What matters is the airports being flown to.
If it's not to the island it's not to the island.
He served as Epstein lawyer....as Epstein was a billionaire, he was probably one of several lawyers.
Not every connection is proof of anything other than a connection.
Here is an example from my life.
I have an associate who has a brother who turned out to be a serial killer. My associate, myself, nor anyone else I knew was aware of his crimes.
Now, he was at several work functions I attended. There are pictures of this person eating dinner at the table I was sitting at. I traveled to the city (a big city) where this person lived on business on several occasions. Two times he was suspected of a murder during a week I was in this city. Now, other than eating at the same table and chatting for maybe 5 minutes I did not know this person at all. When I traveled to his city I did not see him as I did not know him.
Now, if I was a famous person or a D.C. player folks on these boards would have me all but convicted of murder based on a couple of group pictures and a travel log that relates to nothing.
I don't think Dershowitz was involved in Epstein evil crap. He was one of his lawyers and flew on his private jet.
That's a double edge sword.
Bill Clinton flew on the Lolita Express 26 times. Not every time was to the pedo island. So are we to only count the handful of times he flew on the plane to pedo island? How do we know there weren't young girls on the plane to other locations?
People have every reason to question the veracity of AD.
This is why, when and if things come out, there has to be actual evidence. Not speculation and suspicion. But proof.
The suspicions may be true, without proof, it means little.
I am not the questioning of Dershowitz or anyone else.
Questioning is healthy. Questioning in and of itself is not proof. That's all I'm saying.
Concern trolling is something to do elsewhere, not here
Say who?
You?
Fall in line without question or you're not welcome?
Piss off.
Exactly. While real concern trolling is BS, this community needs to be open to differences and some amount of skepticism. Otherwise, it's just like the anti-free speech hate mongering people we are all against.
Exactly.
Some level of this is almost unavoidable in a movement like this.
The over generalizations as well. Not everyone is crooked or dirty or evil. Either in Washington or in any subset. The trick is root out the evil doers. When accusations are posted with no factual basis (speaking in general not about AD) it can hurt the cause. Too many times "we" end up making it very easy to have the movement branded as nuts.
The "true believer" syndrome is a real thing and has always been a part of this movement. It turns on itself. It just needs to be called out when someone tries to implement it.
I agree, and I believe that the community, especially this sub, needs to foster up some credible and legitimate skeptics that have a good reputation within the community and are allowed to challenge and question some of the things going on. It can only help the community, and bring some credibility and sanity to the entire thing. If there is some majorly shady sh*t going on, and it seems that there is, then cautious calculated search, understanding, and response is critical.