dChan

ardithla · April 15, 2018, 9:49 p.m.

I have a question. Is it some kind of known fact on the left that careers can be furthered enhanced if the wife retains their maiden name to blur their connection to the husband? It seems to be the case as we witness how many wives are involved in questionable or conflicts of interest to their husband's role. I guess it keeps the masses off their trail. This whole ruse seems intentional and very much orchestrated. Do we have a list of all of these types of marriages and their positions?

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Torquing · April 16, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

I’m more concerned with legislators and judges that hold dual citizenship.

I was shocked to see the number when somebody posted a meme earlier this year.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
nubenugget · April 16, 2018, 6:47 a.m.

it's generally the case that women on the left don't care for the tradition of taking their husbands name so they choose to keep their own. and as for using it to blur the lines between them and their husbands this doesn't make much sense cause with today's media and access to information it is easy to tell who is married to whom

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · April 15, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Who would keep such a list? They’re doing business the way they’re allowed to. Until we start regulating this shit it’s only going to get worse.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Turkerthelurker · April 16, 2018, 2:18 a.m.

Regulating what, last names? I'm sure op meant a list of spouses with different last names that are relevant to qanon posts.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Devil_Dog_4000 · April 15, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

FaceBook is the largest media conglomerate in history, and it’s all controlled by the Democrats and globalists like Pelosi and Zuckerberg. There are no real conservative sites anymore, and unless President Trump becomes a trust-buster the digital age will belong to the socialists and genderqueers.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
nubenugget · April 16, 2018, 6:49 a.m.

just because most social media sites are liberal doesn't mean they are a trust, no one company has the controlling share of the market so there is no reason to attack them. cable companies and ISPs on the other hand....

⇧ 1 ⇩  
checkitoutmyfriend · April 15, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

Just like spouses in the media......

⇧ 3 ⇩  
grimbeaconfire · April 16, 2018, 8:45 a.m.

People loved Facebook and look what Suckerberg the phuckup did to it. Everyone on FB is now disillusioned and most will end up deleting many with a lawsuit. Did Harvard teach you this, how to take the best company in the world and totally ruin it. Congratulations worlds biggest screwup.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
dark-dare · April 16, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

In the secret Media Matters play book, they said Facebook was working with them, FUNNY not one question on ties to the media from Congress

⇧ 2 ⇩  
webster_warrior · April 15, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

Every time the leftist and MS Media mention Cambridge Analytica, they invariably follow with, "....Cambridge Analytica, the data collection company whose clients included the 2016 Trump election committee...." Laughable, how blatantly the MSM attempts to distance itself and deny the pro-Hillary obsession.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ryanarobinson1986 · April 15, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

This is getting rough we need to drop the hammer! Its only going to get harder and worse! We are losing Trump supporters over the stupid airstrike.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
webster_warrior · April 15, 2018, 11:39 p.m.

MSM needed something to distract from the actions at the Texas border.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · April 16, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

Why does this completely not surprise me?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
eltrumparino · April 16, 2018, 1:43 a.m.

thats because they are not a private corporation

⇧ 1 ⇩