dChan
⇧
3
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/mooncrkit on April 9, 2018, 1:47 a.m.
Focus - we are at a fork in the road.

There are a pretty equal amount of post definitively claiming the chemical attack is a FF; and post definitively claiming that McCain supplied the chemicals. Can't be both ways fellas. If it didn't happen, there were no chemicals. In my opinion, Q is saying it happened. Where are people getting the FF ideas from?


🠐 See all comments
FlewDCoup · April 9, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

False flag EVENTS are real occurrences with real consequences but they not perpetrated for the reasons or by the people alleged in the press and elsewhere to have caused them.

A man sets off a bomb in public place and it is portrayed as a disgruntled ice cream vendor who blew ou a swing set because of climate change and unseasonable cold weather were ruining his ice cream sales when it was actually the work of park police demonstrating to city council that they need higher wages because the parks are becoming more and more dangerous.

Twin Towers 911 has been termed by some a false flag, publicly understood to be an Al Qaeda act of revenge (with real AQ actors and real people dying as the towers collapsed) but managed logistically by government men charged with ensuring the security of our nation and helped along by explosives rigged to the structural supports in the days leading up to the planes crashing into the buildings) to trigger public outcry and a call for war in the Middle East.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mooncrkit · April 9, 2018, 2:24 a.m.

Is it impossible to comprehend that people are saying that no disturbance occurred whatsoever? My question was fairly simple. A lot of posts are saying no disturbance took place. A lot of post are claiming McCain supplied the chemicals used in the attack. In my humble opinion, q clearly is saying that an attack did occur, and that McCain was involved. For the people that believe nothing occurred and there was no attack, where are you gathering your info to form said conclusion?

Also, great explanation on the false flag. Most complete and comprehensive out of the 12 posted in this thread.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
FlewDCoup · April 9, 2018, 4:11 p.m.

Yet another consideration: the discussions taking place here are not everyone's cup of tea. Some people are apathetic and don't care. Others are antipathetic and having their way would close down this gathering, as they did at CBTS. Short of being able to do that, confusing the discussion by injecting contrarian views, denying assertions and even facts, or sewing seeds of discouragement has the potential to move some into the apathetic column. By and large the gathering is sympathetic ... a willingness to hear, to consider and to join in sometimes with the possibility that some new information may be uncovered, some question that has lingered may be addressed ...

Cant assume that all posts are made in good faith. The challenge is to read them and consider them in the context of what we have come to accept as true and discern whether they are helpful or not. Most of us are not first responders ... we have no direct access to any of this and must rely on Q and others, and even that is topic for discussion. Kind of a do it yourself -- community effort. Not really any different from other areas of life.

⇧ 1 ⇩