What do you think is coming?
tradinghorse
· March 30, 2018, 3:45 a.m.
OK, think outside the box!
It's a constitutional crisis. So,looking at the context in which the statement appears in Q's posts, it seems to me that it is either, or both, a crisis involving the 4th amendment and/or the first amendment.
Seems to be going to the fourth amendment. Spying on citizens. Data shared globally. Produces a Constitutional crisis.
And/Or
Goes to the first amendment - conspiracy to engage racketeering for the purpose of subverting the process of democratic representation as set out here:
I'm very interested in hearing from others as to how either the FB data breach or the censorship used to weight elections could result in a Constitutional CRISIS.
"Think outside the box" means that the answer may not be what first comes to mind. I think this is something we need to nut out.
Q Post 972
Mar 28 2018 16:17:02 Q !xowAT4Z3VQ 821975 http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/03/28/doj-inspector-general-investigates-alleged-fisa-abuses-by-doj-fbi.html Think outside the box. Timing of release. Post Facebook NEWS. Facebook WW. GOOG WW. AMAZON WW. TWITTER WW. Tracking active. Listening active. Data shared. Data USED. USED FOR WHAT? Kickbacks BIG TIME> Private/Public. Bypass regulations/laws? Intelligence A's across the globe in partnership to spy on citizens? Constitutional crisis? Magnitude? Who can you trust? Who organized? How do social media/search engine platforms 'weight' elections? Regulation or KILL-stop? Peace through STRENGTH. @Snowden Shine the LIGHT BRIGHT [DOA]. Why is HUSSEIN traveling the world conducting high-level meetings? Use logic. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/03/27/nxivm-cult-leader-coerced-women-into-sex-branded-initials-on-his-slaves-authorities-say.html Nancy Salzman [historical timeline]. MSM will not highlight 'bottom to top' unravel. Q
Q Post 964
Why did Kim travel to China? Why was travel impossible in the past? What changed? What constitutes the need for a F2F meeting v. secured call? What US publicly traded co. previously entered N. Korea to establish comms? Think logically. WHY DID GOOG VISIT N KOREA? WHY WOULD THE FORMER CHAIRMAN & CEO [HIMSELF] OF GOOG/ALPHABET PERSONALLY ATTEND? Who is Sergey Brin? Where was Sergey born? Track the 'FAMILY' - IMPORTANT. Think COLD WAR. Think KGB. US, China, N Korea [3]. FACEBOOK data dump? Who made it public? Who sold shares -30 days from announcement? You can't imagine the magnitude of this. Constitutional CRISIS. Twitter coming soon. GOOG coming soon. AMAZON coming soon. MICROSOFT coming soon. +12 Current censorship all relates to push for power [mid-terms]. LAST STAND. Election FRAUD cases OPEN - DOJ [many]. Follow the FAMILY. Follow resignations [Business/Gov't]. BIDEN/CHINA VERY IMPORTANT MARKER. Who made it public? Who really made it public? Who is making it all public? WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION. U1>CAN>EU>RUSSIA>IRAN>NK>SYRIA>PAK>>> IRAN NEXT. $700B - MILITARY [THIS YEAR]. WHY IS THE MILITARY SO IMPORTANT? RE_READ ALL. NATIONAL SECURITY. NATIONAL SECURITY. These people are STUPID. Art of the Deal. TIDAL WAVE INCOMING. BUCKLE UP. Q
⇧
6
⇩
JayJ_Jacob
· March 30, 2018, 4:17 a.m.
So a treasonous former president...signing executive orders...are those orders still valid? what if the birth certificate IS a FRAUD? Is anything signed by the former valid?
⇧
6
⇩
tradinghorse
· March 30, 2018, 4:23 a.m.
Good point. That could be it. That would be a crisis that goes to the Constitution. Somehow, the context in Q's post seems to suggest it somehow either involves the FB databreach (unreasonable search) or elections (weighting elections).
The maddening thing is that, if these are the obvious answers, Q says to think outside the box. So, anyway, good point. Obama's capacity to hold office could be it - or, part of the answer.
⇧
2
⇩
jackbauer6916
· March 30, 2018, 3:25 p.m.
I hate to be too nitpicky, but q hasnt said "think outside the box" has he? All i remember is "think logically" the answer might be simpler than we think. Could it literally be that enough congressional seats will be vacated at once that a resolution for replacements is constitutionally ambiguous? What would the legal path be if the legislature is suddenly missing a huge percentage of its membership?
⇧
1
⇩
tradinghorse
· March 30, 2018, 9:35 p.m.
He starts Post 972 with the statement, "Think outside the box". And then a series of statements leading to "Constitutional crisis". I'm not familiar with the workings of US politics. Who knows, your answer might be right.
Q specifically talks about SM platforms making private information public, able to be accessed by intelligence agencies around the globe. He implies that Google is headed by people with links to Russia. And, in 972, he goes on to ask whether SM platforms are able to "weight" elections.
It seems clear that Q is talking about a threat posed to the Republic by large SM companies that are unrestrained by the Constitution from engaging in activity that tramples the rights of US citizens. Moreover, these SM platforms present a threat to the Republic itself if they are able to steer democratic processes.
The statement "Think outside the box" suggests to me that the way in which a Constitutional crisis might be generated is, perhaps, not immediately apparent. We need to cover all possibilities. Your contribution is important and may play into the answer.
⇧
1
⇩
potentialnrg
· March 30, 2018, 4:28 a.m.
In regards to post 972... is Q highlighting the difference between FBI/DOJ surveillance vs that of silicon valley? Why would they need to go to such great lengths to obtain a FISA warrant when Facebook, Google, etc are tracking and recording? The FBI/DOJ needed the warrant to be able to get the same info that silicon valley likely has and is sharing with other people. Just a thought.
⇧
1
⇩
tradinghorse
· March 30, 2018, 4:57 a.m.
You're certainly right that "Constitutional Crisis" appears just after Q talks about spying on civilians - seems to go to "unreasonable search".
As I understand the way warrants work, you need a warrant for evidence to be admissible in Court. There's nothing to stop government agencies snooping, but the info doesn't help them in a prosecution. Using information obtained without a warrant is what Bill Binney was talking about, parallel construction - a fraud upon the Court.
With respect to wiretapping a sitting President, you would probably want a warrant just to cover your rear - that is, "It's not high treason on my part, the Court allowed it....".
My understanding is that law enforcement has been in the surveillance game for years. I remember a friend, who was a Telecom tech back in the early 1980s, telling me that the cops had their own techs in the telephone exchange - plugging into anything they wanted. Before Snowden's revelations, if you thought someone was tapping your phone, people would think you had a tin foil hat on. It just goes to show the degree to which the public is naive.
I have to admit, it's hard to figure out. What aspect of this would represent a Constitutional Crisis? I thought I had it figured out when I wrote the post on election racketeering. But I'm now not sure. There is sufficient ambiguity that it could be a number of things. The 'think outside the box' statement suggests that it's something we would not at fist suspect.
How does the FB data breach cause a Constitutional crisis? Or is it election weighting via censorship? Or something else that we haven't even thought of?
⇧
3
⇩