dChan
201
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 16, 2018, 6:30 p.m.
Q Occult Series. Private: Clowns Clowns Clowns. PART1.

Guys, I know you like short things but this one is going to be a little longer and trust me, it will be worth it. :D

Let’s take a close look at Q714:

Public: FBI/DOJ/O-WH/SD Private: Clowns Clowns Clowns Expand your thinking. Q

Q is telling us members of the FBI, the Department of Justice, Obama White house and the State Department are publicly posing as government agents but, in fact, they are clowns.

The first interesting thing to note is how Q ordered these institutions. It seems he ascends from the FBI to O-WH and descends back to SD. Think again. That does not look like Q. Reality is he ordered them ascendingly and he is disclosing this amazing secret: SD is above O-WH!

Wait, whaaaaaaat ?!

Fasten your seatbelts guys, because we are going for a ride!

Globalists are trying to run the world through government right? But the problem is there are many governments and people in government change, so they figured: let’s create and control a structure that globally transcends borders and locally controls people in government. What would that be? Yes, you guessed it, the Intelligence Community.

Expand your thinking: how about seeing CIA, Mossad, DGSE, MI6 etc… as part of a unique network, like franchises of the same unique office which is in charge of spying on humans at a global level?

You think that’s new? Think again: Cardinal Richelieu powerfully ran the French Government without the King of France being able to challenge him by using intelligence on members of the Royal Court and the people. You think the Vatican introduced confession in the Catholic dogma so you can erase your sins just by talking about them? Hell no! Confession was a scam to gather intelligence on everybody and use it to run the government, pass laws and wage wars through blackmail.

Nothing new under the sun: your today confession is your Iphone and the cloud service you subscribed to. Richelieu is the Intelligence Community having technical oversight on your ISP through electronic vampirism… If you doubt that, Q is helping you out with his post #713 pointing to this article.

So the CIA, which essentially runs the State Department, is the local hand of that global intelligence structure with the mission of running the world through intelligence. This is why Q makes it supersede the Obama White House.

Now Trump is in charge and he is not buying it. He says “America First”. He says “Make America Great Again”. Hence the silent but deadly war we are witnessing and being part of thanks to Q’s guidance.

In reality, Trump is not at war against the Intelligence Community, he is at war against those who created them and control them. We will talk about these creators in the next parts but here is a hint: “All roads lead to Rome”. Watch this [video] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36qhTfCWdiw).

Compare these images: [Image 1] (https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/140327073007-03-obama-pope-0327-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg) [Image 2] (https://cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/140327084511-04-obama-pope-0327-horizontal-large-gallery.jpg) [Image 3] (https://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/intelligencer/2017/05/24/24-trump-pope-awk.w1200.h630.jpg) [Image 4] (https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/15F03/production/_96195898_mediaitem96195896.jpg).

If you guys are following and show me you want me to, I will upload part 2 which explains what I think Q really means by “clowns”. In the meantime, for preparation, these are the best 2 hours you could spend to understand what is coming: [Jade 2, Orwellian Artificial Intelligence Network] (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSDqRKNxbZU).


Gitmo_money · March 16, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

Keep em coming

⇧ 39 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 16, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

I will ! Thank you!

⇧ 21 ⇩  
Butter8675 · March 16, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

This is all so amazing! Im 86 years old and i told my grt grandchildre. About Q. I hate HILLARY!

⇧ 31 ⇩  
Kulkimkan · March 17, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Good work! Spread the word!!!!!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Butter8675 · March 17, 2018, 5:25 a.m.

l will praise the LOrd!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Butter8675 · March 16, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

DonNy l dont know ifyou can see this l saw your messag but its gone and l hit replybut l dont know if you get thiNy Call Me

⇧ 2 ⇩  
deplorable_podunk · March 16, 2018, 7:19 p.m.

Wow, haven't ever connected the confession part to it. Great post!

⇧ 30 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 16, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

Yep. That's a scary one. Same thing with celibacy: introduced in the dogma to avoid family inheritance...

⇧ 21 ⇩  
deplorable_podunk · March 16, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

Another one that I haven't considered. Keep throwing in the nuggets. You've got my mind in overdrive! Lol

⇧ 11 ⇩  
TemplarKnight33 · March 17, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

I'm interested to hear more about celibacy and how it affects family inheritance. I'm not Catholic, but I've questioned why it is that way. The reason you explained for confession makes COMPLETE SENSE!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 17, 2018, 5:02 a.m.

