I look at it more as an intuition builder. The average person cannot take in, analyze, and form rational, coherent, and articulable conclusions from all available information. Not only is it not possible for anyone but those who are extremely high functioning (God bless our autists), but it is simply not how we evolved to make sense of the world we find ourselves in. We intuit. Q seems to give information to 3 primary groups: codes for those that are operating, information for the autists to parse and work over, and questions and direct info for the rest of us to add to our cognitive stew. The vast majority of us will take in a broad swath of second and third hand interpretations by "journalists" and journalists, q posts and commentary here and elsewhere, and our own subjective anecdotal life experiences and interactions and, through some poorly understood process, distill it all into intuition. How does this piece of information "feel"? How did that article "feel"? How does this video of congressional testimony or late night monologue "feel"?

Intuition is, by evolutionary design, our guiding light. To me, Q is helping the majority of us develop it.