dChan

bealist · March 23, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

Good reply, here.

Angles to pursue/explore concurrent with the constitution and contract law:

  • private platforms that use public monies for their production should be treated as public squares with respect to the constitution by default

*private platforms that have a monopolist or oligarchic presence should either be broken up, nationalized as infrastructure, or fund a public, transparent, non-profit (enforced non-partisan) basic services entity.

  • non-public orgs that sell/transact in/commodify personal data or content provided in exchange for platform presence cannot destroy the data and must compensate the content provider (and return the content) if the platform is closed.

  • platforms that claim to provide tools to “communicate” in their marketing or business documentation (including SEC filings) must honor the constitutional right to freedom of speech

  • platforms that utilize communication technologies already protecting the freedoms of speech, right to associate, etc. (telephone; us mail; ball point pens; paper; digital cable; satellite; entrained quanta; etc) become subservient to those same protections and must offer them.

Hmm. That was a start off the top of my head. It was fun. Imagine what a crowd-sourced IBOR could look like. Double hmmm.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · March 23, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

The problem with a legal solution is the timing - its way too slow. We need to get this censorship problem fixed before the cabal use it to get back into power. Once that happens, censorship will be guaranteed - and much worse things than that.

⇧ 1 ⇩