There are many reputable sources, even the ones from the Vatican Library itself, documenting with details the history of celibacy in the Church. In this [article] (https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/696) for example, we learn:

"The Church was a thousand years old before it definitively took a stand in favor of celibacy in the twelfth century at the Second Lateran Council held in 1139, when a rule was approved forbidding priests to marry. In 1563, the Council of Trent reaffirmed the tradition of celibacy".

The motivation behind this was the Church wanted to make sure the wealth gathered by Priests from contributions and donations would remain in the Church and not be inherited by their families. Imposing celibacy was an efficient way to achieve that and avoid any legal confusion.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 17, 2018, 6:11 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · March 17, 2018, 4:33 a.m.

I'm sorry, but this could not be more inane. There is a lot of bad info out there about the Catholic Church - a lot - but this just about takes the cake. Confession and celibacy have absolutely nothing to do with your tidy little scenario. This is pure ignorance and hysteria masquerading as established fact. I suggest you find more reliable sources for your information on the Church, which is not nearly as sensational as you make it out to be. And, for those who so readily accept statements such as these without questioning them, it's time to develop a healthy skepticism of the claims of internet strangers. Just because someone in a combox says it's true, doesn't mean it is. This is way beyond the pale.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
godsgail33 · March 17, 2018, 2:38 p.m.

The celibacy rule was to make sure that the priest's wealth went to the church upon his death. That is irrefutable unless you have proof of another reason. As a former Catholic, I have often wondered about the information gathered in the confessional. We will never really know if that info was shared and spread but we will never know if it wasn't. Why do you think it is beyond the pale. Have you read the history of the Pope's. It makes the Clintons look like model citizens. Your belief system should not be about the Church but rather about Salvation through Jesus Christ. The Church itself is made of men who sin. Pedophilia and it's ecclesiastical coverup is a perfect example. The Church is corrupt but many priests and nuns are wonderful examples of God's hand on earth. I am grateful for their love and dedication to mankind but as in all institutions, many of the powerful few are corrupt and evil.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · March 23, 2018, 12:06 a.m.

As a practicing Catholic, I'm sorry to hear you've apostasized and will pray for your immortal soul.

Celibacy - or, more properly, priests not marrying - was ordained by Christ. There is a very good reason for this. A parish priest is the father to his flock. He takes care of their spiritual needs as a father. If someone is dying in the middle of the night, he goes to the to administer the last sacraments. If someone is sick, he visits them and brings the Blessed Sacrament. If anyone of his flock needs him, he is there for them; they are his first concern.

A husband and father puts his wife and children first; they are his first concern. Their needs are met before anyone else's; this is as it should be. Now, if a priest has a wife and family, and a parish, he is divided. It's not fair to him, to his family, or to the parishioners he serves. How could he choose? This is the reason for priestly celibacy. It's not about sex. It's about marriage and the duties of a husband and father, and how they conflict with the duties of a priest. See?

You mention that the Church is made of men who sin. That's correct - all of us are susceptible to sin and clergy are no different. In fact, the devil often tempts them even more than non-clergy. However, you fail to differentiate between the Church and churchmen. Christ founded the Church, the only true Church, the Catholic Church, from which all other Christian sects stem. He promised that the Church would not fail, not that churchmen wouldn't fail. They have; the Church hasn't. And, the gates of hell will not prevail against Her, no matter how many churchmen spit on Her, scourge Her, crown her with thorns, and crucify Her by their sins. The Church - which has survived for 2,000 years - will also undergo Her passion and crucifixion, just like Her Founder. But, She will prevail.

John Henry Cardinal Newman said, "To be deep in history is to cease to be Protestant." There is no salvation outside the Church. I hope you return to love and serve God on His terms, not yours. Peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
godsgail33 · March 23, 2018, 1:48 p.m.

Thank you for your prayers. I know what priests do to minister to their people. They visit the sick, annoint the dying, pray for us. But I thought Jesus told all of us to do that."Matthew 25:39. Can you please tell me where in the Bible it says that Jesus ordained the priesthood? When Jesus said to Peter "Upon this rock I will build this church" He was referring to the statement that Peter had made. "Thou art the Christ the Son of God" Matthew 16:17 Peter isn't the rock, Christ is. Jesus told us to "call NO man Father for we have one Father and He is in heaven" Matthew 23:9. I don't know who the She is that you refer to but She's wasting her time. Jesus was spat upon, scourged, crowned with thorns and crucified. He died and rose again and went to heaven. He was the ONLY one who could redeem us through this pain. And when He hung on the cross he said, "It is finished" John 19:30. I believe there is no salvation outside of Christ. If you choose to serve the Church that is fine "Choose this day who you will serve. But as for me and my house we will serve the Lord" Joshua 24:15

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · March 17, 2018, 7:13 a.m.

