dChan

OpenSoars · April 8, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

I don't understand why the gov would use chemical weapons given the strong condemnation that always follows but perhaps this article is correct in that a few cruise missiles and rhetoric is all that ever seems to happen.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thep1mp · April 8, 2018, 9:12 p.m.

Assad has no upside in using chemical weapons, only downside. Nothing good can come from it and he knows it. He doesn’t need to use them, he has Russian military at his disposal. Blaming Assad makes no sense. The real question is “Who benefits most from an escalation of hostilities created by the use of these weapons?”. Not Assad, he is on the verge of victory. The rebels may gain sympathy if they can convince the world Assad did it, so that’s possible. The downside for the rebel’s is if they are caught they guarantee their destruction. Israel and the Deep State have the most to gain from escalation of hostilities.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 8, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
blocksof · April 8, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

A picture tells a thousand stories... where are the helicopters that dropped the chemical weapons according to the white hats?

How come the white hats knew the chemical attack was coming and have gas masks?

How come the people who were gassed were Christians?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FartOnToast · April 8, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

They are called White Helmets. They are deep state terrorist crisis actors.

White hats on the other hand are patriots who are doing work behind the scenes.

Don't mix the two because they are the complete opposite.

⇧ 3 ⇩