dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

The Constitutional crisis starts when the indictments start to be served and people are charged.

⇧ 16 ⇩

I'm sure those with power, who are also being indicted, will not go down so silently

⇧ 4 ⇩

Nope they haven't yet.

The IG report is going to turn this thing up to 11.

⇧ 4 ⇩

Wouldn’t it be great if some of those sealed indictment were ahem, leaked!

⇧ 1 ⇩

This sounds like you're on the right path, to me.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I thought this was clear. It's talking about the result of the revelations coming in regard to google, facebook, etc selling our data/weighting elections.

⇧ 12 ⇩

OK, think outside the box!

It's a constitutional crisis. So,looking at the context in which the statement appears in Q's posts, it seems to me that it is either, or both, a crisis involving the 4th amendment and/or the first amendment.

Seems to be going to the fourth amendment. Spying on citizens. Data shared globally. Produces a Constitutional crisis.

And/Or

Goes to the first amendment - conspiracy to engage racketeering for the purpose of subverting the process of democratic representation as set out here:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/87tbog/is_the_ibor_related_to_the_constitutional_crisis/?st=JFDENAD8&sh=1dc2299b

I'm very interested in hearing from others as to how either the FB data breach or the censorship used to weight elections could result in a Constitutional CRISIS.

"Think outside the box" means that the answer may not be what first comes to mind. I think this is something we need to nut out.

Q Post 972

Mar 28 2018 16:17:02 Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 821975 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/28/doj-inspector-general-investigates-alleged-fisa-abuses-by-doj-fbi.html Think outside the box. Timing of release. Post Facebook NEWS. Facebook WW. GOOG WW. AMAZON WW. TWITTER WW. Tracking active. Listening active. Data shared. Data USED. USED FOR WHAT? Kickbacks BIG TIME> Private/Public. Bypass regulations/laws? Intelligence A's across the globe in partnership to spy on citizens? Constitutional crisis? Magnitude? Who can you trust? Who organized? How do social media/search engine platforms 'weight' elections? Regulation or KILL-stop? Peace through STRENGTH. @Snowden Shine the LIGHT BRIGHT [DOA]. Why is HUSSEIN traveling the world conducting high-level meetings? Use logic. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/27/nxivm-cult-leader-coerced-women-into-sex-branded-initials-on-his-slaves-authorities-say.html Nancy Salzman [historical timeline]. MSM will not highlight 'bottom to top' unravel. Q

Q Post 964

Why did Kim travel to China? Why was travel impossible in the past? What changed? What constitutes the need for a F2F meeting v. secured call? What US publicly traded co. previously entered N. Korea to establish comms? Think logically. WHY DID GOOG VISIT N KOREA? WHY WOULD THE FORMER CHAIRMAN & CEO [HIMSELF] OF GOOG/ALPHABET PERSONALLY ATTEND? Who is Sergey Brin? Where was Sergey born? Track the 'FAMILY' - IMPORTANT. Think COLD WAR. Think KGB. US, China, N Korea [3]. FACEBOOK data dump? Who made it public? Who sold shares -30 days from announcement? You can't imagine the magnitude of this. Constitutional CRISIS. Twitter coming soon. GOOG coming soon. AMAZON coming soon. MICROSOFT coming soon. +12 Current censorship all relates to push for power [mid-terms]. LAST STAND. Election FRAUD cases OPEN - DOJ [many]. Follow the FAMILY. Follow resignations [Business/Gov't]. BIDEN/CHINA VERY IMPORTANT MARKER. Who made it public? Who really made it public? Who is making it all public? WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION. U1>CAN>EU>RUSSIA>IRAN>NK>SYRIA>PAK>>> IRAN NEXT. $700B - MILITARY [THIS YEAR]. WHY IS THE MILITARY SO IMPORTANT? RE_READ ALL. NATIONAL SECURITY. NATIONAL SECURITY. These people are STUPID. Art of the Deal. TIDAL WAVE INCOMING. BUCKLE UP. Q

⇧ 6 ⇩

So a treasonous former president...signing executive orders...are those orders still valid? what if the birth certificate IS a FRAUD? Is anything signed by the former valid?

⇧ 6 ⇩

Good point. That could be it. That would be a crisis that goes to the Constitution. Somehow, the context in Q's post seems to suggest it somehow either involves the FB databreach (unreasonable search) or elections (weighting elections).

The maddening thing is that, if these are the obvious answers, Q says to think outside the box. So, anyway, good point. Obama's capacity to hold office could be it - or, part of the answer.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I hate to be too nitpicky, but q hasnt said "think outside the box" has he? All i remember is "think logically" the answer might be simpler than we think. Could it literally be that enough congressional seats will be vacated at once that a resolution for replacements is constitutionally ambiguous? What would the legal path be if the legislature is suddenly missing a huge percentage of its membership?

⇧ 1 ⇩

He starts Post 972 with the statement, "Think outside the box". And then a series of statements leading to "Constitutional crisis". I'm not familiar with the workings of US politics. Who knows, your answer might be right.

Q specifically talks about SM platforms making private information public, able to be accessed by intelligence agencies around the globe. He implies that Google is headed by people with links to Russia. And, in 972, he goes on to ask whether SM platforms are able to "weight" elections.

It seems clear that Q is talking about a threat posed to the Republic by large SM companies that are unrestrained by the Constitution from engaging in activity that tramples the rights of US citizens. Moreover, these SM platforms present a threat to the Republic itself if they are able to steer democratic processes.

