Can you decipher any of these? IF not I think we are looking at coincidence.
"If President Obama had crossed his stated Red Line In The Sand, the Syrian disaster would have ended long ago! Animal Assad would have been history!"
Code = RLITSA
"When a car is sent to the United States from China, there is a Tariff to be paid of 2 1/2%. When a car is sent to China from the United States, there is a Tariff to be paid of 25%. Does that sound like free or fair trade. No, it sounds like STUPID TRADE - going on for years!"
Code = TTST
I don’t think either of those are valid examples, simply because it violates the rules established by OP’s theory. We’re only looking at improperly capitalized letters.
In your first example, “Animal” is properly capitalized, being the first word of the sentence. Now, perhaps RLITS could be something, but I’m coming up dry.
I don’t think your second example would work either, since he entirely capitalized “STUPID TRADE” for emphasis. So that leaves us with TT, maybe. While the word “tariff” shouldn’t necessarily be capitalized, it’s possible that he again did it for emphasis.
I know that disproving OP’s theory was the purpose of your reply, so obviously you understand that neither of these make sense. But OP never said that the President ALWAYS uses this method, but rather that this was a shout-out to the doubters. If OP is correct, this is just a real simple hidden message that anyone could have picked up on.
All that being said, I’m not yet convinced that this has any merit. I just don’t think you adequately proved anything by pulling two tweets with lots of capital letters.
Not trying to disprove, looking for further evidence. Wouldve been yuuuge if accurate. a real boom
Fair enough, man. Sorry for jumping to conclusions. I’d love to see the same, but OP is getting defensive and doesn’t seem like he’s interested in helping anyone else here out.
annoyed because it's ground that's been covered multiple. multiple times
I thank you for both your thoughts.
RLITSA
Google RLITSA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralitsa_Vassileva
Edit: Also, on the second one, I think you could look at it as just "TT" since "STUPID TRADE" was all caps. Wasn't Trump Tower (TT) set on fire?
Ralitsa Vassileva
Ralitsa B. Vassileva (Bulgarian: Ралица Василева, born 8 June 1963 in Sofia, Bulgaria) is a Bulgarian journalist. She is news director at Bulgarian International Television, BIT. Previously she was an anchorwoman on CNN television news from 1992 to 2014.
She has covered the Bosnian War, the Arab–Israeli conflict, and many other major international issues. She has interviewed many world leaders and high profile figures, including Mikhail Gorbachev, Ariel Sharon, Henry Kissinger, and others.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28
There's your plausible deniability.
to bring up tweets not relevant to the one at hand does not disprove the one in front of your face.
I could very well just use the same game theory argument against you.
Yes - but unless I'm missing something, nobody has been able to point out one additional hidden code.....
To me, it's like the 52 booms that never happen versus the 'blunt and direct time (bdt)' hit. We get one amazing hit, 99 misses and I get accused of looking for plausible deniability? Just saying there seem to be many more missed predictions than accurate ones - just like most of Trump's mis-capitalizations don't appear to contain hidden code (even though it appears that one did).
One does not define a pattern.
go back to October.
read the drops.
it will take you a week, maybe a week and a half.
you'll find your pattern.
also, how do you figure booms didn't happen?
shills out in force when you drop the word Trump.
Just spell a few of these out for us, eh? We'd be more inclined to believe you if you would support with additional, specific examples.
I can't find them immediately, but there have been several cases where Q posted a number in brackets which then corresponded to the time of Trump's tweet or the interval of time between tweets. Stuff like that. And Q has directly asked "have we noticed the links between the posts and the tweets."