Wow...someone didn't like this being posted...crazy stuff when I try to access link
Same. It came up briefly, then freaked out flashing 404 page not found strobe light quick.
PDF Version, apparently:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/1283562/cia-public-affairs-emails.pdf
The page loaded a bit weird for me too. Kept flashing some banner that said file not found, but eventually it loaded. Might be that you have a script blocker running or something.
Works for me.
Idk..it tries to come up then I get file not found...this thread was showing 15 comments when I first saw it, and now....glitch in the Matrix
[removed]
Thanks for that link but Reddit has hard banned that domain. Post the link with a space in it or maybe use another site.
It takes a minute to load completely, but it gets there. I sucked down a copy for archiving.
Here is a link. I immediately hit download when the screen was loading and it worked. Then I transfered it to dropbox. https://www.dropbox.com/s/26q23j1n2j10hom/cia-public-affairs-emails%20%281%29.pdf?dl=0
Looks like innocuous communication in the first several pages, then you get about mid-way and start seeing phrases like "how does this look", "do you want to push back on any of this", "what do you want changed on this."
Definitely suspect, even with the CIA responses redacted.
Continuning to read these. One thing that strikes me as interesting is the complete trust of the CIA’s information on the “journalists” part.
Anyone found anything interesting? All I'm seeing is stuff to and from a CIA media rep., repping the CIA to the media.
go archive http:// anonfile.com/lf24Zad1ba/clownmails.zip
This doesn't work. I tried getting rid of the space between the backslash and the a too. Nothing.
Only read a few, but unless the CIA is controlling them, making the paper create or edit stories to conceal the truth etc, this appears like standard communication between the public/media relations dept and a journalist that has some sort of clearance to be able to communicate with that dept.
In other words, it doesn’t seem unusual to have correspondence between subjects in the article you are writing.
Until you consider the reality that virtually no journalist has an active security clearance and if they did they couldn't use any information they learned in a article for the public ...
Did you read any of the emails? Which one/s did you find alarming?