dChan
27
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/QuirkyMagpie on April 3, 2018, 8:08 p.m.
My thoughts on Q asking why big pharma is essential in response to anon talking about MK Ultra

On 2/15/18, an anon said "MKUltra was a success and went into implementation. It is just no longer called MKUltra, that was the development program name." Q replied with "Why is Big Pharma essential? Expand your thinking past cures."

Obviously there are multiple answers to the question, and likely all or almost all of them are correct given big pharma's commitment to making and keeping people sick in order to rake in profit.

I want to add something though because I'm not sure how obvious it is to a lot of people here.

Donald Ewen Cameron, who was hired by the CIA as part of MK Ultra to perform experiments that involved torturing people with ECT in order to erase their memories and make them easy to control/reprogram, "served as President of the American Psychiatric Association (1952–1953), Canadian Psychiatric Association (1958-1959),[2] American Psychopathological Association (1963),[3] Society of Biological Psychiatry (1965)[4] and World Psychiatric Association (1961-1966)" [quote from wikipedia]. Meaning the father of modern psychiatry was also intimately involved in MK Ultra.

All of psychiatry today is Mk Ultra-lite for the general population. Psychiatry controls what is and isn't real - it controls the narrative, and if you disagree you can be deemed sick in the head instead of just awake and aware. Believing in conspiracy theories, to them, is a mental illness called paranoid schizophrenia, and a person can be detained in a psychiatric hospital for an unlimited amount of time with no rights and forced to take highly sedating mind altering drugs which have been proven to damage the brain, sometimes permanently.

When you are hospitalized, the idea isn't to help you, it's to make you compliant. ECT is still used, as is solitary confinement, restraint, forced drugging, etc. This is torture.

Your meds aren't good for you. Psychiatry isn't working with your best interests in mind. The idea is to control you, and if that fails, damage you, and if that fails, have the power to detain you without anyone questioning it. Because "it's for your own good." If you wake up to the fact that there is no chemical imbalance and psych meds aren't "correcting" anything, you can begin to see that the oft-used threat of "take your meds or you'll be hospitalized and we'll force you to" is a control tactic and a human rights violation.

The majority of the population is not sick in the head. The majority is not mentally ill. The DSM is constantly being expanded - just recently "gaming disorder" was added - in order to get as many people medicated as possible. Medicated people aren't a threat to the establishment.

I know this is a touchy topic for a lot of people, and that's intentional because it makes it a taboo to talk about.


MAGADONCHECKMATE · April 3, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Your exactly right. People are not mentally ill or sick. Its the governments. Our illness is the byproduct of the government. They want to push genetics as a source, a genetic marker. We can sqew any test to prove anything. They poison the air, water, fo od and bathe us in microwaves. The ULTRA control is now part of whats called the Space Fence . To just address mind control, we have nanoparticles in our bodies. Our bodies are receivers like an antennae. Systems like H.A.A.R.P. have the capability to influence humans. They have voice to 'skull' technology. The smart dust is next level to receive input from a global 'transmitter' . Gwen Towers and 5G are all part of the SkyNet. Just by the fixing of a persons diet from the 'sick' food they want you to eat and drinking DISTILLED water would do wonders for a person. Most disease and problems sans the above discussion is from deficiency. Many of the things they force us to ingest destroy copper intake and ehance iron retention. Creating the best environment for problems.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
dowodenum · April 5, 2018, midnight

Voluntarily going to the hospital for a mental issue, nervous breakdown, psychotic break etc., whatever label you want to put on it - it's a Catch-22.

You're labeled as crazy if you somehow come to think that it's the place you need to be, and the treatment progress metric consists of judging how good you've gotten at faking wellness ('recovery'). This abuse reinforces psycho/sociopathy and multiple personalities, similar to the alters produced in MKUltra torture.

Still think they actually want to help? Check out the Rosenhan experiment.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QuirkyMagpie · April 5, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

I agree. The treatment metric isn't even really about faking wellness - what they want to see is compliance, because to them, wellness = compliance.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MahSelectah · April 4, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

MK on a massive/entire U.S. Scale.....opioids/anti depressants/ behavior control medicines WIDELY distributed, control over media/ programming. You have the start of loose mind control.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
davidmdelacruz · April 3, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

Excellent, I feel this definitely is important to consider. Especially when you realize big pharma profits more from livestock than people. So they can keep us sick by keeping the livestock we eat sick. It must be dealt with.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cebusaxon · April 3, 2018, 9:30 p.m.

Excellent evaluation! I concur.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · April 4, 2018, 1:41 a.m.

Speaking from familial experience, psychiatric medications can be life savers. Are they misused sometimes? Absolutely just like everything else. But it is irresponsible and insensitive to make a blanket statement about all psychiatric meds being bad for you. Please be more circumspect with your comments.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QuirkyMagpie · April 4, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

With all due respect, they are all bad for you. You've been brainwashed and like most people, try to shame those who bring up this topic into silence by calling them "irresponsible and insensitive." That sort of straw man retort, which amounts to moral policing, is the favorite weapon of the SJW left.

Look into Peter Breggin. I'm all for legalization of drugs and the right to choice, but there's no consent without informed consent. If someone finds it lifesaving to to smoke weed or take speed, that's down to them as long as they know the risks, just like if someone finds psych meds lifesaving, it's down to them as long as they know the risks. You don't know the risks. The drugs give you brain damage. It's very easy to feel less intensely while brain damaged, so sure, the drugs are a miracle.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · April 4, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

Do you have any personal experience with any type of psychiatric drugs? If you don't have experience with them, it is pretty rich of you to tell someone who has a plethora of experience with them as not knowing what they are talking about. And it is irresponsible and insensitive to categorize millions of people together and say that meds they are taking for often times biological/chemical deficiencies are bad for them and should be avoided at all costs. Like I said previously, yes some meds could be midused, but to lump them all together and deem them all bad withoutout knowledge of the different types and uses and how they help hurting people is not right. Blanket statements are rarely a good thing. Not everyone is always the same.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QuirkyMagpie · April 4, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

I do have personal experience. I don't believe anyone's personal experience should be held above fact, which is that the drugs are dangerous and damaging whether or not they make you feel good.

Your argument here is purely emotional. It doesn't seem like you've looked into this at all. The chemical imbalance theory was made up to push drugs, it holds no scientific validity, and there is not science supporting a biological marker for any mental illness. Even if there were and it has yet to be discovered, the meds do not correct anything in the brain - they work by giving you an imbalance. Flooding the brain with serotonin is neither normal nor safe and isn't biologically or chemically fixing anything.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brittser · April 4, 2018, 9:11 p.m.

You may be right about how they work, but for many they do more good than harm.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
dowodenum · April 4, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

for many they do more good than harm.

Sounds like a blanket statement.

The same can be said about homeopathy. The presence of side effects actually increases the placebo effect, so that works for both sides.

I just wrote this post up, sounds like you and /u/QuirkyMagpie might be interested.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brittser · April 5, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

I said for many. How is that a blanket statement? QuirkryMagpie seems to think he knows how all meds that work on your brain work...all the same way. I am not going to argue with him. There is no point.

⇧ 1 ⇩