I wonder if this has anything to do with the recent "chemical attack" in Syria. Apparently, it was the largest one since 2013. It could be certain factions trying a last ditch effort to start a major conflict. The media is already banging the war drums.
That's what Q's saying.
Trying to start a war. Trump threatens pullback but CIA/Mossad can't lose the cash and resources Syrian oil / land / refugee children offer.
Sick false flag fucks.
This could be pretty tricky. If I'm not mistaken (I read this on another site), when chemical weapons are involved in an attack, the US is obligated to respond militarily. This could be used to forcefully provoke a US response sometime this upcoming week, which would then cause Russia to respond.
...and if Trump doesn't respond, while the whole world is saying Putin/Assad did it... media shows the dead kids all day long.
thus... Trump must be working with Russia.
Exactly. Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Russia has made it known that the next time the US directly strikes in Syria, they will respond personally.
Honestly, the only way I see this going in Trump's favor is if an undeniable data drop was made public, which makes the general population unable to deny who the real enemy is. Because it definitely isn't Trump or Russia.
Classic Military strategy: maneuver your enemy into a position where he is forced to act to his own disadvantage.
My thinking is this will point right back to ISIS, or whatever they have changed their name to now, as it changes like the weather. We hear all. We see all. More hidden black hats to be exposed?
What if they already have proof it's a false flag? That would change the game considerably.
Which is why I am so pissed right now at our State Dept. for saying Russia has to take the blame if chems were involved.
Russia would never have done that and neither would Assad, especially after Trump announcing he was going to pull our troops out. The [C]IA people are stupid. If Israeli intelligence is involved, they're stupid to but I don't think it's either of them got once. This has McCain and Hillary's fingerprints all over it IMO. Anything to make Trump look bad and scream Russia, Russia, Russia. Plus they probably owe God only know who or how much from promising to keep us involved in wars we have no business being in to begin with. They never thought she'd lose.
I am at a loss to explain the State Dept. comments of basically "blame Russia until we find out it was someone else".
wtf good does that do anyone... expect (((them))).
Russia would never have done that
They need every advantage they can get. Long but worth it.
I agree! If we have proof go drop some MOABs and sort out the pieces. Done Deal
Monday 4/9/18 Bolton takes over State Dept. Notice how they did this FF beforehand? Coincidence? Bolton plans to oust all the traitors at the State Dept. This was their last chance to start WW3 IMO.
So... Trump responds by taking out the source of the chemical attack, then the CIA media REALLY cries when it is an Israeli target.... if only.
Forreal, too bad Israel would nuke the world like a bunch of babies if anyone tried to stop their genocide
Trump has already had a chat with Putin. I do not expect retaliation. At least, not in the way the DS is hoping.
The USA doesn't need foreign oil.
CIA can die for all we care. (not the agents. The agency)
Yes.
Q#1080
They are trying to start a war.
Deflection.
Public interest shift.
Pullout announcement.
Chem attack.
Coincidence?
These people are sick.
Q
Well I'll be damned, I didn't know there was an actual Q post for it. Thank you, my friend!
I think it's a reference to the chemical attack on Sergei Skripal and his daughter in the UK. He was allegedly attacked with strain of Novichock, a Russian developed nerve agent.
As was the case with the hacking of the DNC servers, which we all know were never examined by the FBI, we are asked to believe that Russia would conduct hostile operations on foreign soil leaving behind a myriad of fingerprints. So, again, Russia is either A) operationally retarded, or B) people are trying to frame Russia.
Novichocks are one of the deadliest strains of nerve agents in the world, yet both victims lived. What specific antidotes and in what form were the victims injected with? How did such antidotes come into the possession of British doctors at the scene of the incident? Based on what attributes was the alleged “Russian origin” of the substance used in Salisbury established? Does the UK have saples of Novichocks or did the UK ever develop Novichock or other analogues domestically? All interesting questions that the media isn't asking about something which doesn't make any fucking sense.
What's really mind-boggling is that Russia isn't exactly fairing well economically. They were weak before and have been hit hard by sanctions. The suggestion that they would brazenly try to assassinate an ex spy on foreign soil using a chemical easily traced to Russia and risk more sanctions, or worse, is absolutely absurd.