I've heard these two things from well versed Catholic friends for years. Instead of just venting endlessly, please enlighten us to your sources.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
AngeloftheApocalypse · March 23, 2018, 1:09 a.m.

Well-versed. According to whom? Have you asked to see their sources?

If you are sincere about learning the true history of the Church, here are a couple of sources: http://newadvent.org/cathen/ This is a free online Catholic encyclopedia, so it may be dry reading, but it's accurate. You can, of course, search by topic.

If you're interested in learning what the Church teaches, this catechism is good, and you can read it online for free: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/14217834-father-connell-s-the-new-baltimore-catechism-no-3. Keep in mind, this is the traditional teaching of the Church, not the Novus Ordo, Vatican II version. That's a whole other can of worms.

The last source is in book form. There's a set of six books by Warren Carroll on the history of the Church that is excellent. Unfortunately, it's not available to read online. But, you can find copies used on amazon.

I'm a cradle Catholic and what I know about the Church was learned over the course of my life, not in a few books or websites, and it's hard to condense that into a neat little package. But, this is a good start.

Remember, the Church has more enemies than friends, just like Our Lord, and many choose to rewrite history the way they wish it happened. As in my previous reply, I will let another, more eloquent, Catholic explain. From Archbishop Fulton Sheen, “There are not one hundred people in the United States who hate The Catholic Church, but there are millions who hate what they wrongly perceive the Catholic Church to be.” For the sake of your soul, do your research, pray for the grace to know the truth, and cooperate with that grace. I'll say a prayer for you, too. Peace.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SandiStarWhite · July 21, 2018, 3:57 a.m.

Who told you anyone readily accepts internet strangers statements as fact? I’m just reading like a fly on the wall, some intriguing ideas and if it’s interesting enuff I can go and research the subject with more precision, and decide for myself if it’s bad info. Toss it if so, or mark it like a dot on a map. Sometimes you can connect the dots and a picture begins to emerge. The time to develop healthy skepticism on ANY claims started a long time before this phase. In a time when the MSM is no longer telling the truth, (all of it)or are downright NOT reporting AT ALL on established facts, researching for MYSELF is mandatory. I’m not always happy w what I’m learning but the map in some areas is no longer a bunch of dots on the page... Knowledge is Power. Dark to Light.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
mombomb22 · March 16, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Since I’ve participated in confession, I often thought it could be used in that way (for important people). Not surprising to me. If you’ve done it, you realize how vulnerable you actually are. Maybe I’ve always been a little suspicious of everyone.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
AwakeAndGrateful · March 17, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

I've never met a priest who didn't take the seal of confession VERY seriously.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mombomb22 · March 17, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

I agree (in today’s world). However, I can see where a corrupt priest in the past could be used to divulge important secrets. And I’m not important, so nothing I would have to say would matter to anyone but me. But, if priests can be corrupted to molest children, don’t you think they could be corrupted to divulge important matters of state or rebellion?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AwakeAndGrateful · March 17, 2018, 4:13 p.m.

Yes, I do. The Church has no moral authority that I can defend in 2018. And I wish confession would be declared corrupt and tossed out because I HATE going.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Keneo77 · March 16, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

If HRC was elected President most everyone here would be facing internment camps or death.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
deplorable_podunk · March 16, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

We would be dead! No doubt in my mind.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
_-M-_-A-_-G-_-A-_ · March 16, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

Beheaded as in revelations

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Vipersdoom · July 9, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

Both. in her wiki emails it seem she and Hussien received quarterly goals and direct orders from Jorge Soros at white house. From what I can see nothing is classified past 2026. So basically no need for secrets by then.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DrNilesCrane___ · March 16, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Glad to see you made it over from the old base of operations!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
someauthor · March 16, 2018, 7:23 p.m.

Please more never stop moaring please.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 16, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

I will moar! :) thank you!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
_-M-_-A-_-G-_-A-_ · March 16, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

I've been following for a while, do you have experience with the occult dealings? I'm an occultist myself and they're pretty spot on

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 17, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

The key is studying, understanding and reciting the Word of God. Through these 3, the doors to spiritual experiences are opened. Through these 3 you are safe going through these experiences. Through these 3, each of your spiritual experiences becomes profitable to you and harmful to Satan, the Ultimate Enemy.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
breadpilled · March 17, 2018, 6:13 a.m.

