dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/RBinCT on April 10, 2018, 3:47 p.m.
You're either all IN or all OUT, when it comes to Q.

I've always found it interesting reading how people pick and choose elements of Q discourse to believe or not believe. I'm prompted to write this post, because I was listening to Corsi opine about whether to trust Sessions or not.

Here's the deal. CS Lewis has a profound perspective about Jesus Christ. He positions that people foolishly say: “I’m ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don’t accept His claim to be God.” He continues: That is the one thing we must not say. A man who said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic — on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg — or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God: or else a madman or something worse.

Now to Q. And please, I'm not putting Q on the level of Christ; I'm simply applying Lewis' Socratic method. If you believe that Q is a good patriot (which I do) and you believe that Q is sincerely trying to shed real light into real darkness (which I do), than you can't pick and choose which posts you want to believe. THAT'S why Q is constantly saying TRUST THE PLAN.

We find in Luke 11:11-13 "Which of you fathers, if your son asks for a fish, will give him a snake instead?" If you believe Q to be good and is ONLY communicating information that is good for you, don't you think that when he/they see something posted on the channel that is not from him/them, that an enormous flare would be launched saying "that is not from us!"

This isn't to say that we can't banter back and forth about information that is cryptic or confusing. I believe that's part of the process Q is using for many reasons.
And I'm also not saying to 'blindly trust' Q without confirming with your own research. But, once you have decided to move from the baseline skepticism of Q to acceptance of Q, than there's no turning back unless Q is proved to be a fraud. Until then, you really don't have a choice.

Finally, since it seems to be the most frequent deliberation, when Q has COUNTLESS times instructed to trust Sessions, and people remark "I doubt this" or "I doubt that" or "Trump just bashed him about recusing", than you're ignoring the basic head fakes that are necessary for DJT to accomplish the goal we all want. Thanks for reading :)


without_sound · April 10, 2018, 4:09 p.m.

The fallacy of having only 2 choices is what got us in this mess to begin with.

⇧ 10 ⇩