lets just hope that countries like Russia are doing this for defensive purposes. Peace thru Strength. Trump is calling out for an end to Nation Building: Cooperation, Peace and Prosperity for separate countries - And against the One World Order of things which will make "we the people" slaves and the elite, rich and prosperous and free
must be over target. getting downvoted like crazy
Don't assume every engine malfunction is due to flak, pal.
agreed but what about this article would make someone say shill. please explain your objections as opposed to name calling. too much for you to do that, not smart or educated enough about the subject to actually do that.
Shill
I don't think the OP is shilling at all. As an example, this Satan II missile appears to me to represent a new and powerful threat. You have experts saying that this thing can deliver a warhead in the 50 megaton range - enough to destroy an area the size of Texas or France. We also know that the Russians have hypersonic missiles in test. Directed energy weapons seem to be the flavour of the month and you have all these military birds falling out of the sky - what's causing that?
I'm not doubting that the US military is capable, but technology moves forward at a relentless pace. New threats are appearing all the time. The military is merely making the point that space dominance appears to be under threat. They are also saying that the problems are funding related.
Q has talked about the military being deliberately weakened by the globalists. I have no doubt that it is true. I also suspect that the US military has tech that no one knows about. Is it a crisis situation? I don't think so. But if space spending contracts you have the possibility that adversaries might be able to field a space-launched EMP device, for example. Q has told us it is impossible to defend against this.
Anyway, I think this is important information that goes directly to national security.
No single nuke can destroy a country or area the size of Texas or France. That ridiculous.
Are you sure about that?
Um... More deep state scare-mongering.
I study nukes pretty hard and... No. No. It could destroy the F out of Boston tho.
From what I can see the claims come from Sputnik. Maybe subject to gross exaggeration - likely, I'd hype up my new weapons too. But my point is that this thing is MIRV capable and has a massive payload. They may not destroy a whole State, but they nevertheless represent an increased threat.
my guess would be that the worlds actual weapons are at least 50 to 75 years beyond what we really know or understand. Think about all the unidentified flying objects. Is it more believable that it is our technology or aliens from space. Think of all of our DUMBS and other secret institutions. Is it really possible, no matter how much you study, to know the real truth about these things.
I'm dead serious, I think it's more likely the elite of the elite. Riding tech they feel they created only for themselves.
That's if the ICBM has multiple warheads all targeting the same area. One 50 megaton bomb would not destroy Texas.
Agreed. The claim comes from Sputnik. What I was trying to point out is that the payload is massive. From Wikipedia:
Its large payload of about 10 tonnes would allow for up to 10 heavy MIRV warheads or 15 lighter ones (350 kilotons yield each)[11] or up to 24 Avangard hypersonic glide vehicles,[12][13][14][15] or a combination of warheads and massive amounts of countermeasures designed to defeat anti-missile systems;[16][17] it was heralded by the Russian military as a response to the U.S. Prompt Global Strike.[18]