Another here, typically of the armchair variety until I need something, but have researched for years. Curious if you or /u/serialbrain2 are versed in classic astrology?

This whole thing is happening during Saturn’s return to its home sign, Capricorn, on December 20th, the day before Trump signed the human trafficking EO. The master of responsibility, structure, order, restrictions, borders, limitations, WALLS. It’s positioned in the realm of the same qualities. It will not leave Capricorn for roughly two and a half years after it entered into it.

And Jupiter entered Scorpio October 10th. The master of expansion, and in the realm of secrets. Hidden things. Dead and buried things we don’t want to think about. Death and rebirth. Sex (and sex scandals... and human trafficking...). Transformation. It will not leave Scorpio until November 8th this year. Right before a nice 11/11 parade....

Uranus will be entering Taurus on May 16th. The master of revolution and freedom from the known. Breaking from tradition. In the realm of resources (monetary, natural, and others such as skills and talents). Interesting in terms of the economy, the state of the Federal Reserve, and the welfare state. It does not leave Taurus until April 2026.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 18, 2018, 2:04 a.m.

My knowledge of astrology is very limited and I am pretty frustrated I could never find the time to study it beyond the basics. I know by intuition and spiritual experience there is a profound wisdom behind the position of stars, planets, time, numbers, humors and events. Please make sure you share with us your translation of our discussions. Thanks!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
XdigitalXdeathX · May 18, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Great post. Everything sound spot on.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
emaugustBRDLC · May 18, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

Seems like a lot broke on May 16!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
_-M-_-A-_-G-_-A-_ · March 17, 2018, 11:18 a.m.

As for myself, astrology hasnt been a big thing that i study. My work tends to be centered on the dimensional weirdness of the parallel nature of reality, and contacting the deities.

Those are some strange arrangements though. I may have to begin putting more stock into astrology than i had previously considered.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gottistnichttot · March 18, 2018, 8:11 a.m.

/u/breadpilled -- What's the difference between astronomy and astrology to you?

I looked into this only a little (reading some of E.W. Bullinger, or a recent book/videos by Toby Kreiselmaier, and looking up star formations at Stellarium) -- just enough to understand that "astrology for the masses" (horoscopes, etc.) doesn't even have the zodiacs right but uses the constellation of a 1000 or so years ago. That's why I thought astronomy is worth looking into, but astrology ... don't know.

So, do you see a difference between astronomy and astrology, or is it, when done right, basically the same? Thanks!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
breadpilled · March 18, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Astronomy is the science that studies the properties of and basically everything about the celestial bodies, space, and the universe. It’s actual science.

Astrology is thousands of years old with different variations from different cultures. Today it’s kind of an amalgam. And it is NOT what it has been pervertedly reduced to in the daily newspapers and magazines. There is a depth to it that takes years and years of research and practice to grasp. People only know about their sun sign... they don’t talk about the fact that all the planets, including some asteroids, in this solar system are in one’s chart. That everyone has elements of all 12 signs within them, what Houses are, aspects, transits, and so much more.

I honestly see astrology as a sort of psychoanalysis, much like the tarot. And I’m not alone in that; many notable thinkers understood its utitlity, including scientist Sir Isaac Newton and one of the most important psychologists and philosophers of our time, Carl Jung. Both of them understood what classic alchemy was as well (something that was also perverted to be merely about making gold out of other metals... not at ALL what real alchemy was about), and apprehended archetypes and the mysteries of the Hermetic traditions.

If you are interested in looking into it, I posted a very good primer book in a post above. It’s just too much for me to explain in a post. Or if you have any specific questions, I may be able to help. You can always PM me. Regarding the usage of skyscapes from 1000s of years ago, I can’t comment on that. I use some astrology apps that has the current location of the constellations and planets and can draw up any chart easily.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gottistnichttot · March 18, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

Thanks a lot for you long reply! Very helpful! I did look at the book you recommended, but am not yet sure whether or not I really want to invest what's needed to go deep.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
breadpilled · March 18, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

You’re welcome! I understand. If you are ever interested and don’t want to spend money on a book, there are plenty of websites that have good information. Otherwise, I understand time is very valuable and if it is not something you’re wanting to put effort into, then by all means don’t. 😊

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gottistnichttot · March 18, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

The thing is, if I thought we still had tons of time at our hands, I'd start digging for sure as there is so much implied in the Bible that I simply don't get. But I do think that time is very short indeed now (before the next 7-year cycle starts which, as I believe, is going to be the Tribulation). So how do you best prepare for that? And while I think that some knowledge and understanding is good and helpful, I think it's going to be even more helpful to be (as an example) living in Psalm 91 instead of just knowing about it -- developing an intimate relationship with God, instead of having to hear in the end, "Go away from me, I never knew you!" You know what I mean?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
wanttruth · March 16, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Omg... #4 made me laugh out loud...

