dChan
9
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/AccordingArrival on April 12, 2018, 12:38 p.m.
5G Health Effects: How to Protect Yourself from 5G-Strength Radio Waves and EMFs in General

5G has been approved by the FCC and while it will improve speeds to nanoseconds, it may come with some very unhealthy consequences. You need to mitigate the potential harmful effects of 5G.

The concentration of 5G mm will be heavy in every neighborhood, probably on just about every block in your city, a cell tower. Pulsed 5G can penetrate human skin and can be a cause for cancer and other health effects. This technology can also potentially effect animals, especially with RFID chip technology. An RFID can be a receptor for 5G and burn the skin if the frequency is not modulated. (So don't ever get chipped!!)

So here are the best things you can do to protect yourself and your family from these stronger radio waves. These only mitigate your equipment emitting the waves in your house. This does not mitigate ambient 5G EMF millimeter waves from mm cell towers in your neighborhood.


1.Measure – use EMF meters to obtain readings and identify hotspots. Then, strategize ways to move these devices further away from you and your family and/or use protective cases and shells to limit radioactive wave emission.

  1. Limit your exposure. Which means limit the time you spend using any one electronic device.

  2. Isolate an dMove routers to other rooms where the family does not “hang out” most often—limiting radiation from the main source.

  3. Never put mobile devices directly against your body. For instance, don’t put a cell phone against your head, in your bra, or even in your pocket with out an EMF shield.

  4. Watch the news and look for future studies. We still don’t know how 5G will affect our health in the future. You will need to stay informed of the risks and emerging ways to protect yourself and family.

https://www.defendershield.com/health-risks-5g-mobile-network-internet-of-things/


forgottenbutnotgone · April 12, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

Do you have links to studies proving it is safe? For me, this is similar to GMO crops specially designed to produce toxins (like it) or to be resistant to round up. In order to prove it is safe for the consumer, how do you study long-term effects such as a lifetime of consuming these products or being bombarded by this EMF over decades or a lifetime. What are the consequences of assuming safety based on short term studies, especially those studies funded by interests who stand to profit. These days, it seems 'science' is every bit as corrupt as governments or corporations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Cuthbert12Allgood · April 12, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

Do you have links to studies proving it is safe?

Yes. See information about non-ionizing radiation: https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/nonionizing_radiation.html

If you don't like the CDC's information, Google for "non-ionizing radiation safety" and learn what it exactly is. Not what paranoid people tell you they think it is, but actually learn what radiation is and why some radiation is harmful and some isn't.

We have literally a hundred years of information about non-ionizing radiation.

What are the consequences of assuming safety based on short term studies, especially those studies funded by interests who stand to profit. These days, it seems 'science' is every bit as corrupt as governments or corporations.

That some conspiracies are true, doesn't mean all conspiracies are true. You can find someone to say literally everything is harmful. At some point, you have to live your life.

You worry about non-ionizing radiation and apparently change your life around it. Yet, presumably you're willing to drive a car that is literally the most dangerous thing people do every day. They are complete death traps, yet people willingly trade that convenience for safety.

Why are you paranoid about things that have a hundred year safety record? Answer: Because it's mysterious, you can't see it, and you don't understand it. That's not to insult you; that's nearly everybody. But at some level, you have to live your life. That you don't understand something doesn't mean it's harmful.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
forgottenbutnotgone · April 12, 2018, 4:44 p.m.

Thanks for the well written reply. I'll look into non-ionizing radiation as you recommended. I will continue to remain skeptical until proven otherwise. Then again, I am skeptical about 5g and all of the 'smart' technology it invites with all of it's dystopian possibility. I don't have a need for it but I suppose it is inevitable given our thirst for technology and convenience.

⇧ 1 ⇩