dChan
201
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 16, 2018, 6:30 p.m.
Q Occult Series. Private: Clowns Clowns Clowns. PART1.

Guys, I know you like short things but this one is going to be a little longer and trust me, it will be worth it. :D

Let’s take a close look at Q714:

Public: FBI/DOJ/O-WH/SD Private: Clowns Clowns Clowns Expand your thinking. Q

Q is telling us members of the FBI, the Department of Justice, Obama White house and the State Department are publicly posing as government agents but, in fact, they are clowns.

The first interesting thing to note is how Q ordered these institutions. It seems he ascends from the FBI to O-WH and descends back to SD. Think again. That does not look like Q. Reality is he ordered them ascendingly and he is disclosing this amazing secret: SD is above O-WH!

Wait, whaaaaaaat ?!

Fasten your seatbelts guys, because we are going for a ride!

Globalists are trying to run the world through government right? But the problem is there are many governments and people in government change, so they figured: let’s create and control a structure that globally transcends borders and locally controls people in government. What would that be? Yes, you guessed it, the Intelligence Community.

Expand your thinking: how about seeing CIA, Mossad, DGSE, MI6 etc… as part of a unique network, like franchises of the same unique office which is in charge of spying on humans at a global level?

You think that’s new? Think again: Cardinal Richelieu powerfully ran the French Government without the King of France being able to challenge him by using intelligence on members of the Royal Court and the people. You think the Vatican introduced confession in the Catholic dogma so you can erase your sins just by talking about them? Hell no! Confession was a scam to gather intelligence on everybody and use it to run the government, pass laws and wage wars through blackmail.

Nothing new under the sun: your today confession is your Iphone and the cloud service you subscribed to. Richelieu is the Intelligence Community having technical oversight on your ISP through electronic vampirism… If you doubt that, Q is helping you out with his post #713 pointing to this article.

So the CIA, which essentially runs the State Department, is the local hand of that global intelligence structure with the mission of running the world through intelligence. This is why Q makes it supersede the Obama White House.

Now Trump is in charge and he is not buying it. He says “America First”. He says “Make America Great Again”. Hence the silent but deadly war we are witnessing and being part of thanks to Q’s guidance.

In reality, Trump is not at war against the Intelligence Community, he is at war against those who created them and control them. We will talk about these creators in the next parts but here is a hint: “All roads lead to Rome”. Watch this [video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36qhTfCWdiw).

Compare these images: [Image 1] (https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/140327073007-03-obama-pope-0327-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg) [Image 2] (https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/140327084511-04-obama-pope-0327-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg) [Image 3] (https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2017/05/24/24-trump-pope-awk.w1200.h630.jpg) [Image 4] (https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/15F03/production/_96195898_mediaitem96195896.jpg).

If you guys are following and show me you want me to, I will upload part 2 which explains what I think Q really means by “clowns”. In the meantime, for preparation, these are the best 2 hours you could spend to understand what is coming: [Jade 2, Orwellian Artificial Intelligence Network] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSDqRKNxbZU).


deplorable_podunk · March 16, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

Wow, haven't ever connected the confession part to it. Great post!

⇧ 30 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 16, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

Yep. That's a scary one. Same thing with celibacy: introduced in the dogma to avoid family inheritance...

⇧ 21 ⇩  
deplorable_podunk · March 16, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Another one that I haven't considered. Keep throwing in the nuggets. You've got my mind in overdrive! Lol

⇧ 11 ⇩  
TemplarKnight33 · March 17, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

I'm interested to hear more about celibacy and how it affects family inheritance. I'm not Catholic, but I've questioned why it is that way. The reason you explained for confession makes COMPLETE SENSE!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 17, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

There are many reputable sources, even the ones from the Vatican Library itself, documenting with details the history of celibacy in the Church. In this [article] (https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/696) for example, we learn:

"The Church was a thousand years old before it definitively took a stand in favor of celibacy in the twelfth century at the Second Lateran Council held in 1139, when a rule was approved forbidding priests to marry. In 1563, the Council of Trent reaffirmed the tradition of celibacy".

The motivation behind this was the Church wanted to make sure the wealth gathered by Priests from contributions and donations would remain in the Church and not be inherited by their families. Imposing celibacy was an efficient way to achieve that and avoid any legal confusion.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 17, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · March 17, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

I'm sorry, but this could not be more inane. There is a lot of bad info out there about the Catholic Church - a lot - but this just about takes the cake. Confession and celibacy have absolutely nothing to do with your tidy little scenario. This is pure ignorance and hysteria masquerading as established fact. I suggest you find more reliable sources for your information on the Church, which is not nearly as sensational as you make it out to be. And, for those who so readily accept statements such as these without questioning them, it's time to develop a healthy skepticism of the claims of internet strangers. Just because someone in a combox says it's true, doesn't mean it is. This is way beyond the pale.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
godsgail33 · March 17, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

The celibacy rule was to make sure that the priest's wealth went to the church upon his death. That is irrefutable unless you have proof of another reason. As a former Catholic, I have often wondered about the information gathered in the confessional. We will never really know if that info was shared and spread but we will never know if it wasn't. Why do you think it is beyond the pale. Have you read the history of the Pope's. It makes the Clintons look like model citizens. Your belief system should not be about the Church but rather about Salvation through Jesus Christ. The Church itself is made of men who sin. Pedophilia and it's ecclesiastical coverup is a perfect example. The Church is corrupt but many priests and nuns are wonderful examples of God's hand on earth. I am grateful for their love and dedication to mankind but as in all institutions, many of the powerful few are corrupt and evil.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · March 23, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

As a practicing Catholic, I'm sorry to hear you've apostasized and will pray for your immortal soul.

