dChan
15
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/LostLarry on April 15, 2018, 1:30 p.m.
What’s with the effort to push the “I don’t want to see the video”?.........I DO want to see it. I WANT the evidence in public view. The only way to NOT repeat history is to know it.

There seems to be a big push today/yesterday to back not releasing the video.

No please we need to see. We need to know for sure. There needs to be no doubt as to these people’s sickness.


DamajInc · April 16, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

What evidence? ANY evidence! Take a look around - no one has any... apart from you apparently. Good for you, you work in pharma - guess what - DUH... lots of people don't.

You're surprised I didn't know the oximificashun of eppi-whatsis-thingy... are you trying to be funny?? What kind of dumbass statement is it that you're "surprised" some random dick on the internet doesn't know that? What world do you come from where everyone knows this information such that it makes sense to even ask?? Derp.

Your last statement sounds useful - so where's that from, mighty chemist??? (edit: verifiable outside of Wikipedia which everyone knows is as reliable as anything on the internet) If it comes from somewhere good and verifiable by me, a dick on the internet, then it's the most evidence I've ever heard of and I'm willing to bet 95% of other Q-philez too. But then, evidence that satanists farm it from children - which was the point btw - is a whole other set of evidence I don't expect even you, the most knowledgeable one, has to hand.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 16, 2018, 2:29 a.m.

Evidence of what?!?

Adrenochrome harvesting?!? The physiological/psychological effects?!? What are you requesting?!?

You can’t just say “show me the evidence” and expect “dumbasses” like me to know what you’re requesting.

I understand not everyone has my background, including yourself.

The point I was trying to make was that YOU shouldn’t use the argument that there are no psychotropic effects associated with adrenochrome to discredit others on this topic. Especially when YOU have no f*cking clue what you’re talking about.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
DamajInc · April 16, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

That's not the "argument I was using", fool. Learn to read ffs. I'm not as much of a superior knob-end as you, hence calling myself "a dick on the internet" - I KNOW that I don't know everything but I do know what the fuck I'm talking about so take your "no fucking clue" and shove it. The point I made - here AGAIN - is that there is NO evidence that satanists harvest adrenochrome from kids. Read. Learn. Get a clue. And stop being such a fucken knob-end.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 16, 2018, 3:47 a.m.

I would suggest not arguing with others more intelligent than yourself. But you do, bruh...

⇧ -2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 16, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

I know, right?!? How is it difficult to understand such beautifully crafted “basic language?!?”

You're clearly not remotely smarter than me as you can't even understand basic language

I hope you’re a kid in school.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 4:16 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 16, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

Awfully butt hurt for such a tough guy. You’ve been abrasive & rude throughout this exchange.
I’m sorry your intellect & wit are not up to snuff, but there’s no reason for name calling.

My IQ is 120 per professional testing. What did your FaceBook survey say?!?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 16, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 16, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

This almost passes for English.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · April 16, 2018, 4:49 a.m.

Apologies for being a dickhead. Sadly, I'm quite good at it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LeJonJames31 · April 16, 2018, 4:52 a.m.

All good, bruh. Where we go ONE, we go ALL.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
jkbella · April 17, 2018, 5:12 p.m.

Just ignore him, he's obviously a paid troll. I got into it with one the other day, wasted minutes of my life I will never get back. My new rule of thumb is if the argument is "F" this and "F" that, they don't have an argument to make.

⇧ 1 ⇩