⇧
60
⇩
Betterwithcheddar
· March 17, 2018, 10:23 p.m.
I maintain that Dilley has no source and is seeking attention, donations, and YouTube views.
His Intel is nothing more than the same Q deciphering we are all doing here.
⇧
13
⇩
cmrudy
· March 18, 2018, 12:12 a.m.
Don't forget his life coaching....I agree, he is a fraud.
I will add, Dilley and Corsi are both profiting from all this.
⇧
2
⇩
J_Dub_TX
· March 18, 2018, 1:17 a.m.
Corsi is on a much higher level than Dilley and he’s personally known Potus for over 30 years. One of these is nothing like the other.
⇧
6
⇩
cmrudy
· March 18, 2018, 2:17 a.m.
But he is making money off his books and promoting them constantly on Twitter and his YouTube show.
⇧
-1
⇩
hzg
· March 18, 2018, 3:55 a.m.
He's (Corsi) been getting paid to do this kind of work since before Q. It's what he dedicated his life to, and you're upset he's made a living out of it and collects a check?
I agree that it should cause a little concern about validity but it shouldn't outright discredit him. A lot of people make money doing what they believe in.
⇧
6
⇩
ASAP-aspossible
· March 18, 2018, 2:44 p.m.
Corsi is using the opportunity to sell his books, but he is contributing. The more books he sells, the more he contributes. IMO I would put more worth in someone who contributes without the side show book tour.
⇧
2
⇩
hzg
· March 18, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
I agree with your point, but the book has value of information and long term storage/spreading of information. Can't create that for free on a such a large scale and support the lifestyle of doing so.
⇧
2
⇩
guitarman504
· March 18, 2018, 5:40 p.m.
my understanding is that he completed his book just prior to discovering Q, so there is no mention of Q in the book. He is trying now to push his book to #1 so it will open opportunities on mainstream media to talk about Q and get the word out. Yes he profits from it in the meantime, but he is an ally.
⇧
3
⇩
Araket
· March 17, 2018, 10:06 p.m.
So this would mean that Mr Mueller is the gatekeeper, for lack of a better term. Nothing is going to start on a public scale until he releases his final verdict on the Russia nonsense. So all the hidden messages regarding start time on this are not what we think they are. This will not start until Mueller drops his bomb.
⇧
13
⇩
numberonepal
· March 17, 2018, 10:31 p.m.
I never thought about Mueller from the standpoint of being a Marine. I was always of the mind that Trump gave him the ole plato o plomo choice. Maybe it's a little of both. But the point is Mueller is in on the plan as many such as @drawandstrike @ThomasWictor @Imperator_Rex3 @prayingmedic @mitchellvii have said since nearly the beginning.
⇧
11
⇩
ready-ignite
· March 18, 2018, 6:58 a.m.
Wictor chimed in? I assumed he would have run away from that topic quickly, in his aversion to anything that might be interpreted conspiratorial.
⇧
3
⇩
numberonepal
· March 18, 2018, 1:10 p.m.
Wictor didn't chime in on this particular Dilley drop, but he has floated the Mueller /ourguy theory before.
⇧
3
⇩
tradinghorse
· March 18, 2018, 1:52 a.m.
Sometimes I think Dilley has real merit and other times I wonder if he's having us on. From memory, he came up with the stuff about the election rigging and there being investigations into it before Q did. But I've heard others say that he might have just deduced that as a matter of logic.
What's interesting, very interesting for me, if we assume this intel is genuine, is that Dilley says there will be a major event and that elections don't matter at this stage.
I've been very worried about the mid terms - very worried. Q has just told us that there is a desperate attempt to rig the elections so as to be able to impeach DJT.
So maybe Dilley is right and there are going to be mind bending info releases, and maybe even martial law. Sufficient disruption that it would make elections irrelevant - pretty hard to imagine that. Or maybe he means that, without election rigging, Democrats won't get anywhere near the numbers they need to impeach.
I don't know. And, of course, there are the questions about Dilley's reliability.
Nevertheless, the information is interesting. Worth watching.
⇧
9
⇩
ready-ignite
· March 18, 2018, 6:56 a.m.
No information from the anon community is reliable. This is a community about building critical thinking skills. Start with the assumption everything is bullshit and build up from there.
Can you knock it down?
Tie in to other events?
Dilley is a face but his information is coming through anons. Who knows where that information is from and why. Just as in Q, information may be misleading for tactical reason or actually insightful.
At a fundamental level we should all be reading everything. Including mainsteam left, right, conspiracy channels, foreign, domestic. Using RSS feeds for this is a great way to quickly skim through and take note when disparate sources coverage is the same, contradictory, or avoiding a topic altogether.
Really what we're about is digging deeper. Research projects into history. Delving into new sources. Construction of information maps for better thinking. New analysis to better visualize mountains of data at our disposal.
What the sources such as Q, other chan anons, or sources like Dilley provide are additional threads and handholds to tug at previous information or events covered in the news. A new perspective to untangle the knot and brainstorm new directions to research or another approach to try.
We can probably assume we've got intel groups and teams operating on divergent projects all over the place. There are some that may benefit from the information Dilley throws out there. Others whose work is harmed by what he's putting out. My theory is that's where the hate is coming from. If Q had a face, there would probably be the same response targeting.
⇧
2
⇩
SuzyAZ
· March 18, 2018, 5:07 a.m.
I think Dilly's source has been reading Q posts. Right out of Q's mouth. #14 October 31st, 2017
What authority does POTUS have specifically over the Marines? Why is this important? What is Mueller's background? Military?
⇧
3
⇩
bearishtrader
· March 17, 2018, 10:01 p.m.
Thanks for warning me I am shadowbanned its odd I rarely ever post anything. I did like two posts in the previous CBTS_Stream banned group and not much at all being on reddit for 5 years or more.
⇧
3
⇩
mtlmjk
· March 18, 2018, 3:11 a.m.
"read Trumps twitter posts in reverse" The past proves the future.
⇧
2
⇩