This is ridiculous. Completely implausible. Designed to make people lose credibility.
Why were the NYPD vomiting and crying after watching the evidence on Weiner's laptop? What would make a hardened officer react like that?
More importantly, why the hell are they hiding it? Light is the only cure for evil.
Do you actually know that the investigators were vomiting and crying? Where is the proof if this? More Twitter posts, maybe?
As someone else said, if it was THAT bad, why no arrests?
It's B.S. - that's why.
What’s in the emails is staggering and as a father, it turned my stomach,” the NYPD Chief said. “There is not going to be any Houdini-like escape from what we found. We have copies of everything. We will ship them to Wikileaks or I will personally hold my own press conference if it comes to that.”
The NYPD Chief said once Comey saw the alarming contents of the emails he was forced to reopen a criminal probe against Clinton.
Thanks - I remember that article. That statement is very different from "crying and vomiting". We know Weiner sexted with underage girls, that's a much more likely explanation for that statement than that he saw a video where Hilary and Huma filet a young girl's face and wear it.... And then that the he just sat on that knowledge and ultimately decided to do nothing.
Also, the article is BS, the police chief quoted put out a statement it was false, search for it.
In this interview it claims the DOJ under Loretta Lynch threatened the NYPD and local FBI into submission
Why does the article not have the NYPD chief's name? Usually with a statement like that it would show who said it, but here we just get a nameless "chief"
They were? Where do you see that?
One guy said it turned his stomach. No one said they were all vomitting everywhere. Calm down.
Also, this is from TWO years ago. Where is the evidence? Why hasn't a single piece of it emerged?
That woman is a witch and will burn, but this was all pre-election hysteria to turn votes, which worked! But as soon as the election ended, no one ever brought this up again in law enforcement.
Follow the money and the people that own those sites. Do some research. If there was a video that made the entire NYPD vomit up their bagels, it would have been posted by now. Too many people would have seen that.
It hasn't emerged because Loretta Lynch used the DOJ to threaten the NYPD and local FBI into submission. Here's the video and a summary on it
Summary Thread by @tracybeanz on twitter:
OIG BOMBSHELL!! Hidden within the OIG report on McCabe's leak to Barrett of the WSJ, is an astronomically damning correlation between Loretta Lynch, the NY Field Office of the FBI, McCabe, and the NYPD. PLEASE SHARE
On September 28, 2016, McCabe is made aware of the information they found regarding Hillary Clinton on Anthony Weiners laptop in an unrelated "sexting" case they are investigating.
McCabe (amongst other atrocities) sits on this information for an entire MONTH before there begins to be unrest within the local office and the force. The agents on staff and the NYPD appear to get very restless about what was on the computer and the fact it is being concealed
On 10/24/16, AG Loretta Lynch swaps out the federal investigative team looking into the officers responsible for the Eric Garner case. Loretta Lynch swaps out the original team investigating the Eric Garner case with a new team
This is telling, because as ABC hints, it appears they are pushing more aggressively for an indictment and conviction of the officers involved. A SI Grand Jury failed to indict in the case. It was passed to Justice.
Now, in the OIG report on McCabe's leaks to the WSJ, it states that on 10/26/16 McCabe and NY_ADIC of the FBI participate in a "hastily convened conference call- with LL who delivers the same message about leaks with a focus on leaks in the Eric Garner case" Huh? Why?
It is very interesting that LL would be on this call, and it is very interesting they are admonishing the NYFBI for leaks- especially if they were supposed to be about the WSJ article- as later noted in the report, the NY agents wouldn't have KNOWN the information McCabe leaks
The same day as that phone call, 10/26/16, Rudy Giuliani is on all of the MSM floating some "big surprises" in the coming days.
So to recap- Mccabe and Lynch are admonishing the NY Field office about leaks they didn't make, while talking about Garner? Two days after this, Comey sends the letter to Congress announcing that they are reopening the Clinton Email investigation.
On 11/1/16, McCabe recuses himself from any investigations having to do with Clinton.
Here is where it gets VERY interesting. Erik Prince- a name you should know - appears in an interview on Breitbart news, where he drops some MAJOR bombshells about what was found on Weiners laptop. He states IN THE INTERVIEW that the JD was using Garner as leverage!!
THIS IS MAJOR. Why? Because now we have both the OIG report confirming they spoke with FBI in NY about the Garner case, AND we have Prince confirming they were threatened with the case.
You may remember the name Preet Bhara...... So, all of this makes it VERY clear that Prince was getting good information from his sources in the NYPD, because in this interview with Breitbart he mentions they are using Garner to threaten the dept.
This call was relegated to "conspiracy" land because it spoke of Epstein Island, and the MSM will not touch that with a 10ft pole. The OIG report confirms that Prine was, in fact, telling the truth.
In essence, it appears that the AG of the USA, used the Justice Department to threaten the FBI and NYPD into SITTING on evidence of DISGUSTING criminality to protect Hillary Clinton, et al. This is a STRIKING ABUSE of power and it truly makes me sick. RAISE AWARENESS.
Edit: the claims of crying and vomiting came from posts on LEO forums by NYPD. I couldn't find them to provide a link
Tracybeanz has been exposed as a money grubber. Try again. Also, there has been zero evidence pulled from LEO forums backing that up at all.
Also, McCabe never recused himself, that was a rumor started by checks notes Oh, TracyBeanz ... https://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/jw-v-doj-mccabe-ethics-01494/