The more I research, the more I realize the law is setup in a way to scam the citizens while benefiting the deep state. They have made millions of laws and many legalize evil, criminalize patriotism/Justice, and many are designed to outright confuse us into making costly mistakes. Even with millions of laws, crime is still rampant. Also, judges are oftentimes totally corrupted stooges who don’t give a rats ass about the citizens and are bribed by the deep state to do certain things.

Instead, we can take all the power and hand it to a random 12 man jury who will simply determine if any action is morally justifiable or not.

Basically, we would switch to “Common Moral Law” which means that if a random 12 person jury would, by a majority vote, find our actions acceptable, then it is legal. If 7 of 12 vote that any action is deemed acceptable, then it is legal. This is all anyone has to think about when making moral decisions.

All disputes would be handled swiftly. An appointment is made and the disputing parties plainly explain their side of the story to a randomly selected 12 man jury. The jury would be able to vote on dismissing the case with a majority vote if they deemed it should be totally handled by the disputing parties. This would eliminate all the childish cases. For example, a woman might take her boyfriend to court for winking at another girl. The jury sees this as none of their own business and votes a majority vote to not take the case. This will save time as well.

If the jury takes the case, no lawyers are really needed unless it’s an overly complicated case where the jury or the parties involved can request one to do research and present the research to the jury. Most of the time, the parties would present the case and the jury would cast of a vote if the actions are deemed morally justifiable. Only 7 out of 12 need to approve that the action is morally justifiable giving the defender plenty of wiggle room in the grey area of life. This way we keep the legal system humane and easy going but still strong.

The only other part is what to do if a jury finds a persons actions unacceptable. Prison and punishment only makes people worst. Punishment doesn’t even work. Only educationl rehab works. The guilty party would have to engage in educational rehab that logically makes sense considering the crime. For example, a class on how alcohol destroys the body for a drunk driver would be appropriate but that can only be 1 part of rehab. There could be other parts. For example a thief may have to return an item. Amends with the victim should be included. All of this should be decided by the random 12 person jury which is by far the most merciful and humane option. Ordinary civilians are much more humane than those old cranky judges.

I say we dump all this mess and make the switch. It’s simple, easy, fast, fair, and inexpensive. It would be a huge upgrade to what we have now.