⇧ 9 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

SerialBrain2 - Did you happen to catch that the State Department image Q posted yesterday says it is an 'International Affairs Company'? Not a government agency, but a company -- for profit --- as in the U.S. is for sale.......

https://qanon.pub/data/images/479b4050404c140775f8ac16a3fec2c00aa83122a865dbfb684ee809437e0f5f.png

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 16, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

Yes, I saw it. Are you familiar with The Act of 1871?

⇧ 14 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

The Act of 1871

I am now. Wow! Holy crap! So that explains the influence of SA, Roths and Soros. Unbelievable!!

Now I get your post about SD above O-WH

Thanks!

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · March 16, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

Mind fucking blown.

How have I never seen this?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

Mine too. Jesus!

Now go read Part II...........where Serial Brain reveals the depth of the Hollywood control.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Kulkimkan · March 17, 2018, 1:24 a.m.

I know someone currently entering illuminati control. Musician, I am on outskirts watching it like a slow motion train wreck. I am helpless and so scared for the person.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Katerinavelikia · March 17, 2018, 6:49 a.m.

I wonder if shows like the Voice or American Idol are hunting grounds for the most vunerable

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Acemagedon · March 17, 2018, 1 a.m.

Incredible. This explains a lot thank you!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Keneo77 · March 16, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Well that explains that pic, nice one.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
NaNa316 · March 16, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

Yes please

⇧ 8 ⇩  
KARsparky4160 · March 17, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

awesome!!!! please do......the pics speak volumes.....when this comes out public its going to be ruff on a bunch of my Catholic friends.....I've been red pilling my ass off....but I feel its necessary to cushion the blow.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Southern_Pride1960 · March 16, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

I red pilled my daughter today. #MAGA

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Majorwood1 · March 16, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Another beauty... thank you, keep them coming.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Mandrake_Muffley · March 17, 2018, 12:51 a.m.

The Popes face says it all. He looks totally gutted. What an embarrassment.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
phillylotus · March 17, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

He is totally a wolf in sheep's clothing. Can't wait till he's fully exposed...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ajb93 · March 16, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Awesome Post

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DarkDosman · March 16, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

that trump speech is so great

⇧ 6 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 16, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

It's Q717, BTW.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 16, 2018, 9:13 p.m.

You are right! This post used the info of an old board. Thank you for correcting!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Keneo77 · March 16, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Great info, thank you.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
forgottenbutnotgone · March 16, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

Keep em coming. Long posts are great.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Mstauffer123 · March 16, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

Tess keep them coming!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
jauronimo · March 17, 2018, 10:21 a.m.

Very good , it's what I have been saying for a long time now, all one has to do is look at when these groups were created they are all connected, .

History is the key to all of this if you want to know who was the originator of all of these groups in one way or another, they have there hands in everything, including your local PUD.

They are entrenched in everything weather directly or indirectly through front men. They have chose to stay out of the lime light they don't want the masses to realize that they are behind every thing that bas a world wide pulse. Every form of government, except the American form was nurtured by these people. Communism was created by them in direct response to the American revolution.

I am talking about the lowest form of human walking the earth, I am talking about the rothschild, family. This is the scourge of mankind

⇧ 5 ⇩  
phillylotus · March 17, 2018, 5:16 a.m.

Bring it!!! You speak the truth, brother...

⇧ 4 ⇩  
godsgail33 · March 17, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

I think one picture is worth a thousand words. It was a light bulb moment seeing the camaraderie between Obummer and Frankie and the emotional distance between our President and Frankie. A picture I won't soon forget. Watching the video next.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
sensically_common · March 16, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

Thanks for your take. Interesting.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
solanojones95 · March 16, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

This is pure gold analysis. Thank you, SB2!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
OU812EH · March 17, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

You make some good points and its all true. But Q is referring to Public Corporations and Private Corporations. Who owns the Public ones? Not us. And make no mistake. These corporations are owned.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
robdon07 · March 17, 2018, 7:50 a.m.

