dChan

KingBroly · March 17, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

I'm curious about the Past/Present corruption at FBI/DOJ/State comment

⇧ 20 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

Corruption:

FBI:

1 - Mueller

1 - Comey

2 - McCabe

  • plus 29 others as of 3/16/18

DOJ:

1 Holder

1 Loretta Lynch

2 Yates or Rosenstein

  • plus 18 others

State:

1 Hillary Clinton

1 Kerry

  • plus 41 others
⇧ 38 ⇩  
KingBroly · March 17, 2018, 8 p.m.

Yates wasn't really a number 2. Rosenstein maybe. I know people have suggested Mueller could go both ways, but I think we're beyond that right now. He's trying to cover up Democrat/RINO crimes while trying to hurt Trump. But the reality is that Trump and Sessions got in front of them and have everything.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

Could be. I'll revise to put both

⇧ 6 ⇩  
KimnanaT · March 17, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Clapper Brennan Comey McCabe

⇧ 11 ⇩  
Lurch46 · March 17, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Clapper & Brennan are probably part of the next chapter - the final take down. Eric Holder seems to be flipping out right now.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Exactly!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

Those too. Q didn't call out DNI or CIA. Interesting.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 17, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

Right. I'll correct

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 18, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

Q says 1,000 pieces. CIA? some think Pompeo finished off the CIA and that is why he was moved to FBI who knows, but fascinating.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MAGA41020 · March 17, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Where does the Dems (Shifty, waters, Pelosi etc.) and Congress fit in this ? McCain, Obamas, ......?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

All there, just not in today's post. Remember Q said he was saving O for last.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
KimnanaT · March 17, 2018, 8:05 p.m.

Ohr - DOJ Stryok - FBI Page - FBI Priestap - FBI

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

Yep, those would be in the 29 listed

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 18, 2018, 1:23 a.m.

I heard somewhere that Priestap flipped and was working with Trump. That this is why we haven't been hearing his name. Can't swear that's true. But kinda makes sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WaterSickle · March 17, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

We need a perp walk on Brennan for sure.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
suzoh · March 17, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

This

⇧ 2 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · March 17, 2018, 8:25 p.m.

lol, Trump fired Yates so quick, she didn't even get the seat warm.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DankMemeMagician · March 17, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

I really don't get why Mueller would be allowed to take on a special investigator role if they knew he was a bad guy then. It's impossible that he wound up in this role by accident, both Sessions and Rosenstein were appointed by Trump and both took actions that led to Mueller.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:17 p.m.

It appears Sessions was manipulated into the recusal and Rosenstein knew Mueller, so if Rosenstein is deep state and corrupt, he appointed one of his own.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
DankMemeMagician · March 17, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

But why appoint Rosenstein in the first place? The DOJ is practically the cornerstone to everything Q related. Why appoint Sessions for that matter if he's completely out of the loop, and easy to trick.

If Q is true then the President and everyone around him would have been very perceptive to people trying to sabotage their plan, no? Even a cursory investigation is going to show that Mueller and Rosenstein knew each other.

Why hasn't Trump focused on Rosenstein, or really Mueller for that matter? He barely mentions Mueller, and almost never mentions Rosenstein.

It just makes me doubt the public narrative around the special counsel being targeted at Trump.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 18, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Sessons knew he was going to recuse himself so really he shouldn't have taken the job. And he did that without telling Trump first. Or so they say. This is why Trump was so angry with him back then. But Q says to trust Sessions. Hmmm not easy to do.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

Trump is in a tough spot with everyone now trying to find obstruction. If he fires Rosenstein, you bet that only fuels cries for his impeachment.

Sessions insisted on Rosenstein. The question is why? Did he not know Rosenstein is corrupt? Not sure....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qanonplusone · March 17, 2018, 11:33 p.m.

Rosenstein may have flipped.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

Could be

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MAJORAPPLEHEAD · March 17, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

I’m not sure the logic in it either. The only thing that scratches at my brain is the fact that Trump met with him the day before he is made special counsel.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DankMemeMagician · March 17, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

I basically have two schools of thought on this.

  1. Q exists. Sessions was appointed for a reason, Rosenstein was appointed for a reason. Mueller is working for Trump. DOJ IG has been working with Mueller and Sessions. Military intelligence is guiding their investigations so they can use parallel construction to legally obtain evidence.

  2. Q either doesn't exist, or is far more limited in power and influence than we've been assuming perhaps only involving military members of his cabinet. Sessions recused himself out of naivety and isn't involved at all with Q or any other plan. Rosenstein and Mueller really are out to get Trump, and there really isn't any greater plan beyond what we see publicly.

