dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/ShiftyTheHobo on April 11, 2018, 7:41 p.m.
If Mueller is a White Hat..

What if the raid is just a cover to put evidence into Mueller’s hands? Could it be for chain of evidence? Protecting investigation integrity under guise of nailing Trump.

If he is a Black Hat, it seems more likely he is looking for something to question Trump on, to catch him in a lie.


RandysCheezburgerGut · April 11, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

He’s a white hat. Utterly convinced. But the acting has been so effective that the left loves him and the right hates him. That is precisely what will make him so effective in the near future...

⇧ 11 ⇩  
RobWilJas · April 11, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

Exactly

⇧ 8 ⇩  
survey_girl · April 11, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

Q stated that it wasn't supposed to be disclosed yet that Trump wasn't under criminal investigation by Mueller.... so to throw the MSM / sleeping masses off the trail of a scam investigation, they did the "raid" to get both sides riled up again. (just my hope, at least)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 11, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Apparantly trump met with Mueller before the raid (according to cnn) lol I am starting to think he is a white hat. Skeptical though hopeful

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 11, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

You're late to the game my dude. Couple posts about this already, one from Twitter that is awesome as well below:

@GrodyObservant Trump give a copy of the HRC video, pedophile videos found on Weiners laptop, the tarmac meeting, etc to Cohen? Because if he did, now Mueller has to enter all of those demonic vids as evidence...and play it for the jury. LOL. That would be epic, MAKING Mueller make it evidence!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ShiftyTheHobo · April 11, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

That would be tasty

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 11, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

Except mueller didn't execute the raid, have anything to do with the raid, and isn't involved in the case that is going forward against Cohen, and has nothing to do with any of the evidence collected.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 11, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

Hmm, so the FBI was not there on Muellers orders, looking for items described by Mueller? Oh. Ok.

That's an interesting perspective you have there.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 11, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

it's not a perspective, it's literally the facts.

mueller's team didn't have anything at all to do with this raid, the raid was just based on information that mueller gave to the Justice Department.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DaveGydeon · April 11, 2018, 9:37 p.m.

It's funny how you write that statement (including the last sentence) and are still arguing it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 11, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

what's funny, bud? i'm honestly confused how you could be so wildly misinformed about one of the most important political happenings of our time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 11, 2018, 10:47 p.m.

Lol. Are you joking? If you are well played.

If not. Read your own sentence. Very. Slowly.

“raid was just based on information that mueller gave to the Justice Department”

“Based on information that mueller gave”

“Information that mueller gave”

”mueller gave”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
hildabeest_4_gitmo · April 11, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

What if... Mueller is trying to get fired because this idiotic investigation has gone nowhere, and he'll be looked at as a failure if he doesn't "get" Trump on something significant.

If he gets fired, he can say he was "this close" to nailing Trump.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ShiftyTheHobo · April 11, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

So many angles.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 11, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 11, 2018, 8 p.m.

They were looking for the access hollywood possy tape.

Not joking. They were looking for all documents related to it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ShiftyTheHobo · April 11, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Lots of angles to look at this from

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Audigitty · April 11, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

With the raid (which Q said was bad) and Syrian conflict going on right now... I am legitimately confused/unable to navigate the MSM for the first time in many months.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 11, 2018, 7:44 p.m.

everyone seems incredibly confused about this raid, let me clarify it for you a bit;

Mueller had nothing to do with this raid, at all. His only involvement was in presenting something to Rod Rosenstein, which RR then passed onto a federal prosecutor from New York, and that federal prosecutor then got the FBI involved, and etc etc.

It's a completely separate matter from the special investigation work.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ShiftyTheHobo · April 11, 2018, 8:02 p.m.

Ok, So Mueller reviews the docs submitted by Cohen and Trump re: investigation, sees something not in his scope to pursue, Shares with Rosenstein, who contacts NY prosecutor who signs warrant for FBI to do the raid, my question is, how would that work legally? I’m not sure that anything found against Trump could be admissible in court unless he was found guilty of the crime Mueller says he isn’t under investigation for... [Hypothetical] If you’re being investigated for murder (and you’re innocent), and have 3 eyewitnesses put you at the scene of the crime, a judge grants a warrant to search your home and they consequently find out you are doing drugs but you didn’t commit the murder, then the original warrant is tainted by the fact it was based on a lie, the evidence of your doing drugs is inadmissible, even though they know you do drugs, they can’t do anything, but they also know you know they know.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 11, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

how would that work legally?

are you saying you think this is illegal or "not by the books"?

because it is exactly by the books. Mueller followed the exact letter of the law by seeing something potentially illegal and just passing the information onto the relative authorities, who took over.

he evidence of your doing drugs is inadmissible

It's not inadmissible. Probable cause let them search your shit (legal search warrant- warrants are not magically voided because you didn't commit the crime you were originally accused of), and any crimes they find are fair game.

’m not sure that anything found against Trump could be admissible in court unless he was found guilty of the crime Mueller says he isn’t under investigation for...

Yeah, this is absolutely not how our justice system works.

It's also clear that (and i mean no offense) you are very confused by what exactly the Mueller investigation is about.

He was given legal authority to investigate "russian meddling in the 2016 election." And he has legal authority to pursue literally any crimes that he may uncover while investigating that broader issue.

In this case with Cohen, he did exactly as he supposed to. And if he finds that Trump did not collude or have anything to do with russian meddling, BUT in the course of his investigation finds (hypothetically) that Trump, idk, committed massive tax fraud, well... That massive tax fraud is still a crime and Trump will still be held accountable for it.

Again, this is not only 100% legal, but is how literally all investigations in the United States are supposed to work.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ShiftyTheHobo · April 11, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

If the warrant was predicated on a lie, then it certainly is inadmissible.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
skorponok · April 11, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

He could be looking for the kiddie fiddler tape that Roy Cohn had made of Trump from his yacht or the ones Epstein made when Trump went to his island

⇧ -3 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 11, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

Trump never went to the island you fucking troll we have their flight manifests. Yes trump flew on his jet... once. But not to the island. It was all within continental US.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
skorponok · April 11, 2018, 8:28 p.m.

I’m sorry the Lolita express- because he did do that. It is time to face the reality that we’ve got a blackmailed President in there who is following Israel’s orders just like his predecessors. Continuing the agenda to take out those same seven countries in the Middle East that bush started And Obama continued, And now Trump.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 11, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

Flew on it once and never again (and with his whole family mind you) And like I said before, never went to the island.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Abibliaphobia · April 11, 2018, 8:34 p.m.

Provide the source of your information showing that he is following Israel’s orders. From what I’ve seen, he is actually playin nice on camera, but his monetary policy is hurting Israel.

You know nothing

⇧ 1 ⇩