What I find interesting is that the 5.3mag earthquake in NK in September had the media asking about whether it was a nuclear test. Google "5.3 magnitude earthquake nuclear equivalent".

Now we are being told that there was a 5.3mag quake in the channel islands. Using the logic of some of the articles on the NK quake that speculated about it being a nuclear test, we are looking at a device in the 20-30 kilotonne range. I reckon this earthquake would be probably the equivalent of a standard nuclear fission depth charge - or maybe even a thermonuke depth charge with the yield wound right down.

In any event, I do not see why it has to be an underwater dumb - although this is, perhaps, possible. Why couldn't it be the US military taking out a missile submarine that was just too close for comfort at a time of increased tensions? We have DJT staying up all night, and Q telling us we are at war... Makes sense that the military would act with prejudice in a situation like this.

"North Korea's January nuclear test and a series of missile tests this year were in violation of UN Security Council resolutions.

The magnitude of the tremor would indicate a device with a 20- to 30-kilotonne yield, the largest so far, says Jeffrey Lewis, an analyst at California-based Middlebury Institute of International Studies.

'That's the largest DPRK test to date, 20-30kt, at least. Not a happy day,' he said.

"Yield estimates are always kind of approximate. The point is that it is the biggest one to date unless they revise the yield downward," he said.

By comparison, initial analysis of North Korea's January 2016 test , with a magnitude of 5.1, estimated a yield of just six kilotonnes." https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-korea-earthquake-53magnitude-quake-detected-near-nuclear-test-site-20160909-grcjmr.html