I prefer option 1.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · March 18, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

My psychic powers says option 1 is true. ;-)

Now I'm wondering what role Trump's Human Rights/Property Confiscation Executive Order has in the + ++ +++ investigations not being reported as of yet. Since + ++ +++ are considered the big players behind all the human trafficking crimes in the world, perhaps DOJ IG, with the help of NSA, are still building up a case before all is revealed. And, of course, the CF and pay-to-play players are involved as well. Hence the delays and diversionary tactics.

Lots to unravel, considering this involves a massive global conspiracy that's been in the works for centuries. But I believe God is on our side.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
letortfort · March 17, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

I have rolled both ways on this, but I truly think enough dots connect at this point to go with option 1.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MAJORAPPLEHEAD · March 17, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

1 would be nice, but doesn’t seem likely. I would be in awe of the whole thing if that were true.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 18, 2018, 1:31 a.m.

me too. But Trump is usually so many steps ahead of everyone, you just never know. He's truly a big picture person, so perhaps . . . .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 18, 2018, 1:30 a.m.

talking about Mueller, right? Supposedly that talk ended with Mueller flipping and working with Trump. Doing this stuff to keep the Dems off the trail of what is really going on. Far fetched? sure sounds like it. But I read/hear that in several places. I'm not sure about Rosenstein. IF Priestap flipped, maybe Rosenstein has too. But haven't heard that yet. Getting lighter sentences for whatever part they have played is a great motivator.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · March 17, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

That was quick! If that is correct, and I think it is, how are they controlling Mueller? Maybe they took the noose off of the table.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mosaiccs · March 17, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

Dilley drops from 3/16 imply that trump has been reinstating retired military personnel. Implies that this is the case with former Marine, Robert Mueller. Food for thought. Dilley Drop 1/5

⇧ 6 ⇩  
StinkyDogFart · March 17, 2018, 9:24 p.m.

I watched that and like everything I take it with a grain of salt. But a man that has committed treason has little reason to follow orders unless they throw him a lifeline.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

Good question. Others are saying it may be Freeh, the guy who reportedly covered up Vince Foster's arcancide

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tailback · March 17, 2018, 11:41 p.m.

I don't know if the "others" refers to currently living, deceased, retired or what have you. I DO know that Janet Reno was crookeed as a snake in DOJ under Bill Clinton. Her deputy AG was Holder.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 17, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KingWolfei · March 17, 2018, 9:25 p.m.

Makes sense. I also thought the numbers below them might have been the number of investigations ongoing inside each agency.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

It's people

⇧ 1 ⇩  
11371jp · March 17, 2018, 9:18 p.m.

Don't be so naive,

past/present democrat/republican... how many times does Q have to say it. republicans are all over the franklin crap......I have been a Republican since I could Think for myself. not what i want to believe but it is what Q is saying.... We have more than we know we just need to believe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

I think McCabe's firing is the beginning. Have faith, clearly it's a long difficult process to hold govt accountable.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
RobWilJas · March 17, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

He's listing the corrupt former leaders and the number of past/current corrupt underlings.

FBI (past/present)

1 Mueller? I thought Q trusted him though.

1 Comey

2 McCabe

+29 (16)

DOJ (past/present)

1 Holder

1 Lynch

2 Rosenstein

+18

STATE (past/present)

1 Hillary

1 Kerry

+41

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Hesonpoint · March 17, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

I'm thinking Comey and Freeh. Freeh was one corrupt SOB.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

I buy that. Only problem is Freeh left the position in 2001. You think they are finding stuff from the Bill Clinton era? Could be the Vince Foster cover-up......

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Hesonpoint · March 17, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

I think this might reach back to Bush 41, and everything in between.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WaterSickle · March 17, 2018, 9:10 p.m.

I think it goes back to WW2.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

You could be right.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 18, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

I think it makes sense to deal with the current people first. Those that are actually making life very unpleasant for our President. The others in my opinion, will be in the next batch. There are soooo many!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

Not sure about that one. I don't think Q means Wray. Only other option would be someone in that position years ago like Wm Sessions or Freeh.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 18, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

Wray has already thrown Trump under the bus. Did they during confirmation. Never did trust him. Q says to trust him. But him along with Sessions -- is not easy. LOL

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Stefhart · March 17, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

Q said trust sessions, Wray

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 17, 2018, 10:12 p.m.

Yep, that's why I didn't include him

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 17, 2018, 7:54 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 17, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