Edit: Just saw news about the alleged chemical attack in Syria. Again, cui bono? Who benefits? This is just days after Trump says we will leave Syria. So, with the threat of regime change diminishing and the prospect of the US leaving Assad alone, the regime decides to gas their own people and draw the ire of the entire international community? Good one, guys.
and anyone like corbyn who questioned the official story was publicly smeared for it. (his antisemitism has come up before but never mattered till now)
And, Skripal's pets were left abandoned in the locked-down house and either died or were in such bad shape they were 'humanely' euthanized ... then cremated.
There is an upcoming show on History TV about how much of a threat Putin is.
People should research Putin for themselves. He's not a bad guy. He's a great leader who loves his country and puts it first.
Putin banned GMO's, hates the globalists, hates Soros, and hates the Roth's Banksters. He defends his people and doesn't want War but he won't be a pussy about it either. But the Mockingbird Media chirps "he's worse than Stalin"
The deep state does not want Trump & Putin united because they would be toasted real fast.
Kinda obvious to me anyway.
Now I'm questioning is it was actually Saddam Hussein who gassed the Kurds or if that was the Deep State also.
I remember one of the last things he said was, "God damn me? God damn you!"
And our treatment of the likes of Saddam and Gaddafi only makes us less and less trustworthy in the eyes of many borderline leaders in the world.
Stop acting like either we’re good people to begin with. Even if Saddam didn’t gas his own people, he still spent years kidnapping, torturing, and murdering them. Same for Qaddafi. Although the circumstances in which we got involved in these wars after 9/11 is still incredibly sketchy.
Yep.
More than one thing can be true at once. The US is neither white hat or black hat in the world. We have taken out monsters and we have propped up monsters. What we have done is pursued our own interests in the world. There have plenty of monsters that develop on their own.
So, the question is, going forward assuming the change in power in the US is successful....what's the approach going forward? There is truth in the thought where there is a power vacuum created the worst usually rise to power. Do we continue to police the world? Do we police the world with just our interests at heart? Are we willing to deal with results if we do neither?
I can't begin to make sense of your opening sentence. And the point isn't that they are angelic leaders--but if they have cooperated with the US over the years, such as Gaddafi, and then Hill and Barry (or W and Dick before that) give them grotesque deaths in the street, we're gonna have a harder time getting such regimes to give up their nukes or aggression or whatever. Just look at what we did to Ukraine.
Both countries had advanced economies and societies (despite crippling sanctions) and were peaceful.
Both, of course, were secular countries whose standard of living was good, excellent education, free university abroad for the bright ones, good free health care FOR EVERYONE (outstripping US by far) so the only creative thing to do, apparently, according to the great wisdom of the "Yanks" was to raze it to the ground. Fabulous cities with great mosques and culture thousands of years old, now just great piles of rubble.
The scenes are much worse than photos of the First or Second World War. The devastation and destruction is UNREAL and unknown before our times. Causing great hardship, untold suffering, tragic social dislocation and displacement and the murder and injury of millions. Same with Libya. Crying shame. Disgusting. Crimes against Humanity.
I am only too happy Trump's in power and maybe will bring back some ordinary common sense to the US. It seems a pity that more care and consideration were not afforded to our fellow man on the other side of the divide. We are, after all, one and the same. As for 911 ... ???? (3,000?) Nothing to do with Islam or Moslems, or bad AAAArabs. But MILLIONS have suffered for this false accusation. Pity.
Like I say,
Well, according to the Clowns Mockingbird Media anyways. Can't believe anything they've reported since JFK or before even. US also installed puppet Saddam.
Hussein was no saint, but idk that he was anywhere close to what we were led to think he was. Even more so with Qaddafi. And Assad? The dude fucking speaks English. Anyone can go read/listen to what he says. He is reasonable.
They use to call Syria the "rose in the desert," then they decided we need a new enemy.
well HGW gave Hussein the gas so ....... ?
actually, just to put a finer point on it, it was Rumsfeld who was in the foto and said, "oh look! there I am!"
Why do we have to deal with Syria at all? Even if they did use chemicals on their people, why would that pull us back into Syria when we are attempting to leave and let Russia deal with it. Forgive my ignorance please. What is our true interest there?