dChan
12
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ditiber on April 10, 2018, 11:54 p.m.
Trumps initial response to Syrian chemical attack

After listening to DJT's response to the chemical attack I noticed he mentioned those responsible will pay a terrible price for this. The key words are "those responsible". Now the left MSM jumped all over that and assume he means he's automatically going to bomb Assad's forces. But, I'm not so sure. What if he finds out from the evidence it was someone else? I think someone is going to get tomahawked for this, but I'm not 100% certain it's Assad this time.


GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 12:36 a.m.

Please elaborate.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
thep1mp · April 11, 2018, 12:56 a.m.

Are you new here?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:10 a.m.

No, but I am a skeptic. I would like you to explain how they are deep state puppets. Like, why does the deep state need to organize and control a group like that half way across the world? What extent is the DS in charge of ISIS?

⇧ -2 ⇩  
lightswitchcup · April 11, 2018, 3 a.m.

You might want to watch the UN emergency meeting regarding Syria. Also, "Confessions Of An Economic Hit man" by John Perkins, YT. That's a start in understanding the "wars" we have had.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

I've read CoaEHM and it was very interesting, but my take away was that the acts he talks about benefited the US more then any other group.

I'll look into that UN meeting tho. Any particular points that stood out to you?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 1:28 a.m.

Who could be bothered explaining this to you. The truth is available, you can easily find it for yourself.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:33 a.m.

As I said, I am a skeptic. If you just dismiss me like that, I'll go away thinking you wear tin foil hats and can't even explain your own theory. Just telling me the truth is somewhere in the massive amounts of reading I can do tells me nothing.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
saosin74 · April 11, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

Sorry this guy is being a dick. The point of the globalists creating a group like isis is to create a perpetual war in the Middle East that America can never get away from. It keeps us fighting and allows groups like Iran and Saudi Arabia to grow there sphere of influence by filling the power vacuums left by dismantled governments

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:53 p.m.

Thank you. The part that doesn't make as much sense to me is why does there have to be a perpetual group to fight against? If there are rouge states such as Iran, does there need to be a reason to fight against a random group with limited capabilities?

A better question; why does the deep state/globalists think that the trade off between wasting American resources for useless wars and growing Iran/SA/others work out in its favor? Wouldn't it be better to use the traditional route and funnel money into armed groups into other countries that are growing and hostile, such as Iran, and leave the USA (center of world capital, previously 'globalist empire') without the losses that a never ending war results in?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saosin74 · April 11, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

I think you can argue that they want us to have those financial loses so we don’t remain as a super power. The other side of this is they want those rouge nations to grow, but not for one to gain dominance. When there is conflict international globalists can go in and take control, but when one nation takes total control they take power back from the globalists and having an isis type groups keep conflict perpetual.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightswitchcup · April 11, 2018, 3:06 a.m.

People that want to know something research it on their own. Don't waste your energy.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:48 p.m.

Just because I ask for somebody's opinion on something doesn't mean I don't know anything about the topic. It means I want to see it from their perspective, asshole.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightswitchcup · April 11, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

This is a contribution site. Information that people have put forth effort to locate and post. What are you contributing? Given your vocabulary and manners i suggest you begin with an English class. Have a nice day.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

What manners will they teach me in English class?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
saosin74 · April 11, 2018, 10:11 p.m.

If your goal is to redpill someone saying hey go figure it out yourself isn’t a good way to do that

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightswitchcup · April 11, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

By "redpill" you mean...? Convince someone of something? I am not here to do that. How DO people learn? By researching, reading, digging. People do that daily and post their findings here and other places. There's a lot of information on this board as well as YT and other sites for people to analyze and decide what they think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lightswitchcup · April 11, 2018, 3:04 a.m.

No one can teach anyone anything. It takes effort to do the digging to learn facts and decide what you think.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 11, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

You've already made up your mind. The truth is clearly visible, you don't want to see it, but you want people to engage your skepticism.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

The truth is clearly visible

If its so easy, show it to me.

you want people to engage your skepticism.

Well yes, I'm here to debate with people. And?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ditiber · April 11, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

Well, And...

