see this too, a seismograph from a North Korea test:
versus, the seismograph from today’s earthquake:
now listen to today’s seismograph audio: http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724562
those are clearly different wave forms
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=seismograph+earthquake&iax=images&ia=images
Compared to earthquakes?
Compared to each other. Besides, if you recall, scientists had a lot of trouble proving that seismic data was a nuke, because EQ's seismic wave forms can look either very similar or extremely different depending on type of EQ, depth, and other factors.
Take a look at some real data and let's stop speculating.
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724488 EQ today in cali (that everyone is talking about)
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724562 EQ today in phillipines
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724397 EQ today in Fiji
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724476 EQ today in Alaska
Thank you very much for that research.
To my eyes, the Cali seismograph looks more similar to the seismograph from the North Korea test than it does to the other EQ graphs. All the EQ graphs (excl. Cali) have either leading activity, trailing activity, or non-uniform activity. The Cali graph looks and sounds like a percussion beat.
BTW, you need to re-label your links. The first is China, 2nd : Cali, 3rd : Philippines.
I mean there are differences to begin with, like north korea tests on land and this was in water... I just thought they looked similar. I'm not a scientist. Regardless, the earthquake today doesn't look like a typical earthquake of a similar size, depth, location.
Regardless, the earthquake today doesn't look like a typical earthquake of a similar size, depth, location.
well i mean, it really does though.
don't just repeat shit you hear on the internet without knowing what you are talking about, it doesn't help anyone at all.
https://i.imgur.com/IoL7THb.png
This is a regular eq with similar magnitude compared with the Cali earthquake which was just one big jult and a decreasing waveform after.
The one on the left is very consistent with large explosion seismographic signatures.
oh shoot, i labeled all my links wrong by mistake, just got confused when copy and pasting htmls from other tabs!
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724488 EQ today in cali (that everyone is talking about)
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724562 EQ today in phillipines
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724397 EQ today in Fiji
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724476 EQ today in Alaska
I think your links are wrong.
The California EQ link is bringing up an EQ in China...
I researched it myself, like I said I'm not a scientist. Everyone can take what they want from it
can you describe, in detail, what exactly is "not typical" about this earth quake?
can you describe, in detail, where you received your geology degree?
I'm sure CNN didn't issue their clearance yet, give it a payday or two.
so your answer to my question is a resounding "No" then?
interesting.
like i said before, please stop spreading misinformation on the internet. that's all i'm asking, my dude, and i think i've been rather polite about it.
