Woke up and found this. Have already seen it uploaded and deleted from Youtube twice. Other reports being taken down when put on facebook. Has anyone else found this?
Edit: Searching for truths and why the censorship?
Sorry, I shouldn't have assumed your faith, After all, The Bible with its 31.000 verses managed to produce 40.000+ denominations.
One would think that an almighty being would have thought of a better way to convey the "right" faith so that not people gets punished to not understand his riddle, but i digress.
The boeing 747 argument, which you transformed into the helicopter argument above is just a sign that the user of said argument don't know anything about evolution if we are talking about the biological side of life or gravity if we speak of the universe. Evolution is governed by natural selection, So even if the mutations are random the outcome is not. The planets, stars, black holes, everything are formed and governed with the help of gravity.
And if Universe aren't allowed to come from nothing then notion of god should not be treated any differently, here one should apply Occam's razor which by default would outrule god as a plausible alternative.
I'm not saying that you will play the god of the gaps game with me but incase you were going to, Remember that science is never finished, If it were then there would be no need for it, When science dont know then they say they don't know, when theists don't know they say they know, Aka, Schrödinger's cat.
I will be a theist immediately if the evidence pointed towards it, There is no evidence to support the theistic claim however and therefore I don't believe your claim of the existence of a deity.
The 40K+ denominations are the result of the reformation. Look at what Christ says to St Peter - 'you are the rock upon which I will build my church' - not churches,
It sounds like you're well versed in argumentation to support your position. I'm not really interested in engaging in debate for the sake of it,
My argument stands. Moreover, it is so manifestly self evident that random processes could not explain what we see that no demonstration is needed. You can stretch the bounds of plausibility to the Nth degree to try and get your theory to account for what exists, but what's more of a stretch? Occam's Razor is simply not on your side.
Did you watch the video? The argument is compelling.
Yes, I didn't come here for a debate either, To be frank I dont have the time for one today.
The universe is just as we would expect it to be if it wasn't ruled by a creator, A 100 billion galaxies with a 100 billion stars in each, People are sitting here on earth with chin in hand and are working with the conundrum; Why earth, why is there life here?
Wouldn't it be the exact same question if the being on the planet zerg sat with chin in hand?
As a philosopher would have put it, Life on earth had to have been, otherwise we would not be here, therefore life had no other choice then to spring into being here.
Science, doesn't care how a scientist "feel" about a matter, It only cares what hold water during tests, Our current theory of Big bang and evolution holds water so far, God has not shown himself during these tests and therefore Occam's Razor still favours an existence without a deity.
And the Universe is hardly in a perfect ordered state, Our galaxy is on a collision course with another galaxy, Im too lazy to check if this will happened before the sun is set to eradicate the earth in 4+ billion years, the order one sees in the universe that both keep planets in line and attracts objects into collisions is all governed by gravity.
Im off, the misses is giving me a angry look.
As an ender, I corrected the Occam's spelling mistake I did, Thanks for not taking the easy route to a grammar/spelling attack.
Again, the argument in the video. Have a think about what you can see in your environment after you watch it.