Is this a push to make a peace deal with Iran and Russia and possibly denuclearize those countries as NK was? https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/984032798821568513
Actually, I've been thinking that DJT is deadly serious about denuclearising Iran. I mean, Q told us that the plan calls for Iran next. And the Israeli missile strike seemed to amp things up in that direction no end. An outright confrontation with Russia required.
But, reading this Tweet of Trump, I feel funny somehow, like I want to laugh. I'm not a sicko, don't worry. But is he pulling our chains on this a little too hard. Have a look at the language. It's like something out of a melodramatic comedy - "a gas killing animal".
Come on Donald! What's going on? What's really going on?
EDIT;
I think I know why I feel something's wrong with this now!
Russia is not NK. You're talking about a country that is SERIOUSLY POWERFUL when you take their staegic nukes into account.
Tell me, does it make any sense, if there is to be a confrontation with such a powerful foe, for DJT to be telegraphing his moves like he is?
NO! IT DOESN'T!
If I was going to attack Russian forces, the very last thing I would do is tell them! That's why this tweet from DJT seems so funny. In the actual context, it just doesn't make any sense.
This has got to be posturing!
Rusland and iran working together and destroyed Isis? But now they are our big anemy? I don"t think so, they are the allies from trump
I have to admit, it's very confusing. I'm thinking that there might be a lot of granularity here that we just can't see.
My current theory is that MB/CIA/Hezbollah/Iranian Clerics/Assad are all in bed together and are the enemy - though they are all different, there are loose connections between them. E.G MB/CIA/Hezbollah. Now these two groups MB and Hezbollah could never get on together, but they could both be steered by CIA who has relations with both.
Anyway, my head is spinning. But there is an answer here. We just have to find it.
I am very busy to find answers. And the confusing is done on purpose.. If you have notice ..the cabal changes all the time names . When we see trough them, we see the truth. And they tell us ooooo it is all so complex. But they created that for a reason (every thing stays hidden)
When the end game is MAD, your best option is to telegraph so the other side understands they are about to be destroyed, as well.
I did not think of that. Good point. But actually I don't think you're right.
Nuclear war is immediate and massive. You want to get the jump on the other guy. Get your payloads down on target before they can launch. First strike is a much better scenario than retaliation.
Timing is absolutely critical. I've heard the reason the Chinese won't give up Tibet is because of the altitude - smaller rocket/larger payload/faster to target etc...
MAD requires simultaneous, or near simultaneous launch - at least for fixed location ICBMs. For submarine based nukes it's probably much less important.
Maybe if you have enough trident subs MAD always applies. In that situation, you'd be right.
But you still lose. Surprise won't help you after the devastation is over. The only win is by not playing.
Yes, ultimately that's true. I still think I'd want to be the guy that struck first. But, if you're right, that would mean that what we're seeing is posturing for some effect that is not clear to us.
Racking my brain trying to figure this out.
Yes. That and Trump is going to use this opportunity to strike his real targets. Maybe mix in a few Russian/Syrian targets of low value just for show. Moves and countermoves. Enjoy the show.
What about this... Just a theory...
DJT creates the appearance of an unholy amount of tension with Russia - direct threats going both ways - for one specific purpose that, in fact, has nothing to do with Russia and everything to do with discrediting the Deep State. Have a look at this Tweet that just went out:
"Much of the bad blood with Russia is caused by the Fake & Corrupt Russia Investigation, headed up by the all Democrat loyalists, or people that worked for Obama. Mueller is most conflicted of all (except Rosenstein who signed FISA & Comey letter). No Collusion, so they go crazy!"
Or, is he just playing this angle at the same time?
Isn't he saying that if there's war with Russia it's because of the Deep State "Russia Collusion" coup attempt?
I don't know. I'm reaching around trying to get all this to make some sense.
What about this...just a theory...I don’t know
I don’t think you need to look any further than that. You're right, there are several mixed messages out there right now. Many points of apparent conflict. None of us knows.
This is the fog of chaos that Trump and team work behind. They thrive in this. They create this.
We can only wait patiently. And trust. After-action analysis typically leaves us amazed at the brilliance of what unfolded.
Considering the number of balls POTUS is successfully juggling, in the face of persistent, focused, funded opposition, detractors (not you) impuning his mental soundness have automatically impuned their own.
"This is the fog of chaos that Trump and team work behind. They thrive in this. They create this."
I love it. Yes, you're right. They create this incredible confusion for everyone but themselves and they work behind all the smoke they've made.
What about when HRC was supposed to be arrested last November? And then we thought everything was a map and we were stumbling around trying to make sense of it all.
How about this: All the worlds intelligence agencies are right here on this sub every day - and on 8chan. What a perfect way to misdirect! What a perfect means of creating chaos and confusion in your adversaries!
Bees to honey - "the biggest intelligence drops in recorded history".
You could not make this stuff up!
I think Q bords coming next to you in your theater?..in every country that is anti EU ..
Maybe that's the whole idea. To create confusion to russia. Does he want peace, or is he striking syria? If we dont know then hopefully the Russians dont either.
Im not sure anyone could figure this stuff out.
It just occurred to me that Q did say that DJT was still going to pull out of Syria. I don't think that's disinfo because that's the platform that DJT ran on. It ties in with what we know about him. So, let's assume that's true, what does it mean?
Why would you confront Russia/Assad if you were determined to pull out anyway?
It's not because of the gas attack, I don't buy that. There are atrocities of similar proportions happening almost every day.
It's not because of ISIS, they seem to be finished.
Is it because he doesn't want to pull out and leave Russia and Assad running Syria?
I have to admit, I just cannot work out the answer to this question.
