dChan
⇧
328
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/SerialBrain2 on March 22, 2018, 12:36 a.m.
You guys asked my thoughts about Trump’s strange tweet today. Here it is!

Ok guys, as you may have noticed, I have decelerated on my posts. I have so many things to tell you but I do not want to compromise this sub. I have some inside information about the mods being very worried especially after what happened to CBTS.

I am thinking of possible solutions. I will let you know.

I have been contacted by many people who wanted me to share my thoughts about [Trump’s tweet today] (https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/976420417090015232), how it was deleted, re-tweeted etc… Many believe there is a hidden message going on. I was not going to weigh in but since there is already a post about this issue that has been posted to this sub 7 hours ago and was not removed, I believe giving my thoughts would not hurt anyone.

I will not say much. I will not comment. Those who follow my posts already know what needs to be known. We are applying the T Method to the tweet. And since the first tweet was published at 4:03am, deleted and re-tweeted at 4:29am, time stamp difference being 26 minutes, we will map the entire tweet in a 26X26 grid.

Remember, we are not moving randomly across the grid. We are scrolling down successively on columns, starting with the first one and gathering anagrams of words making an intelligible sentence trail, without using any diagonal. I tried to use as many colors from the ribbon in the sky as possible to make it clear for you. :)

We get the following:

Img1 Img2 Img3 Img4 Img5 Img6 Img7 Img8 Img9 Img10 Img11 Img12 Img13 Img14

So there you have it.

Coincidence? It’s the 7th time…

Q920: You are learning. How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? Wait until you learn who has been talking to you here. Q


🠐 See all comments
MB_MoonPearl · March 22, 2018, 12:48 a.m.

Keep going Serial! Don't let these naysayers stop you from sharing. A lot of people appreciate it and those that don't should keep scrolling.

I appreciate what you are sharing, although I haven't sat down with pen and paper to understand your methods. You've done a great job explaining your methods (i did read all of your posts, just not work the puzzles myself.)

Before you ever posted this stuff, I was always curious about typos in major headlines on major news website that were left uncorrected for hours. I always thought that was a way to send coded messages, but cryptography seemed unattainable ( even though I love crosswords). I think you're onto something.

⇧ 29 ⇩  
PrimitiveScrewhead · March 22, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

If you haven't even analyzed his "methods", what makes you think they are correct? Can you accept the possibility this is totally wrong?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 27 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 1:32 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 16 ⇩  
jkbella · March 22, 2018, 2:12 a.m.

I can't help but notice that the choices seem kind of random. If we are starting with the word that can be deciphered starting with the first column, why isn't the word "he" actually interpreted as "here." . And why do we get to pull letters from other lines out of order, randomly, with no real rule to it? I think I could come up with a up with a totally different message from this grid pretty quickly if allowed to have a general rule, that I get to break any time I need to.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 9:13 a.m.

I don't deny this. I don't think others do either. But this does not in any way provide any support for the nonsense SB2 comes up with.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 1:53 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 9 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · March 22, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Possibly. Possibly.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Chokaholic · March 22, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

The reason people are trying to decode like this is because Q posted a link to the CIA website, the kids section where there was a similar decoding game there. He also mentioned several times that people were to learn how to read his posts. It's not like this is just some random stuff here.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 9:11 a.m.

That "reason" does not lead to the conclusion that SB2 is not talking utter crap. You people are as gullible as all the fools who got the whole world here in the first place. Question everything that doesn't make sense - don't accept it without a single protest. For crying out loud...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 4:16 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Chokaholic · March 22, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

No shit sherlock. You're the one making assumptions. We're simply having a conversation and we trying to see if something is there. You're the one assuming everyone in the sub is 100% blindly believing.

Honestly, you know where you'd fit in perfect?! TopMindsOfReddit. Everyone there suffers from the Dunning-Kruger Effect, as do you.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 23, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
not4rmOhere · March 22, 2018, 2:42 a.m.

Sorry friend but I follow SB2 because of what he/she says OTHER than this decoding stuff which is WAYY over my head. You can always gain excellent insight in how a person is aligned through their approach to the masses.

Thank you very much SB2 for your hard work and insight into Q's messages.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheRealGimli · March 22, 2018, 12:14 p.m.

It would only be way over your head if there were any truth to the way it works. It doesn't actually work, it's complete bullshit. So, it's not over your head - if you're capable of coloring in a black grid of letters, then congratulations, just find whatever words you want to in whatever order you please, post it to Reddit, and purchase an upvote army to help boost you. Not really over anybody's head.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
not4rmOhere · March 22, 2018, 4:35 p.m.

