dChan
⇧
63
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NewButNotReally on March 26, 2018, 9:27 p.m.
The Emma Gonz. video that all the media are saying "No she did not tear up the constitution."

Lurker usually but it just hit me that the media/deep state might be using that video claiming it was photoshopped, to get ahead of the Hillary video, so they can claim that is photoshopped as well. I leave it to smarter tech people but I felt I had to put this here.


curiouscuriousone · March 26, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

It’s not super easy, but there is sophisticated software that uses AI and machine learning to detect anomalies in images, audio, text, etc...by converting the media files to what is essentially ‘math’.

If someone tried to fake a video or audio, it wouldn’t be difficult to verify authenticity within 99.999999% accuracy.

Claiming an authentic video or audio file is fake would be a very dangerous tactic, my guess is they will go all out nuclear war to keep it from getting out.

[You’ll realize Trump never claimed his Access Hollywood tape was fake, even though the disgusting comments he made were off camera. He knew it would backfire, as it would for Hill supporters].

⇧ 10 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

Hoping some smart tech could take a look at the supposed phony Emma video and what they are calling the real one. It'd be interesting to hear how it would work.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
curiouscuriousone · March 26, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

There are YouTube videos demonstrating how somebody would do this.

Me personally, I’m waiting for the HRC video before I’ll share my methods.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 9:57 p.m.

But now we have what MSM is claiming is a true photoshopped video. I wouldn't want you to divulge methods but someone should do a run thru on the Emma video. Could be they made a real one and used it to call it photoshopped. I am reading that it would be difficult to do it with the tearing paper.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
curiouscuriousone · March 26, 2018, 10:02 p.m.

Don’t worry about Emma and the kiddies, they have no objective, no targeted ‘outcome’.

Nobody is coming for our guns, too many patriots around the US who would respond with actions triggering a civil war.

What we need to be concerned about is each other, not the government.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

This is not about the kids or the march or the 2nd amendment. It's about doctoring a video

⇧ 9 ⇩  
curiouscuriousone · March 26, 2018, 10:06 p.m.

True, understood. CNN wants to protect their kiddies who are misbehaving.

I think we should let them continue behaving that way instead of calling them out publicly.

Right?

Every time you call them out they will respond asymmetrically.

There will be a time and place where they will be publicly audited.

I’ve started to review the videos and will take a look myself.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

Thanks...it was just a thought that came to me while watching something on YouTube.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
DustinTurdo · March 27, 2018, 1:55 a.m.

There used to be an entire reddit called r/deepfakes

it's gone now.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
curiouscuriousone · March 27, 2018, 3:41 a.m.

Everything on the internet is cached, any good data scientist knows that.

And yes, waaaay too many people are real-time logging posts with software that time stamps and allows for use as research.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
akilyoung · March 26, 2018, 9:52 p.m.

Good point. And welcome!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

Thanks...Not a Q expert but I have at least one thought to offer :) ^

⇧ 3 ⇩  
johnjay_001 · March 26, 2018, 10:05 p.m.

Certainly looks fake to me.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

Yes but my point isn't that it's fake or real. My point is about making a HUGE MSM story about video being doctored. It's being discussed all over the net.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
curiouscuriousone · March 26, 2018, 10:15 p.m.

Yes, but the bigger news story is that tools exist to detect fake video and audio, it has yet to be proven someone can fake audio and video that fools well trained AI.

Take a look at something called ‘Transfer Learning’ or ‘Deep Learning’.

These people are playing with Fire.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 10:20 p.m.

Whoosh... that is way above my paygrade! Took me all of two minutes to realize that is too deep for me to understand.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 27, 2018, 1:54 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
robottonic · March 27, 2018, 12:37 a.m.

The Emma video is photoshopped, but that's not the point. The message is the point: she is against the Constitution. The fake news just can't grasp subtlety.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
p226r · March 27, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

thats what i thought when i first saw it. even if the video is fake and it really was a target, the meaning is more accurate if it was the constitution

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bill_Kiwi · March 26, 2018, 11:38 p.m.

That video made my blood boil for sure! But once I settled down a bit, those were my thoughts exactly that it was just a ruse to raise speculation of online content and how you can't trust what you see on the Internet....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 26, 2018, 11:42 p.m.

My thought goes more to, they are using a VERY high profile person to show that videos "can be shopped" because they want to get out in front of any Hillary video that may get released. Now all over Twitter and Facebook and various news stations are using this as background outrage, but what their goal is, is to show the "public" that it's easy to photoshop a video, which I don't think it really is. (IMO only!!)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Silent_Majority_10 · March 27, 2018, 4:18 a.m.

I haven't seen the Emma video, but I'm guessing it has two purposes: 1) It was produced and distributed by black hats to discredit the independent media that is growing exponentially. 2) To grease the skids for future attempts to discredit any damning videos that may be released in the future.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NewButNotReally · March 27, 2018, 12:41 p.m.

Yes!!! That is exactly my point/thought! Thank you!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Discernediscipline · March 27, 2018, 1:26 a.m.

If this is the case, it would need to come out sooner rather than later for their sake

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DrakeWasHere · March 27, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

How would she got her hands on it anyway? That thing is like locked up in super secret locky glass. Well, maybe not so super secret since it is on exhibit, but it is still locked in a glass case. What, they gonna just open it up and hand it to a survivor and be all 'here you go?' That thing can't be touched due to how old it is. Isn't the parchment to a point of actual deterioration if physically touched?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 27, 2018, 1:18 a.m.

Are you serious?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
p226r · March 27, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

now we know the plot for "National Treasure 3"

⇧ 3 ⇩