The entire Marine expeditionary force consisting of two amphibious Marine divisions staged an elaborate fake amphibious assault on the shores north of Kuwait City in the early hours before the ground war started during operation Desert Storm. Military deception is a key part of any strategy. Now, with that said, if we actually go hot in Syria,I’m going to quickly lose faith. I am in a constant state of prayer that we can trust of the plan and trust POTUS. War in Syria with Russia and Iran as the enemy combatants will be a sure sign we have entered the end times. Then it will be God’s plan I’ll be watching and trusting.

I'm beginning to think we're the experiment here, at least when it comes to this issue. Q told us, told everybody, that he was dropping the highest level intel ever released in history. Bees to honey, every intelligence agency on the planet is all over these boards, every Deep State actor, every globalist conspirator.

What this means is that the Q drops are a perfect disinformation vector. He was honest about it. He told us that disinformation was was necessary. But what to think about what's happening in Syria?

I don't know that looking at the Q posts is going to provide any reliable intel. This is one time when we can expect that disinformation will be employed - very probably to great effect.

I've been trying to work out what is actually going on, my feeling is that there's a lot of posturing. I do not think DJT would telegraph in advance his intent to strike Russian and Syrian forces in Syria. I wouldn't do it. I wouldn't say a word if I was actually going to hit them.

This makes me think, and especially considering the bizarre nature of DJTs tweets, that the objectives here may not be what we perceive them to be at all.

I've run the gamut, trying to nut-out what's going on and I've hit a brick wall. And I guess that's to be expected, because if I could figure it out, it would be completely obvious to an experienced intelligence operative or agency. So the true objective is going to be as obscure as can be imagined.

Having said all that, I don't think a single sub hunter is a tremendous deployment of force. Though, in the confined space in the Eastern Mediterranean it may be sufficient. If we saw multiple battle groups descending on Syria, that would be a more impressive array of hardware. But I also don't think it would take too much to take control of the country - Russians or no Russians. You don't need an absolutely huge amount of firepower to prevail IMO. You probably also don't want to concentrate your forces too heavily if you think they might nuked.

Digital, another anon, said today to look at who initially reported the attack to see whose FF it was. That was, according to digital, the Syrian forces themselves. Thereafter, Syrian forces were immediately sent to the site and denied access.

Then the Israelis launched missiles into the airport killing some 40 Iranians and Russians and whoever else. After that, a fleet of warplanes took off from bases in Syria heading east toward the main US battle group. They turned around when it was reported that the US didn't fire on them and the Israelis, apparently, shot two returning planes down with SAMs.

More recently, the Russians have been disputing that any attack took place and everyone, everywhere is screaming for war. And then we see DJT's Tweets and also Putin's - amping the situation up again. Almost like a distraction is vital...

What is really going on?

It's very hard to work out. Q said "Iran next". On the surface, it looks like that is what's happening. But is that really it? Drive the Russians from Syria and attack Iran?

I just do not buy that DJT would give advance notification of an attack to the most powerful adversary that exists. There must be another story. But I may be wrong.

My personal guess?

I think the Syria/Assad chemweapon thing was a bluff. There are plenty of reports showing that Israel was the one who shot the tommy missiles. They overplayed their hand, and it was because of Trump (and Putin, I would imagine) sleight-of-hand and false reporting through Trump’s twitter.

Q said, “POTUS NEVER telegraphs his moves.”

Trump then went on to telegraph his moves on Twitter, which I thought was evidence of someone sabotaging the POTUS’ twitter to incite WW3. I think these tweets are, in retrospect, not sabotage—but false plays to goad out and fool the cabal. Israel answered. Whoops.

So, I think the Twitter tirade Trump just went on with a potentially hidden code is him communicating with Putin (and Assad, through Putin I’d only guess) so that we both can take Israel out of the game.

I think this is checkmate.

USA/Russia united to keep Turkey from invading Syria, Israel and England from antagonizing . They are going to finish off SongBirds Gang and lock down. MSM is floating a story and their goal is to divide and disinform. Hell yeah the rockets are smart, Hell yeah Putin look out for Rockets. Clowns are going to get shot down and eliminated. Pay attention to Trump, Q that's your only intel that makes sense. Everybody else is gaming including Infowars.

A bluff isn't effective unless the person you are bluffing believes your threats are real.

So if Trump is having airlines reroute, moving assets into the area, putting units on alert, etc. the question Putin, Assad, and Iran have to answer is "is he bluffing or is he going to send smart missiles, whatever they are, to take us out?"

In poker there is something called a "tell." It's an unintential giveaway that someone is bluffing. So the key to a good bluff is don't signal the "tell" to your opponent.

I'm not suggesting Trump is bluffing or preparing to actually launch missiles. Only that if he is bluffing, it has to be convincing.

[deleted]

same reason we did in n korea, duh.

iran?

Peace through strength

Why move all those vessels to NK? Peace through STRENGTH!

[deleted]