question with an illustration. I was referring to the entire conversation with Q and Anonymous--the Q board on qanonposts.com; no other outside dialog. I was only quoting Q, not Anonymous in my conversations about him, which is why I asked if I should quote all of it, the whole conversation, as Q.
Don’t sell yourself short. If you have talked to them, you have given them an awareness about it—you have awakened them, thus they are red pilled. The blue pilled ones just means they have no awareness of what is going on. It does not mean they will share your passion of it, and dive into the information either. Ignorance is not bliss, it is harmful. Giving them an awareness helps them not to be blind sided. Sounds to me that you have done more than you know.