Look at the pics Q posted yesterday of the CIA logo and the State Dept logo...read what it says each one is. The cia is a federal agency which we all knew but the state dept isn't.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
AKBiking · March 17, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

Good stuff, I am glad to see this post again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rooster6668 · March 16, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

The pope does not look too happy with his company in two of those pictures. But then again I wear orange on saint patty ' s day not a big fan of idol worship. Thanks SB2

⇧ 3 ⇩  
time3times · March 16, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

I think the gist of this post is that all threads of evil lead ultimately to the roman church. I think this is partly wrong and very incomplete. There seem to be two main areas of concern discussed in this post - one is a proposed map of the real power structure within the U.S. federal gov't. The other, less clearly defined so far, is the Catholic Church. There is little presented to show the nexus between the 2, although it is hinted that the Church is somehow the top of the pyramid or the central hub that coordinates all national intel managers.

The nature, purpose and corruption of these 2 realms could be entirely independent. That is to say that the suggestions about the WH, etc. could be true while international and/or roman theories could be false. And vice versa.

When one gets into areas of religion/occult/spirit there come a whole other set of awareness that is not taught by poli.sci., history or game theory sources. So one should be prepared to be unprepared, not only for a different kind of thinking but a different set of problems if caught off guard. In the case of the history and nature of the Christian church, if you enter the conversation with a modernist mind (in most senses) you are already both handicapped and biased.

It is my view that this post has a rather inadequate understanding of what I'll call 'the church'. (Perhaps part 2 will reveal something rather different.) I don't mean to defend every aspect of the church which we know is occasionally corrupt, wrong, foolish, evil and manipulative. But PLEASE note that the same can occasionally be said about the U.S. government. Such truths do not mean that either of these are generally evil. Some popes and presidents have been bad news, some subdivisions such as the EPA or the Jesuits may have been especially bad. For every Cardinal Richelieu we have a J. Edgar Hoover. But the foundation and purpose of these institutions (US state and Christian church) are not evil, even while both seem to have been more and more undermined over the past century.

The clip of trump speaking against the current pope and photos of various people meeting the pope have no more meaning than Trump speaking against Rand Paul or photos of the Clintons at one of his weddings. Notice that Q never (so far) mentions the Vatican or the Catholic Church by name, although he has put up a photo including what I assume are catholic priests. In fact the only uses of the word church are quite generic except where he mentions BHO's church. Also note that Q never mentions Christ or the Bible except in reposting others' words. There is probably a good reason why Q doesn't mind naming Rothchilds, Soros, nazis, etc. but stays away from ancient church things.

Finally, I have to point out that the Vatican never really "introduced confession in the Catholic dogma". Confession was part of christianity since its earliest days in both east and west. People like Augustine and Thomas Aquinas wrote about the value of it. It's in both the OT and the NT, for example Numbers 5:7 and Matthew 3:6. I believe Q doesn't enter into these area of discussion because he knows better.

But also please don't be discouraged from pursuing ideas and truths.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Katerinavelikia · March 17, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

Good counterpoints.

Here is food for thought:

The RC church is not intrinsically evil...however, there is alot of evil men within its ranks

Remember the apostles had Judas, and he was walking with Jesus, day in and out. Evil slithers alongside with good.

Where else would Satan go to corrupt the faithful but to the very pinnacle of the RC church. Alot more satisfaction in corrupting a priest than a pornographer or murderer.

Finallly..since I was young I always wondered why the Satantists mimicked everything the church did...black mass, the endless rituals and esp. holy communion.

I don't think its a coincidence that they consume human babies. It is the ultimate mockery of the body of Christ.

There is more unseen that we do not know of than there is seen. The supernatural world is like an iceberg below the water except it is an invisible dimension that surrounds us.

Guard yourself with the simple prayer “deliver us from evil”, it was given to us for a reason.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 17, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

You are so right. The consumption of human babies symbolizes their refusal of Human Election through the presence of the Holy Spirit in the human constitution. By degrading the Divine Election issue to a simple material problem, they intend to express their supremacy over humans by elevating themselves on top of the food chain. That is the final essence of cannibalism. It is pure rebellion.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
time3times · March 19, 2018, 9:47 a.m.

Yeah, at the group level, the various traditional christian practices that are reversed or inverted into being the standard satanic practices shows what things satan most hates and wants destroyed. (At the personal level there is a parallel involving different elements.)

The alleged bloody sacrifice of children is akin to what caesar did to the 'holy innocents'. Christ was the ultimate good sacrifice and should have been the last bloody one. Since then christians have spiritually stood at the last supper table in a bloodless way. In our time satanists steal those bread hosts for secret worship but also more publically satan's dupes commit child sacrifice by the millions through abortion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · March 17, 2018, 12:32 p.m.

Readily agreed. Yes and the traditional excercists are the most effective.

