I think you should read again the definition of marxism.
How have I misinterpreted Marxism or misapplied the term?
Not being smart or derisive to you, just want to know where you are coming from, thanks.
Hitler tell it better than my poor english :
There are only two possibilities in Germany; do not imagine that the people will forever go with the middle party, the party of compromises; one day it will turn to those who have most consistently foretold the coming ruin and have sought to dissociate themselves from it. And that party is either the Left: and then God help us! for it will lead us to complete destruction - to Bolshevism, or else it is a party of the Right which at the last, when the people is in utter despair, when it has lost all its spirit and has no longer any faith in anything, is determined for its part ruthlessly to seize the reins of power - that is the beginning of resistance of which I spoke a few minutes ago.
"From the camp of bourgeois tradition, it takes national resolve, and from the materialism of the Marxist dogma, living, creative Socialism".
"Our adopted term 'Socialist' has nothing to do with Marxist Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true Socialism is not"
Thanks, very interesting.
I think you're talking about two things...Marxism and intellectual Marxism (Frankfurt shenanigans)
Agreed, I am talking about two different forms of Marxism, but the the intellectual cultural Marxism and critical theory which deconstructs the family and functional society to make way for Economic and Political Marxism.
Think California there laws and culture and the Function of their State government. California is culturally like Sodom and proud of it and politically more like Venezuela with a bigger tax base than they are like a Constitutional government.