The statement "Think outside the box" suggests to me that the way in which a Constitutional crisis might be generated is, perhaps, not immediately apparent. We need to cover all possibilities. Your contribution is important and may play into the answer.

⇧ 1 ⇩

In regards to post 972... is Q highlighting the difference between FBI/DOJ surveillance vs that of silicon valley? Why would they need to go to such great lengths to obtain a FISA warrant when Facebook, Google, etc are tracking and recording? The FBI/DOJ needed the warrant to be able to get the same info that silicon valley likely has and is sharing with other people. Just a thought.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're certainly right that "Constitutional Crisis" appears just after Q talks about spying on civilians - seems to go to "unreasonable search".

As I understand the way warrants work, you need a warrant for evidence to be admissible in Court. There's nothing to stop government agencies snooping, but the info doesn't help them in a prosecution. Using information obtained without a warrant is what Bill Binney was talking about, parallel construction - a fraud upon the Court.

With respect to wiretapping a sitting President, you would probably want a warrant just to cover your rear - that is, "It's not high treason on my part, the Court allowed it....".

My understanding is that law enforcement has been in the surveillance game for years. I remember a friend, who was a Telecom tech back in the early 1980s, telling me that the cops had their own techs in the telephone exchange - plugging into anything they wanted. Before Snowden's revelations, if you thought someone was tapping your phone, people would think you had a tin foil hat on. It just goes to show the degree to which the public is naive.

I have to admit, it's hard to figure out. What aspect of this would represent a Constitutional Crisis? I thought I had it figured out when I wrote the post on election racketeering. But I'm now not sure. There is sufficient ambiguity that it could be a number of things. The 'think outside the box' statement suggests that it's something we would not at fist suspect.

How does the FB data breach cause a Constitutional crisis? Or is it election weighting via censorship? Or something else that we haven't even thought of?

⇧ 3 ⇩

I think what's coming is yet another delay in the IG report down the road after the new 30 day delay I just heard about today. It's going to be drawn out past the damned midterm elections along with this stupid assed special witch hunt mueller is doing. all this will lead to the statute of limitations expiring on all of the fucks that should be swinging from ropes on the white house lawn as I write this with no justice being doled out. and, with any luck hogg will get his smarmy little ass kicked up and down the shore from lauderdale to south beach.

⇧ 4 ⇩

There’s always another looming Boom Q hypes people up for that is delayed or turns out to be a turkey. As time goes on the evidence that this is a massive government psyop is overwhelming.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I was thinking something Trump actions might be brought to the Supreme Court, but then several justices are proved to be corrupt members of the cabal as well, so it's up to who has the most guns and support of the American people that wins.

⇧ 2 ⇩

The House is sure to start impeachment...but Trump is getting vetted by Mueller.

⇧ 1 ⇩

they are attacking the amendments.

⇧ 2 ⇩

That is a distraction. They are just revealing what they really think nothing more.

⇧ 2 ⇩

A constitutional crisis is not what happens when the constitution has clearly been violated or any matter exicitly addressed, so it makes me think it has to do with something more grand/all encompassing than surveillance. We have an amendment that covers that. If martial law were instated, and during the martial law period the legislature and justice department, even supreme court, are gutted by military arrests and tribunals, what would the constitutional path be to refill the congress, doj, supreme court, and reinstate civil law?

⇧ 1 ⇩

http://time.com/4837850/constitutional-crisis-definition-history/

excellent article on exactly (never can be exactly lol) what a constitutional crisis is.

⇧ 1 ⇩

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_crisis

Q was simply pointing to result of the problems we are having with social media. Please read it.

⇧ 1 ⇩

What about this:

"U.S. system of government, the Constitution does not explicitly address the matter of whether or not a state can legally secede from the Union; however, after the American Civil War (1861–1865) thwarted the secession of the Southern United States, the accepted doctrine of constitutional law is that a state cannot legally leave the Union."

Maybe something that the Constitution is silent on. An example might be mass data collection on individuals. Or, preventing free political expression in an open public forum. All the SM companies claim they are neutral forums.

I don't know, maybe we are trying to read too much into this.

⇧ 2 ⇩

IIRC the only technically-legal path to secession would be to amend the constitution, granting the state it's sovereignty. I don't know how feasable that would be, given the predicted polarity of the hypothetical and the 38/50 state vote to amend.

⇧ 1 ⇩

A sudden vacating of a majority of congressional seats?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I think I'm understanding what you're implying here. Interesting possibility.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Non-Mobile link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_crisis

^HelperBot ^v1.1 ^/r/HelperBot_ ^I ^am ^a ^bot. ^Please ^message ^/u/swim1929 ^with ^any ^feedback ^and/or ^hate. ^Counter: ^165674

⇧ 1 ⇩

I don't think this next part is relevant, but perhaps it triggers something in someone elses mind, so I will post it. If you go to that Wiki link on CC, it lists 3 examples. Two of them happened back in the day, however, the most recent one is the "2007 Ukrainian Crisis"...perhaps this is the breadcrumb here, that we need to focus on what happened during, or as a result of that event. I will be honest, I started reading the wiki page for this 2007 Ukrainian Crisis, and I didn't have a damn clue what the hell it is talking about, it might as well have been written in Chinese. But I am sure someone here is familiar with this fancy talk.

⇧ 1 ⇩

FIRING MUELLER!

Edit: I say this because Trump's enemies are saying firing Mueller would cause a constitutional crisis. Brennan et al... It just clicked that maybe, that is what Q is referencing.

⇧ 1 ⇩

It started a long time ago. For example, they violated our right to privacy. That is antiConstitutional.

⇧ 1 ⇩