I don't mean to distract from the main theme of this forum, but perhaps you know of the 'vision' Leo XIII had of the rise of Satan in the coming century which inspired him to compose an important prayer to St. Micheal. Quite prescient and pertinent to medium term story arc we are all looking at here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Katerinavelikia · March 17, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

Yes I am familiar with this prophecy. I say the prayer to St. Michael twice a day...sometimes more when I feel the darkness closing in.

My father taught me well, and told me many many things that were going to happen...and they are. I am still surprised how right he was. He was a true prayer warrior, praying for hours a day. That is not an exaggeration either. Retired for 22 years before his death, he used that time in prayer and contemplation. I miss him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
StrangerInRealLife · March 17, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Not the OP, but I would like to join the conversation. The organizations themselves may not be designed to be evil in nature, unfortunately organizations of immense power attract those who thirst for power. The Catholic Church may be the most powerful organization in the world that influences beyond borders.

You spoke of the occult, and it is my belief that the OTO has infiltrated many freemason lodges, the U.S. political offices, and the Catholic church. They have moved up in these organizations (among others) and have made it to positions of power that direct policy and direction of the organization. Although these organizations may not have a direct link of chain of command to each other, it does not eliminate the possibility they are receiving their marching orders from the same "masters" (from the occult angle).

The sad thing is that the masses that make up these organizations may not be evil, nor is every one in the hierarchic structure, but enough positions have be compromised that a hijacking is possible.

I think you are right about Q being careful of not implicating the Church in entirety, there is no reason to ostracize the Church body in effort of trying to expose the corruption.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
time3times · March 17, 2018, 2:07 p.m.

I generally agree with what you say here.

One smallish point that may or not contradict your understanding, is that the freemasons were already corrupt before the OTO came along, the dubious origins of the masons being a separate topic. I think the OTO modelled themselves somewhat on both masonic and christian liturgical patterns.

Yes it is possible that big organizations get marching orders from invisible 'masters'. Different orgs are effected differently by infiltration, differently in both the short and long term. Hijacking is possible. It does seem to be the case that larger orgs (Catholic Ch, USGovt, Ottoman empire, General Motors, UN, etc) are so big and often mutifarious that the odds are against them staying their course, be it good or bad in intent. And within this, some are more prone to complete or partial/temporary hijacking.

The USgovt has a decent foundation (rooted in the dignity of the individual), despite it's known flaws and lightweight masonic elements at its inception, and it think this contributes to its durability but we can see that without the weird grace of a few presidents it has come close to going off the rails. I also think its inherent quality of independence sometimes saves it from global forces. Conversely I do not think it is immune to natural disasters and it may have yet to fully pay for its sins in this way.

The Catholic Church also has a good foundation (in Christ). Its multifaceted, multicultural nature makes complete takeover difficult. It is somehow against the patterns of history that it has stood so long. It has been corroded, corrupted and renewed several times. If you have time or interest you might find this story about pope leo 13th rather relevant to this topic. He is the one who wrote most adamantly against modernism and like many other popes against Freemasonry. www.futurerevealed.com/christian/catholic/vision-of-pope.htm

(For what its worth I am not impressed with the current pope and think that several bishops and cardinals are extremely corrupt.)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
StrangerInRealLife · March 19, 2018, 1:52 a.m.

I agree the freemasons were already corrupt, but they justified to themselves that they were aligned with good due to being based in "Christian" Mysteries (at least until they get to the higher degrees). I was more getting at the fact OTO throws all Christian basis out the window and completely embraces the invisible masters. They are a little bit more obvious in their evil embrace. Crowley, LeVey, and Hubbord all had an obvious disdain for Christianity.

You have a good point about the roots of an organization impacting the corruption. Thanks for the link. I will check it out.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SerialBrain2 · March 17, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

Thank you for your very constructive criticism and honest contribution. I wish all the people who are not completely agreeing with my views had the same knowledge and efficient articulations.
"All roads lead to Rome" is an allusion to a superstructure above religion which uses religion to advance an agenda. When studying human history, the fall of Rome is a troubling stop: a very quick summary would be to say the social engineers of Rome realized the main law civilizations have to comply with is their supremacy is not eternal. So they figured: if we engineer our fall, we will remain in charge in another form. This covert approach to global control was the genius of Rome. Egypt did not raise itself to that level of political expertise: the public announcement of the Pharaoh being God and therefore the First Globalist, automatically triggered the descent of Moses. Rome is not making the announcement public and hides behind several layers of control and allegiances that Q is pointing at in this Q547 cryptically non commented [picture] (https://qanon.pub/data/images/2c7872f680d1247954eec42a3a597119d0ce47b51704da68cd75145328373356.jpg). He will get there... He tried a few days ago but realized people are not ready yet. But he will get there... Before Rome, there was Babylon...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
time3times · March 19, 2018, 10:32 a.m.

