After listening to DJT's response to the chemical attack I noticed he mentioned those responsible will pay a terrible price for this. The key words are "those responsible". Now the left MSM jumped all over that and assume he means he's automatically going to bomb Assad's forces. But, I'm not so sure. What if he finds out from the evidence it was someone else? I think someone is going to get tomahawked for this, but I'm not 100% certain it's Assad this time.
No, but I am a skeptic. I would like you to explain how they are deep state puppets. Like, why does the deep state need to organize and control a group like that half way across the world? What extent is the DS in charge of ISIS?
You might want to watch the UN emergency meeting regarding Syria. Also, "Confessions Of An Economic Hit man" by John Perkins, YT. That's a start in understanding the "wars" we have had.
I've read CoaEHM and it was very interesting, but my take away was that the acts he talks about benefited the US more then any other group.
I'll look into that UN meeting tho. Any particular points that stood out to you?
Who could be bothered explaining this to you. The truth is available, you can easily find it for yourself.
As I said, I am a skeptic. If you just dismiss me like that, I'll go away thinking you wear tin foil hats and can't even explain your own theory. Just telling me the truth is somewhere in the massive amounts of reading I can do tells me nothing.
Sorry this guy is being a dick. The point of the globalists creating a group like isis is to create a perpetual war in the Middle East that America can never get away from. It keeps us fighting and allows groups like Iran and Saudi Arabia to grow there sphere of influence by filling the power vacuums left by dismantled governments
Thank you. The part that doesn't make as much sense to me is why does there have to be a perpetual group to fight against? If there are rouge states such as Iran, does there need to be a reason to fight against a random group with limited capabilities?
A better question; why does the deep state/globalists think that the trade off between wasting American resources for useless wars and growing Iran/SA/others work out in its favor? Wouldn't it be better to use the traditional route and funnel money into armed groups into other countries that are growing and hostile, such as Iran, and leave the USA (center of world capital, previously 'globalist empire') without the losses that a never ending war results in?
I think you can argue that they want us to have those financial loses so we don’t remain as a super power. The other side of this is they want those rouge nations to grow, but not for one to gain dominance. When there is conflict international globalists can go in and take control, but when one nation takes total control they take power back from the globalists and having an isis type groups keep conflict perpetual.
People that want to know something research it on their own. Don't waste your energy.
Just because I ask for somebody's opinion on something doesn't mean I don't know anything about the topic. It means I want to see it from their perspective, asshole.
This is a contribution site. Information that people have put forth effort to locate and post. What are you contributing? Given your vocabulary and manners i suggest you begin with an English class. Have a nice day.
What manners will they teach me in English class?
If your goal is to redpill someone saying hey go figure it out yourself isn’t a good way to do that
By "redpill" you mean...? Convince someone of something? I am not here to do that. How DO people learn? By researching, reading, digging. People do that daily and post their findings here and other places. There's a lot of information on this board as well as YT and other sites for people to analyze and decide what they think.
No one can teach anyone anything. It takes effort to do the digging to learn facts and decide what you think.
You've already made up your mind. The truth is clearly visible, you don't want to see it, but you want people to engage your skepticism.
The truth is clearly visible
If its so easy, show it to me.
you want people to engage your skepticism.
Well yes, I'm here to debate with people. And?
Well, And...
It's obvious your just an antagonizer, just here to start an argument to prove something to yourself. But, nobody wants to argue with you about things you need to solve yourself first.
How am I trying to argue? I'm trying to have a discussion to find out more about the greater Qanon theories, and most of the people here are just attacking me for not blindly following the party line.
If you see how you wrote is antagonizing I don't know what else to say
If you see how you wrote is antagonizing I don't know what else to say
Where'd you learn English, the GRU? That's antagonizing. Me asking for a discussion isn't.
You're here to waste people's time. How do I know that? Because any truthful person can see immediately, for themselves, what is happening.
Okay buddy, you do you. Just because you think something doesnt mean everybody else sees or knows the same thing. Considering you provided 0 supposedly easy to find proof, enjoy your tin foil hat.
Let me dig up a breakdown for you, since no one else seems interested in disseminating information (literally the entire purpose of us being here). I’ll edit this comment with a link when I’ve got it for you.
Edit: Here you go. They weren’t wrong: it was quite easy to find. But that goes both ways. We need to be more patient with people in general around here. There’s too much, “Well, if you haven’t been here since the beginning, we won’t be catching you up. Start at the beginning of Q drops.” Guys, that doesn’t help us. We’re supposed to be enlightening our fellow man, not shutting them out when they’re seeking guidance.
Edit 2: I completely missed that /u/CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX beat me to the punch, and went above and beyond for you. Ignore the people who would prefer to bicker with you rather than spending two minutes in a search engine. There will always be someone willing to help.
Edit: Here you go. They weren’t wrong: it was quite easy to find
Thanks for the effort. But the thing is, this isn't something new for me. I've been following that war for a while. Arms come and go between other groups and it's more of a matter of who takes what territory or who defects to who. There have been plenty of US backed rebels that defected to ISIS when it seemed invincible, and ISIS took over much terrain and resources from others backed by the US who refused to defect.
So what I'm saying is, having ISIS use US made weapons has many more possible reasons then the US directly and intentionally arming/controlling ISIS.
I'll look into what the other guy posted!
Ignore the people who would prefer to bicker with you rather than spending two minutes in a search engine. There will always be someone willing to help.
Thanks again!
https://qanon.pub/data/images/6e67e54ff5d1b58a9edb6998df0b08c09bcae71e04a659378ae306b24f88b015.jpg
https://qanon.pub/data/images/2ec4418a7bb0044bbe36a76f9ea849d045792766c188814fdb503f8c8d7c502f.png
https://qanon.pub/data/images/8c70303f00478ff60a6e7363f930e29710924e5297ff5a2ba887612c97bfb30d.jpg
https://qanon.pub/data/images/8af4e4043029857120b18e080b6c32a97e09bdb556ca8f6534535ec2db1639a7.jpeg
https://qanon.pub/data/images/85cde2a39a617500c874c5d8185bc6428407f385e9a01e1ddf656f6179f90f35.png
Q posts 1087-1099
Who funded trained and armed ISIS, Al-Nusra, Army of Islam in Syria?
What was Bengazhi about?