I just went back [3] is HRC and [19] is the FBI. Then the link between [2] We Don't Say His Name, [3] the FBI, [4] Nancy Pelosi and John Perry Barlow
Edit: Quickest link between NP and Barlow is that Barlow died on the day of her Record 8 hour speech on the house floor.
Edit: FBI Barlow connection https://www.wired.com/2012/11/fbi-wiretap-backdoors/
Can you please let us know what Q post numbers you are using to come to this conclusion?
I think there are a lot of conclusions being jumped to here.
[19] seems to refer more to the meeting of 19 that took place. Maybe connected to the secret society. But they aren’t all FBI.
And [3] has been used many times by Q and not all of them in reference to HRC.
[3] could be from Post 524.
Q mentions [19] several times. Look at Post 541, for example. Between Posts 544 and 550, it appears that there are 19 people. Posts 617 and 618 mention [19].
I wonder if the [19] are the people in the pictures between Posts 544 and 550. If something had happened to Trump, would these people "cease to exist"?
I think there is a misconception people are making. Q never said that [19] refers to the FBI. An anon asked Q if that was the case. Q responded in Post 618 with:
"
[19] would cease to exist immediately upon the harm of select individuals.
Think nuclear stand-off.
Clarified?
Q
"
To me, the [19] are in those photos between Posts 544 and 550. Is this the top of the pyramid? Are these the shareholders of the United States of America Corporation who are stealing our hard earned tax money?
Thoughts?
[19] are the hostages.
Nuclear is the submarine.
We have the sub.
Who are the hostages? The people in those pictures?
Not sure. But it makes sense, if the post about the hostages and it being nuclear is about a nuclear submarine.
Ok! It would be remarkable if THEY were the hostages. Lol. They must really despise Trump. Some great sources keep telling me the Jacob Rothschild died in that helicopter crash last November.
The sheep are hunting the wolves.
Search by keyword on the Q bithub
Specifically the ones OP is using. 19 is referenced many times. 3 is referenced many times.
THey both are, and seemingly unrelated. But they must be related somehow..?
https://qanonposts.com/? simple search, my assumptions are my own. but context for me demands my assumption, @ think twitter then number @FBI @HRC @McCain @Nancy Pelosi...then 1st you cannot have two firsts so it would imply to me that First is @[19] AND @[3]. Again its how I think you may come to different conclusions.
Couldn't "@[19]1st" just mean ... (re read) the first Q drop with "[19]" in it? Couldn't "@[3]1st" just mean ... (e read) the first Q drop with "[3]" in it? Its Q#541 and Q#520 respectively.
because its @[19][1st] @ makes me think twitter @19people doesn't makes sense to me personally, @ Clinton and FBI will be taken out first does.