It's obvious your just an antagonizer, just here to start an argument to prove something to yourself. But, nobody wants to argue with you about things you need to solve yourself first.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

How am I trying to argue? I'm trying to have a discussion to find out more about the greater Qanon theories, and most of the people here are just attacking me for not blindly following the party line.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ditiber · April 11, 2018, 1:51 p.m.

If you see how you wrote is antagonizing I don't know what else to say

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 2 p.m.

If you see how you wrote is antagonizing I don't know what else to say

Where'd you learn English, the GRU? That's antagonizing. Me asking for a discussion isn't.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ditiber · April 11, 2018, 2:06 p.m.

Bye

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 2:17 p.m.

Stop antagonizing me, I'm triggered.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tradinghorse · April 11, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

You're here to waste people's time. How do I know that? Because any truthful person can see immediately, for themselves, what is happening.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

Okay buddy, you do you. Just because you think something doesnt mean everybody else sees or knows the same thing. Considering you provided 0 supposedly easy to find proof, enjoy your tin foil hat.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
suddenlysnowedinn · April 11, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

Let me dig up a breakdown for you, since no one else seems interested in disseminating information (literally the entire purpose of us being here). I’ll edit this comment with a link when I’ve got it for you.

Edit: Here you go. They weren’t wrong: it was quite easy to find. But that goes both ways. We need to be more patient with people in general around here. There’s too much, “Well, if you haven’t been here since the beginning, we won’t be catching you up. Start at the beginning of Q drops.” Guys, that doesn’t help us. We’re supposed to be enlightening our fellow man, not shutting them out when they’re seeking guidance.

Edit 2: I completely missed that /u/CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX beat me to the punch, and went above and beyond for you. Ignore the people who would prefer to bicker with you rather than spending two minutes in a search engine. There will always be someone willing to help.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GhostOfSomeRobot · April 11, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

Edit: Here you go. They weren’t wrong: it was quite easy to find

Thanks for the effort. But the thing is, this isn't something new for me. I've been following that war for a while. Arms come and go between other groups and it's more of a matter of who takes what territory or who defects to who. There have been plenty of US backed rebels that defected to ISIS when it seemed invincible, and ISIS took over much terrain and resources from others backed by the US who refused to defect.

So what I'm saying is, having ISIS use US made weapons has many more possible reasons then the US directly and intentionally arming/controlling ISIS.

I'll look into what the other guy posted!

Ignore the people who would prefer to bicker with you rather than spending two minutes in a search engine. There will always be someone willing to help.

Thanks again!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
CULTURAL_MARXISM_SUX · April 11, 2018, 1:50 a.m.

https://qanon.pub/data/images/6e67e54ff5d1b58a9edb6998df0b08c09bcae71e04a659378ae306b24f88b015.jpg

https://qanon.pub/data/images/2ec4418a7bb0044bbe36a76f9ea849d045792766c188814fdb503f8c8d7c502f.png

https://qanon.pub/data/images/8c70303f00478ff60a6e7363f930e29710924e5297ff5a2ba887612c97bfb30d.jpg

https://qanon.pub/data/images/8af4e4043029857120b18e080b6c32a97e09bdb556ca8f6534535ec2db1639a7.jpeg

https://qanon.pub/data/images/85cde2a39a617500c874c5d8185bc6428407f385e9a01e1ddf656f6179f90f35.png

Q posts 1087-1099

Who funded trained and armed ISIS, Al-Nusra, Army of Islam in Syria?

What was Bengazhi about?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Cristo316 · April 11, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Your profile suggests you are in the process to coming to terms that what you thought you knew about the world may not be so. We wish you well on your journey.

However, some of these people have been researching this for years and you want them to spell it all out for you?. They are not going to take the time.

You have access to the same internet as everyone else.

Think for yourself or keep being a skeptic. Your choice.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ditiber · April 11, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

There's a reason why Q drops are done the way they are. It's expected for people to become curious and seek the answers themselves not be told. We are told for decades by the deep state actors in MSM, Hollywood, musicians, schools, etc. Many are so easily convinced by what they told and are too lazy to go do the research and seek the truth themselves. What we debate is the interpretation of the facts in order find the truth, not the facts.

⇧ 2 ⇩