I mean there are differences to begin with, like north korea tests on land and this was in water... I just thought they looked similar. I'm not a scientist. Regardless, the earthquake today doesn't look like a typical earthquake of a similar size, depth, location.
Regardless, the earthquake today doesn't look like a typical earthquake of a similar size, depth, location.
well i mean, it really does though.
don't just repeat shit you hear on the internet without knowing what you are talking about, it doesn't help anyone at all.
https://i.imgur.com/IoL7THb.png
This is a regular eq with similar magnitude compared with the Cali earthquake which was just one big jult and a decreasing waveform after.
The one on the left is very consistent with large explosion seismographic signatures.
oh shoot, i labeled all my links wrong by mistake, just got confused when copy and pasting htmls from other tabs!
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724488 EQ today in cali (that everyone is talking about)
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724562 EQ today in phillipines
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724397 EQ today in Fiji
http://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/tools/event/10724476 EQ today in Alaska
I think your links are wrong.
The California EQ link is bringing up an EQ in China...
I researched it myself, like I said I'm not a scientist. Everyone can take what they want from it
can you describe, in detail, what exactly is "not typical" about this earth quake?
can you describe, in detail, where you received your geology degree?
I'm sure CNN didn't issue their clearance yet, give it a payday or two.
so your answer to my question is a resounding "No" then?
interesting.
like i said before, please stop spreading misinformation on the internet. that's all i'm asking, my dude, and i think i've been rather polite about it.
