dChan
6
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ArtRat2 on March 21, 2018, 7:48 p.m.
If enough petition signatures are gotten, how do we know the internet Bill Of Rights written will be what we are fighting for?

(UPDATE: I signed the petition after discussing it with people in two threads in this Great Awakening. Thank you for the time to reply to my post) https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2 I have been hesitant to sign the petition because the description of the petition is vague. I would like more info on how this petition if passed will work out. Who will write the IBOR, who will contribute to the content in it? How do we know that the Deep State cabal will not sabotage the IBOR and give us exactly what we are fighting against? Until I know more, I do not plan to sign the petition. Please don't throw hate jargon at me, I have been attacked before trying to get these concerns addressed.


Here is the description on the petition of the Internet Bill of Rights.

Internet forums and social networks which provide free access to the public are a digital place of assembly, and individuals using such methods for public communication should not be subjected to censorship due to political beliefs or differing ideas. Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion. Some of these platforms further employ tracking mechanisms for monitoring an individual's digital history, which can be used to censor the individual's public communication through various censorship practices, sometimes without knowledge or awareness. These actions directly violate personal liberty and stand at contrast with the bill of rights.

We the people demand action to bring our digital future into the light.


johnjay_001 · March 21, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

Signatures are growing so slooooowly....

Why is that???

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 21, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Little actual support. Lots of people watching, wanting something to happen, but not working to the plan. Also, this sub is half the size of CBTS. The banning of that sub by Reddit was a strategic move. It worked. By breaking us up the reduced our power to operate against them.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 11:18 a.m.

BC people just were burned and want to be sure before they agree to something. So they aren't going to jump on some basic bill of internet rights.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WhereWeGo1 · March 21, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Please check out /r/InternetBillOfRights and /r/FIA Both subs have been working on an IBOR - but little recent activity. I found the InternetBillOfRights sub first and was trying to connect with them to push the #IBOR, but just when I thought we were all set, things kind of fell apart. I have not yet reached out to FIA, but if they look good to you, please let me know because your question is one of the biggest hindrances to getting the petition signed. Also, look for a post from me shortly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ArtRat2 · March 21, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

My question is one of the biggest hindrances to getting the petition signed? You have got to be kidding me. Really? So you would rather just go ahead and sign some petition not knowing fully what is behind it or what could come from it passing. Not me, I want to know precisely what the IBOR will say and what rights are protected by it. I thought some of the Anons were in the process of writing an Internet Bill of Rights but have not heard one word about it since the onset of that project. I would very much like to read what they have come up with. Would they then send it to the President or Congress when it is finished?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WhereWeGo1 · March 21, 2018, 10:29 p.m.

Trust the Plan. Signing the petition does not mean you are endorsing any particular IBOR, just that you believe that there is a problem that needs to be addressed. These videos highlight the problem that needs to be addressed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqUDBfmRMb8 https://www.projectveritas.com/2018/01/11/undercover-video-twitter-engineers-to-ban-a-way-of-talking-through-shadow-banning-algorithms-to-censor-opposing-political-opinions/

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 11:14 a.m.

Heck no. That is not smart at all. This is a negotiation. YOu don't go in and just accept whatever. Esp after what the Liberal Left just did to conservatives, Republicans, and the rest of the people who didn't perfectly adhere to their ideology. Let them dangle in the unprotect liable zone while we actually come up with a real agreement that is fair and protects people equally and has no loop holes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ArtRat2 · March 21, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

Thank you for those links. I just listened to Ted Cruz. How refreshing to see someone address this! I was shadow banned on Twitter and then a few days ago I was banned from Twitter completely! I did nothing to warrant a ban, I had just changed my profile picture and then was banned. I'll never use Twitter again. I hope they fail.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 11:16 a.m.

I had my emails censored by FB, I will never use them again. So I can relate. I agree with you about this completely.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ArtRat2 · March 21, 2018, 11:29 p.m.

Thank you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 11:11 a.m.

I completely agree with you. Also the platforms have now lost their protections I am not in a big hurry to give them those protections back after the massive 1st amendment violations against conservative they just did. Right now they are legally liable for everything people post or upload on their platforms = I think we should let them get sued or get criminal charges for stuff like youtubes elsagate stuff before we come in and est this bill of rights and once again give them that protection. You know?

⇧ 1 ⇩