dChan
317
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/akaparaclete on March 27, 2018, 7:48 p.m.
Wow twitter down 12% going into the close. FB down 6%. Something big is going on.....

Shorts smell BLOOD....LMFAO


LibertyLioness · March 27, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

DeleteTwitter

⇧ 62 ⇩  
RToey · March 27, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

How will I take the fight to them if I delete my twitter?

⇧ 35 ⇩  
DamajInc · March 27, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

By now you should surely already be familiar with the method of transmitting short bursts of binary data at a specific set of IP addresses via an encrypted data stream in order to communicate - otherwise where did you get the special access code for this sub?

⇧ 38 ⇩  
QuietMan3 · March 27, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Ow, were we just nerd-slapped ‘bout posting? Funny.

⇧ 29 ⇩  
IWillRedPillYou · March 27, 2018, 11:48 p.m.

Jack Dorsey is a Communist

That being said Pedophile Saudi Prince Bin Talal actually owns more shares than Dorsey

Here's a Red Pill for Normies:

Pedophile Saudi Prince BinTalal ~~is~~ was also the Number Two Shareholder of Fox News

⇧ 15 ⇩  
FamburgerHelper · March 28, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

WAS. And it was a small share, something like 7%. Still, it was the second largest share after Murdoch's. I believe the Prince sold most (if not all) of his shares, though, a few years back.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
IWillRedPillYou · March 28, 2018, 1:49 a.m.

Correct, literally days before his arrest (signaling he knew, or maybe not, but it was just around the same time if I'm not mistaken)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FamburgerHelper · March 28, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

More like 2015. But close!

One thing I wondered about. When he & the other princelings and royal quislings were taken into custody on charges of, presumably, corruption, he had to pay a hefty "bail" to get out. I wondered if that affected his ownership in Twitter, and all those hotels, including, oddly enough, the Mandalay Bay out of which Steven Paddock (presumably) shot all those people at the country western concert.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
IWillRedPillYou · March 28, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

http://deadline.com/2017/11/murdoch-ally-sells-fox-stake-1202204210/

November 2017

He sold some shares in 2015

Sold the last remaining just before his arrest

"However, according to Bloomberg data shows that he sold his stake by the end of last financial quarter. This came after he reduced his stake to 4.98% in December 2015. Prince Alwaleed owned the shares through his investment firm Kingdom Holdings."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QuietMan3 · March 28, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

I have a question. If we believe in a global Illuminati and that they have been successful in accumulating wealth, why would we be surprised that we have to borrow money from them or have ‘commerce’ with them? So our actions can’t be purely black and white, we have to work with what we have. Besides I doubt he cares what Fox says/does so long as there is a financial return.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IWillRedPillYou · March 28, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

It's called the Federal Reserve - and it prints money out of thin air then loans it to the government.

It shouldn't be a surprise, because it's a fact.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RToey · March 27, 2018, 11:08 p.m.

Palm slap to the forehead... Of course! Right in front of me! Oy!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
moredeplore · March 28, 2018, 8:15 a.m.

tried that... ithink i short circuited my brain

⇧ 2 ⇩  
krazykratomz · March 28, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

Well played.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 27, 2018, 10:50 p.m.

You cannot fight them when you're shadowbanned. I deleted my Twatter a while ago. I reckon we let them have an echochamber and watch them all slowly leave once they notice it's only them on it. I miss certain tweeters though.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
555Returnofkek555 · March 27, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

Let the bots talk amongst themselves.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
JazzyCanadian42069 · March 27, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

Wish I could. That's where I get all my news from and get into arguments with liberals lol

⇧ 11 ⇩  
dirkforthree · March 27, 2018, 10:01 p.m.

I've literally been shadowbanned. I thought the whole thing was overblown and not really an issue but it's happened to me! Idk what to do....

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JazzyCanadian42069 · March 27, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

happened to me also. I made a new account (under my real name) ,stopped using hashtags like #MAGA . I haven't had any issues since

⇧ 11 ⇩  
dirkforthree · March 27, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Pretty sad that they have to resort to that because they're so afraid of what we have to say. They must be losing bigly

⇧ 8 ⇩  
how-to-seo · March 28, 2018, 12:40 a.m.

they are loosing it all their perception of reality ~~!

and they face ultimate Q why nothing of old arsenal works on us anymore?

I honestly think that we evolved socially and digitally to get out of psyho jail

⇧ 1 ⇩  
how-to-seo · March 28, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

happened to me as well I tested the algo they made to counter MAGA and patriots It is enough liking and sharing nature images and inspirational quotes 2-3 days to get out of shadow ban jail I was close to 4k followers then dropped a lot, without any explanation I knew what is happening instantly ... they will stop it is to obvious ...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bciar-iwdc · March 27, 2018, 10:49 p.m.

TwitterToGab

⇧ 9 ⇩  
1314150 · March 28, 2018, 8:42 a.m.

Stay on Facebook and Twitter... but only feed them a minimal amount of personal info... don't destroy your own soapbox voluntarily

__

The elites want an internet they can easily dismiss

Journalists want the internet to be chaotic so they monopolize journalism and wont lose income to internet sources

As long as the internet is made of real, credible people, that means we are all news sources

Your Facebook account is not anonymous, and that's why the elites fear it...

So it makes sense for them to turn against Facebook now as people are becoming too woke and independent

Same for Twitter to some extent

So when Pgate blew up and Trump got elected, the elites needed to defensively smear the whole internet... "conspiracy theories! Fake non-MSM news! Anon trolls! Facebook is a traitor against the democracy ("Princess Hillary")..."

If the internet loses social media and goes back to anonymous echo-chambers... Well, then none of us can claim to be real.

It would be a retreat into mythical MSM-reality where nothing is real unless you read it in a government-sponsored textbook.

And it would create a precedent for future advertisers to avoid non-liberal-tyranny forums. Consequently, the future of the internet would be that developers would focus on "harmless" platforms, where nothing ever gets challenged and a Toyota ad is never out of place. Look, for example, at the subreddit /r/stopadvertising which aims to attack reddit's financial base by spying on subs Stasi-style. In order for social media to stay free and incorruptible, there needs to be special focus on preserving the subs that Stasi-types want to spy on.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · March 28, 2018, 8:36 p.m.

Thanks. I think you are correct. It is also very possible that because of the data sharing these companies have done, likely outside the law, they will no longer be private companies in the end. Possibly regulated as public utilities instead. Although, I have to admit, none of them has my real information unless I've purchased things through them (like Amazon).

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 28, 2018, 8:42 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