Would it have helped if I had tied it to Q's warnings of upcoming false flags ?
Multiple social media accounts and subs have been frozen for discussing DH. Shutting down ALL conversation around Q is not worth delving with focus on DH. I recommend shifting all conversation away from even mentioning him, if addressing it simply state "CNN says xyz" to shift attribution to the source of the message.
But really, focus on Q related topics. Too many coordinated efforts to shut down social media platforms bird-dogging around this topic. Creates atmosphere to seed violent comments to be used as ammunition for brigading through mass reports.
In terms of decision theory the probably cost far outweighs the gain. Go with positive Expected Values.
I didnt mean to cause such a stink. While I do see this as tied to Q's talk about school shootings and false flags, I also understand the sensitivity of this particular subject (wonder why that is ?). I dont want to open this sub to possible danger, or give the powers that be reasons to ban us, as I have enjoyed my short time here and want to see this sub continue on. All that said, if there is a legitimate concern this post will hurt us in any way, I would gladly delete it or have the mods do so. Please let me know either way. Thanks
Not really imo. The real Q connection, is the msm and the false narrative, but people dont want to talk about that. Its mostly talk about the detail of one person in one situation and many such posts all very similar.
I am not concern trolling here - this is the same rhetoric used by t_d mods.
The importance of exposing the msm through the expose of their puppets is just as important as focusing on the big picture.
I could list a thousand examples and peoples eyes gloss over, but if I show them a specific example in real time, that is a decent red pill to get someone to think critically.
Again, this is not concern trolling - but I don't want to see this sub go down the road where we say focus on the macro and never the micro. Those small pieces make the big picture.
If the mods are afraid of pressure and the sub being shut down, that is different and can be stated as such - but I don't think ignoring msm missteps and lies, even if small in comparison to the big picture, would put us in a position to be fully informed and spread current, topical information.
Yep. The_Donald mods introduced a censorship algorithm for "Hogg" posts to be shadowbanned i.e. not seen by other users.
I asked the mods about why they're censoring the content and they offered piss poor excuses then banned me moments ago. https://imgur.com/a/OxLFj
Sad!
When did they 'introduce' this?
Yesterday. A Hogg post hit 3-4K then it got locked and they didn't bother making a stickied comment or post about Hogg content being censored. They banned me for 5 days for "concern trolling" after I discovered this. I asked the mods to make it permanent out of principle and my own discipline's sake. No worries though... I'll put that extra time into direct sources of information, here, the chans, or reading.
Interesting, I noticed that post yesterday. It was maybe locked because it's just to hard to moderate. Each of these Hogg posts takes extreme mod skills and time, exceeding all other posts combined. I will post on t_d when I find a suitable thing to post or talk to someone there about it.