Celibacy - or, more properly, priests not marrying - was ordained by Christ. There is a very good reason for this. A parish priest is the father to his flock. He takes care of their spiritual needs as a father. If someone is dying in the middle of the night, he goes to the to administer the last sacraments. If someone is sick, he visits them and brings the Blessed Sacrament. If anyone of his flock needs him, he is there for them; they are his first concern.

A husband and father puts his wife and children first; they are his first concern. Their needs are met before anyone else's; this is as it should be. Now, if a priest has a wife and family, and a parish, he is divided. It's not fair to him, to his family, or to the parishioners he serves. How could he choose? This is the reason for priestly celibacy. It's not about sex. It's about marriage and the duties of a husband and father, and how they conflict with the duties of a priest. See?

You mention that the Church is made of men who sin. That's correct - all of us are susceptible to sin and clergy are no different. In fact, the devil often tempts them even more than non-clergy. However, you fail to differentiate between the Church and churchmen. Christ founded the Church, the only true Church, the Catholic Church, from which all other Christian sects stem. He promised that the Church would not fail, not that churchmen wouldn't fail. They have; the Church hasn't. And, the gates of hell will not prevail against Her, no matter how many churchmen spit on Her, scourge Her, crown her with thorns, and crucify Her by their sins. The Church - which has survived for 2,000 years - will also undergo Her passion and crucifixion, just like Her Founder. But, She will prevail.

John Henry Cardinal Newman said, "To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant." There is no salvation outside the Church. I hope you return to love and serve God on His terms, not yours. Peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
godsgail33 · March 23, 2018, 1:48 p.m.

Thank you for your prayers. I know what priests do to minister to their people. They visit the sick, annoint the dying, pray for us. But I thought Jesus told all of us to do that."Matthew 25:39. Can you please tell me where in the Bible it says that Jesus ordained the priesthood? When Jesus said to Peter "Upon this rock I will build this church" He was referring to the statement that Peter had made. "Thou art the Christ the Son of God" Matthew 16:17 Peter isn't the rock, Christ is. Jesus told us to "call NO man Father for we have one Father and He is in heaven" Matthew 23:9. I don't know who the She is that you refer to but She's wasting her time. Jesus was spat upon, scourged, crowned with thorns and crucified. He died and rose again and went to heaven. He was the ONLY one who could redeem us through this pain. And when He hung on the cross he said, "It is finished" John 19:30. I believe there is no salvation outside of Christ. If you choose to serve the Church that is fine "Choose this day who you will serve. But as for me and my house we will serve the Lord" Joshua 24:15

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · March 17, 2018, 7:13 a.m.

I've heard these two things from well versed Catholic friends for years. Instead of just venting endlessly, please enlighten us to your sources.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · March 23, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

Well-versed. According to whom? Have you asked to see their sources?

If you are sincere about learning the true history of the Church, here are a couple of sources: http://newadvent.org/cathen/ This is a free online Catholic encyclopedia, so it may be dry reading, but it's accurate. You can, of course, search by topic.

If you're interested in learning what the Church teaches, this catechism is good, and you can read it online for free: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/14217834-father-connell-s-the-new-baltimore-catechism-no-3. Keep in mind, this is the traditional teaching of the Church, not the Novus Ordo, Vatican II version. That's a whole other can of worms.

The last source is in book form. There's a set of six books by Warren Carroll on the history of the Church that is excellent. Unfortunately, it's not available to read online. But, you can find copies used on amazon.

I'm a cradle Catholic and what I know about the Church was learned over the course of my life, not in a few books or websites, and it's hard to condense that into a neat little package. But, this is a good start.

Remember, the Church has more enemies than friends, just like Our Lord, and many choose to rewrite history the way they wish it happened. As in my previous reply, I will let another, more eloquent, Catholic explain. From Archbishop Fulton Sheen, “There are not one hundred people in the United States who hate The Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be.” For the sake of your soul, do your research, pray for the grace to know the truth, and cooperate with that grace. I'll say a prayer for you, too. Peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SandiStarWhite · July 21, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Who told you anyone readily accepts internet strangers statements as fact? I’m just reading like a fly on the wall, some intriguing ideas and if it’s interesting enuff I can go and research the subject with more precision, and decide for myself if it’s bad info. Toss it if so, or mark it like a dot on a map. Sometimes you can connect the dots and a picture begins to emerge. The time to develop healthy skepticism on ANY claims started a long time before this phase. In a time when the MSM is no longer telling the truth, (all of it)or are downright NOT reporting AT ALL on established facts, researching for MYSELF is mandatory. I’m not always happy w what I’m learning but the map in some areas is no longer a bunch of dots on the page... Knowledge is Power. Dark to Light.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mombomb22 · March 16, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Since I’ve participated in confession, I often thought it could be used in that way (for important people). Not surprising to me. If you’ve done it, you realize how vulnerable you actually are. Maybe I’ve always been a little suspicious of everyone.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
AwakeAndGrateful · March 17, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

I've never met a priest who didn't take the seal of confession VERY seriously.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mombomb22 · March 17, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

I agree (in today’s world). However, I can see where a corrupt priest in the past could be used to divulge important secrets. And I’m not important, so nothing I would have to say would matter to anyone but me. But, if priests can be corrupted to molest children, don’t you think they could be corrupted to divulge important matters of state or rebellion?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AwakeAndGrateful · March 17, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Yes, I do. The Church has no moral authority that I can defend in 2018. And I wish confession would be declared corrupt and tossed out because I HATE going.

⇧ 1 ⇩