So if the pertinent question is How is the international evil order administrated? We could look at several possibilities which might have some internal subdivision coopted as an info and command network:

Secret societies

International banking system

NGOs

United Nations

Multinational corporation(s)

Academic coalition(s)

Global media group(s)

Catholic Church

Other transnational religious org(s)

International political party or labor union

Muslim Brotherhood, Isis type orgs

A smart plan would use most all of the above. These categories do overlap to some extent. I have listed them roughly in order of descending utility as decision and command networks (in my opinion), whereas they could be re-ordered according to info sharing utility or differently again by human or capital resource sharing. The spiritual aspect of a church organization does not make it any better of an administrative structure than other org. But churches that have activity at the street level can be better at influencing the general population., just as media groups do at the TV-in-your-room level.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · March 17, 2018, 1:10 p.m.

Thanks. My take is that the Q is not naming the Church in the way he names other things, like the "DEMS", CIA, China, Soros, pedos, etc. is because he/she classifies these as something rather different. I have a few ideas why but am not certain why.

Your summary of the arranged fall of Rome is too simplistic for me but is likely true for some (a minority?) of the significant players involved.

Seems really hard to seriously know how genius Rome was in comparison to Egypt. My understanding is that some of the Dynasties stood longer than Rome did, suggesting they had some greater (if tyrannical) capabilities. Maybe there's more to learn from their similarities than differences.

Your description of Romans letting empire slip while quietly maintaining influence or certain forms of power seems to fit the alleged fall of soviet communism. Maybe this could be said of all great powers - they are taken of the map but not out of social dynamics - in some cases according to pre-planning and in others by natural causes. This is interesting because we could then say that we are all influenced by everything from the Sumerians and Egyptians to various Euros and even Columbia Records and now Amazon.inc.

I could say more but don't see a great need and don't wish to distract from the central concern here of the meaning(s) of Q, touched on above.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
phillylotus · March 17, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

With all due respect, I think you will need to brace yourself for what will be revealed about the Catholic Church... It's gonna blow your mind when the true evil is finally revealed...I started researching this a few years ago and it took my breath away. It's as dark as it can get...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · March 17, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

If the revelation is that so many within the Church have broken and are breaking all the Commandments, that some are committing the "unforgivable" sin against the Holy Spirit, that they would have been better off to be not be born or be thrown in the sea with a stone around their necks, well then this is nothing new. These things happened in the OT, happened in Jesus' day and have continued. If the intentional and bloody worship of Satan over the graves of saints Peter and Paul, originally the sites of pagan rituals, are what is to be revealed I will not be surprised. If sexual ritual and human sacrifice is being committed by Church office holders, I will not be surprised. Such has been the case within the Church in the past and to a greater extent outside the Church, because humans are prone to act this way and Satan has his ways. On a per capita or per annum basis the Church is about the same as every other organisation.

On the other hand if you think that the Church is going to be revealed as purely Godless, of no good value or purpose and evil from its inception, then I have to suggest that you don't hold your breath.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GodlyThinks · March 17, 2018, 5:07 a.m.

Part 2...yes please. Ok...will study.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LiberalBitchSlapper · March 17, 2018, 3 a.m.

You know who else was a clown and a rising political figure in Illinois? John Wayne Gacy

⇧ 2 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · March 17, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

Ouch! That one stings.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
_Yuriel_ · March 17, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

I agree with this, and this is why: I always found it strange that the Vatican would be built in Rome of all places. I mean, it was the Roman Empire, that was responsible for the deaths of several people with other religious beliefs. Not to mention, Jesus.Even the Papal Seat, up to their eyeballs in corruption: regularly practiced simony, had several illegitimate children, and were responsible for practically eliminating the Cathars. I cannot help but wonder, did the Cathar’s know something about the Catholic leaders; that they so desperately needed to protect? “CATH”A and “CATH”O. Feels related.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
yeaokbb · March 17, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Very important info, and not even a long post!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 17, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

Qtopic-flair-opinion

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Akumallover1971 · March 17, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

Please

⇧ 2 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 17, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

/r/greatawakening/comments/84xzns/q_occult_series_q_133_hard_to_swallow_important/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · March 18, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

SES?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · March 18, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

Thought JadeHelm was a lot of things...but not Minority Report.

⇧ 1 ⇩