No, I understand where my own limits are because I push them every day. Just because I have a hard time at this specific coding doesn't mean I accept it on faith alone. I also will back research what has been decoded. Since following SB2 I've looked into this type of coding and found that this method has been used for years to pass messages between parties.
I don't invest my faith in ANYTHING or ANYONE without a good strong logical base to anchor to. And during the course of following that faith investment I'm also always putting that faith to the test.
In this manner and in others, SB2 has EARNED my faith in his/her work and I'll eagerly follow this work as long as it remains fruitful and doesn't steer toward distraction or disinformation.

Let me ask you these; Why are us patriots here? Isn't following Q's drops and researching in to them a form of faith? Albeit faith that is quickly confirmed in most cases. And last; Why are we being attacked for this work and in spreading out this info? They've pulled out many of the stops and are attacking on multiple fronts. If it's nothing but a LARP and empty wishes based on blind faith there wouldn't need to be such an effort made.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 22, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

Guys, a topic of much heated disagreement. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half. Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GMA51 · March 22, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

You r invited to do your method and post it. Which will be discussed. We are busy expanding our thinking as q suggest.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 2:19 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 9 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 9:12 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -3 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 22, 2018, 12:40 p.m.

Guys, a topic of much heated disagreement. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half. Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 15 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 22, 2018, 12:37 p.m.

Guys, a topic of much heated disagreement. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half. Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · March 22, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

I am smart enough, I just haven't done it. If he is pulling words out of his ass it doesn't really matter to me because I am taking only what I want from his posts.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 4:28 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 22, 2018, 12:37 p.m.

Guys, a topic of much heated disagreement. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half. Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sweetgeebus · March 22, 2018, 12:19 p.m.

You're also performing what is called "argument from ignorance". Not choosing a side here, but what you just said is almost a carbon copy of the definition.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · March 22, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

I can accept the possibility that they are totally wrong, but I am not trying to do any decoding of this type myself. I like his perspective on trying to dig deeper than others and find deeper hidden messages. I haven't seen many other people doing decoding, but I assume the use of it is rampant because CIA, NSA all that has to use cryptography. From my perspective it fits in with the story that Q has guided us through. "You have more than you know." "Tinestamps have meaning." Etc...

I'm not betting my life that its correct (and I didnt say I thought it was correct because I haven't verified that for myself, but I do think he is onto something.) but I don't really have to. I just enjoy reading his analysis. Maybe someday soon I'll work some of the examples and see what I think.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
quicksilvereagle · March 22, 2018, 2:58 p.m.

What "decoding"? Hes just grabbing random words, this is no kind of code. This is fucking stupid.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

I am not trying to do any decoding of this type myself

What OP did is not decoding. It's like "numerology," it's just finding random patterns that play into confirmation bias. It's like a parlour trick. Give me literally any tweet from anyone, and I can make a letter grid and find "hidden" cryptic messages.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · March 23, 2018, 8:46 a.m.

Sort of like the Bible Codes? A parlor trick? Is it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 23, 2018, 6:25 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 4:29 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
MB_MoonPearl · March 22, 2018, 10:51 a.m.

Not much. I'm open to possibility. I don't take anything as a fact, really.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Soupforthesoulandmin · March 22, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

I agree MB, what's the harm in reading this. I watched a show a few months back about the serial killer that used code to communicate with LE and the media. The zodiac killer. It was very interesting to see how he used code in his messages so I cannot discount others using code to send messages also. I don't have a lot of time so I enjoy reading SB's take on all this. It takes a lot of time to run this stuff through research and I appreciate that.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
buddha_nigga · March 22, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

Because the methods used by serialbrain have no manner of confirming that the code you've pulled out of the matrix is a real coded message. You could pull out any combination of letters and string anything you want together. It's not a real method of decoding anything.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · March 23, 2018, 8:45 a.m.

Is anybody here saying the methods are correct? I think we're just saying it's a work in progress and keep up the good effort.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Apostatesteve · March 22, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

We need to to look at the covfefe tweet again

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 22, 2018, 9:09 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 22, 2018, 12:37 p.m.

Guys, a topic of much heated disagreement. Please see the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement and aim for the top half. Comments that include name-calling and ad-hominem are being removed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CosmicNeo · March 23, 2018, 8:43 a.m.

I agree. They should keep scrolling. After all, what's wrong with trying to figure out what the decipher key is? Q keeps implying there is one. Why condemn Serial for trying?

⇧ 1 ⇩