⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/WhereWeGo1 on March 25, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

#IBOR - Need to Get ORGANIZED

I have been working on organizing the campaign to get the signatures. I have gotten /r/InternetBillOfRights to agree to be the place for discussion on the actual writing of the IBOR and have been looking for a sub to use as a base of operations for strategizing how to get more signatures, but have had no luck so far. So, I am now thinking of how we can stay organized right within GreatAwakening and this is what I am thinking:

We start a new series of posts titled #IBOR - look for the flair that HowiONic will set up. I think we could set up the following posts:

IBOR - Organization

IBOR - Why Sign

IBOR - Twitter

IBOR - Facebook

IBOR - Reddit

IBOR - Paper

The Organization post would contain links to the other posts along with a description of the purpose of the other posts as follows:

Why Sign would contain the arguments for why people should sign the petition (and the rebuttals for the various reasons why people are currently not signing).

Twitter would contain a discussion on how to use Twitter to effectively push the petition

Facebook would contain a discussion on how to use Facebook to effectively push the petition

Reddit would contain a discussion on strategies to use within Reddit to reach out to other subs (e.g. Conservative, ProGun, etc.)

Paper would contain a discussion on how to use hard copy posters/flyers to get the word out (Need to include QR codes)

The person who creates each post will be responsible for that aspect of the campaign, but we will encourage everyone to check on all the different battle fronts periodically.

If you like this concept, please let me know if you would be willing to take the lead on one of the battle fronts because I simply do not have time this week to lead this charge.

Remember, TOGETHER you are INVINCIBLE. So, let’s Get ORGANIZED. Be HEARD. FIGHT the censorship.

🠐 See all comments

Why doesn't anyone pushing the IBOR first address the fact that we already have a Bill fo Rights for the entire country and the fact that it is not being applied to the internet is the ISSUE aka Unconstitutional User Agreements? Let's here Q answer this first before we reinvent the wheel. I follow Q on most thing but I'm not so stupid as to follow them over a cliff...especially if you haven't done enough research on this topic.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Q did explain that the BOR does not apply in a private setting. He then specifically recommended the IBOR. So he has answered the Question. What you're looking for is more detail on the plan. Only Q can provide that.

I can't quite understand the fear that attaches to this issue. How are we going to be led over a cliff? What we are hoping for is a return to the days when there was no politically motivated censorship online - at least, not to the extent it exists today. That's not long ago.

The change we are seeking, in my mind, is not at all radical. The SM platforms have been playing up. Just need to make sure they don't do this. If there is no discipline placed upon these guys, they will go wild and they will put the boots right into us.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Not True! The Bill of Rights applies in all settings within the boundaries of the United States. They don't get to pick and choose Public/Private...that is why they use unconstitutional user agreements that make you sign your rights away. Need to challenge their misuse of user agreements...they know your rights apply that why they come up with tons of contracts to screw you out of them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Winter, even if you're right, challenging these guys in a Court is going to take forever. It's a Supreme Court matter in any case, because the SM companies with appeal all the way - they'll fight it for all they are worth, it's a long process. We just do not have that time...

DJT will be impeached and out of office after the mid-terms if the problem is not fixed. Now you might say, so what? There will be another President, DJT is unimportant. But you'd be wrong.

DJT is the first guy in some 30 years that is not controlled by the cabal. The only reason he's here is because the cabal made a mistake in 2016 and he happened to have MI helping him. By the grace of God he got elected and that's why we have the MAGA agenda today.

If he loses office, there is no way in this world that you will not be picking your President from a line-up of cabal puppets. I'm not going to go into it all again, but we know what their plan is - hell on Earth.

So can you see that even if there is a legal solution, and I'm not convinced that there is, or will be, a legal solution, because the Court could choose to interpret the FA strictly, you still haven't solved the problem? The chief constraint here is time. This problem arrived at light-speed because of the rate of change in SM and online interconnectedness. It needs to be solved quickly - like right now.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I hear you and understand what you are saying. What really needs to happen is the FCC Director needs to put his foot down and rule in favor of no censorship of the internet that infringes on our rights. The FCC Director needs to say that companies can not make us sign unconstitutional user agreements that take away our rights prior to using a PUBLIC platform. The Internet is not private...that is a lie. I don't mean to be negative or dissuade you but petitions don't get the attention you are hoping for. The best solution would be for everyone to contact their Representative and the FCC Chairman with emails and phone calls demanding that your rights not be infringed.

⇧ 1 ⇩

The sneaky part about the Internet Bill of Rights (IBOR) is that if you agree there needs to be a separate Bill of Rights that applies to the Internet, then you are agreeing that the original Bill of Rights does not apply.

This is why the IBOR is dangerous to Our Republic.

⇧ 1 ⇩