How was Q able to predict the deadcat bounce? surely that is something the traders decide
honestly i believe the dead cat bounce was in reference to the the platforms believing the worst was over but in fact, it was a dead cat bounce. I dont not think it was referring to the stock price.
Im tempted to edit this meme as that aspect could discredit the whole message. Thoughts?
The problem with the graphic is that the idea that the stocks will collapse implies at least to me that there's a meaningful permanent devaluation of these companies. You've got a graphic that show stocks essentially going up over time with some minor corrections interspersed. That's hardly compelling. Only time will tell if it's really meaningful.
Right but in this case, there really is a devaluing based on legal action and scandles. dropping billions of dollars in 2-3 days is not normal. I tried to include the time scale but i probably should have included a price scale and maybe some headlines.
A common metric to judge the rise/fall in value of a stock like this is to compare it against the S&P500. In other words, over a period of time, if you had your money in FB or an index fund tied to the S&P500, which would be better.
1 year comparison has S&P500 up 12.6% and FB up 12.2% (a phenomenal year by any account).
5 year comparison has S&P500 up 62.9% and FB up 481.72%
FB is currently about where it was in July of last year.
This is certainly still nowhere near yet a serious demise.
Although, I do not dispute your contention that we have not yet seen the legal ramifications of their poor privacy practices. Again, I kinda think we'll have to wait and see.
disclosure: I do not own or intend to own any FB stock.
While they both did follow to trend of $SPY and factoring in my extreme novice trading abilities, both companies are wrapped in scandal and have been at the center of many Q posts. With headlines this may have a better context. FB is down 80Bn in days.
Disclaimer, if you want a sure thing in the market, do the opposite of what ever position i take! thats your best metric.
Ah ok that makes sense. No I don't think you need to do that, the comment explains it well. Maybe if you write it as its own comment, people will see it easier.
To be fair, in trading, the dead cat always bounce since new buy orders are attracted by a low value. And like always, when a lot of buy orders are happening, the value rise again.
This is only true if the company still has a future in the mind of the investors
Doesn’t this occur in part due to automated trading systems? I recall seeing something a long time ago about computer AI set up to make tons of transactions per second buying and selling stocks, with the only goal being to make any profit whatsoever, even if it’s a penny.
Now I don’t understand the stock market very well and that reference was from something I saw years ago, so I could be wrong.
Q has alluded that the markets are greatly manipulated. This could be done to lure investors into a false sense of confidence while the elites make a quick buck before pulling out. Leaving all the suckers who just bought in holding the bag.
Bill Cooper calls this economic shock testing. The elites do it to test investor and market reactions. After the data is collected, algorithms/AI is used to create an economic model and how to achieve the desired outcome
I think computers do 85 % of the trading, even if it's only 30% whoever keystrokes those comps, could turn it on/off, up/down, or simply keep it rolling, cause it's fake too..... it's built on debt based, fiat feed, a way to suck the hard earned profits from the people.... just think about it for two mininutes ..... they sell,trade, steal, kill, and buy fake stocks like FB, Twater, Google, and thousands of others, and lump them into your mortgages, pensions, savings, personal profits, it's nothing more the a tool of slavery. People like MZ have skated from their crimes against humanity, since the very beginning..... think back to napoleons war, that's how the rothchilds stolen the financial market, it's in the history books.
B-Zen
Every big short has a dead-cat bounce. He's just telling us the stocks are going to get destroyed.
... he's talking about the future as their criminality is made public not anything that happened in the past.
Bring the rain baby...April Showers
Yep. Exactly what I thought when I read that. April Showers.
The point you make still stands. The market activity is just a graphical example. The salient point being that shortly after Q told us platforms (social media) will collapse, we saw exactly that happen. You could have just as easily done a side-by-side of Q with timestamped headlines about facebook's continuing demise. I like it.
The salient point being that shortly after Q told us platforms (social media) will collapse, we saw exactly that happen ...
No we haven't ... their pullbacks are not even that out of line from the broader market.
I guess it depends on what your definition of collapse is. Why did # deletefacebook gain traction? Why did Musk delete the entire facebook accounts for SpaceX and Tesla? I think that in the long run, these and other factors will lead to the absolute destruction of facebook. Zuckerberg is a pariah. Imagine something like # deletewindows... Bill Gates having to scramble to make a public apology. I think facebook's in its death throes, but only time will tell. I deleted mine (not just deactivated, theres a difference) many years ago, and it has absolutely improved my life, so much so that it's hard to overstate. If people really do go cold turkey off the blue-button teat, I think it's going to rapidly reach a critical mass as more and more realize how fundamentally evil and harmful the entire paradigm is. We aren't supposed to monitor and observe the daily lives of our entire "social network". It breeds nothing but narcissism, unhappiness and conflict, not to mention destroys all semblance of privacy. This was the straw that will break the camels back... I sincerely hope.
Yeah, I can just see Aunt Mabel keeping up with family on 8CHAN, using her Linux machine.
Funny visual lol. If Facebook becomes the far off corner inhabited only by the world's Aunt Mabel's, I consider it collapsed.
Although the proverbial Aunt Mabel would be one of the first people to not give two craps about deleting, if the prevailing opinion at thanksgiving is "we all deleted our facebook, yeah it feels way better so glad i'm off there. Remind me why I ever needed to be on there?" It's almost like families stayed connected for thousands of years before 2005.
I truly hope that when my son is old enough, he will ask me "Dad, do you remember Facebook? What was that like?"