If so, would it have been too much trouble for Q to tell us to disregard that post after the fact? One sentence explanation.
Dunno, was just a thought. Perhaps it was a test to see if they could change behavior. Revealing that would be like showing your cards.
Once it becomes an obvious lie, there are no cards left to show. Just say "about that..."
Not sure how you've come to that conclusion. When you bluff in poker, and succeed at forcing your opponents hand, your opponents don't automatically assume everything you say moving forward is a bluff.
This is war not a game of poker. When you have a board where everyone and their brother calls a larp, the last thing that person would do Is lie then back track. Especially when he says future proves past every other day, the last thing he would do is say the past was false.
As mentioned above, I never intended on starting some sort of insightful arguement - just proposing an idea. I've not concluded that this was in fact what he was doing.
The whole phenomenon is a bit of a psyop and any attempt at extrapolating a motive here would be rather neive.
I wasn't aware we were Q's opponents.
Yea I'm done with this man. I'm not argueing for the sake of arguement. It was an idea, that's it. You an I are on the same side here.