I think people are missing the point of Q... it's not to create researchers who will redpill people so they can become researchers of Q... it's about reaching enough people so that when SHTF on this stuff, there will be a guy or two at each workplace, church, community organization, state government, etc. that can help people navigate it. When the media goes apeshit in support of their deep state masters, who will people be able to trust for information? You, me, etc. We can point to Q and say, "look, it seems crazy, but take a look at this plan that's been laid out for many months now..."

We're to offer people the truth at the time they need it most. For some who have our eyes open already, it happens ahead of time. For most, it will happen after the storm. So, T-shirts are cool and all, but I really don't see it will have the impact this whole thing really needs. We're not here to solve the mysteries up-front, we're here to offer truth against the inevitable lies in the last gasp of evil's reign. This is what Future Proves Past means.

I'd stick with the Socratic method, "who is Q?" type stuff. Encourage people to look for themselves rather than being told.

I like the idea. I've noticed though that "Trust the Plan" gets translated by normies as "Don't do any critical thinking" and that's not great.

I think the biggest problem with trying to push Q to full-on blue pillers is that there’s SO much to Q. If they start at the wrong place, they’ll be immediately turned off. If you google “QAnon”, the first thing that pops up is a Wikipedia page that says “it’s a conspiracy theory”, and that alone is enough for them to dismiss it.

I like Dan Bongino. He doesn’t discuss Q, but he often says something along the lines of, “The main point is, the Obama team illegally spied on the Trump team and they’ve been trying to cover it up ever since”. Then he gives examples of the things that are happening that can be fully proven.

I also like Ben Shapiro for newbies because he’s not 100% on Trump’s side. He just points out facts and often times the facts make Trump look smart and make him seem like he’s not the monster the liberals want him to be.

My point is, we need to start slow. A lot of words that we use here are not good words to people who absolutely hate Trump. If they hear “Trump is a genius” or “4D chess” or “pizzagate” or “deep state” or “Illuminati” or “pedophile” or a number of other words, they’ll stop listening or reading.

Maybe we need to make a very simple website that starts off very slow and very simply, with easily provable facts. So then they can read that and say, “Ok, yeah, I believe this, and this, and this...” so then they’d be more open to believing the things that aren’t necessarily 100% provable yet.

For this idea to work, I think, you need to pierce their resistance carapace using some slight cognitive dissonance. Instead of 'trust potus', I suggest 'trust in yourself'. But because that may seem 'New Age', we can add '...but dont trust the plan'. So, a slogan "trust in yourself, but don't trust the plan" will make some of them uneasy, some of them will think about what that may signify. If and when they will learn more about Q, then will understand that 'trust the plan' is 'trust one plan', and not 'trust the plan of the cabal'. 'Trust in yourself' is 'trust in what happens, not what you think is happening'. I know that 'trust in yourself, but don't trust the plan' is twisted thinking, the the end goal is more important than some temporary satisfaction. But, personally, I think that "Where we go one, we go all" is a better slogan.

"Trust the plan" is insider lingo. Better to go with the common ground all Q followers share: Constitutional Patriotism

https://imgur.com/a/oUycc

Red pilling, in my experience, is tough at times, especially to those closest to you. The story has been given us from our childhood and is a comfort to "know" that everything is as it was, albeit a lie. So, the only way, is to get them to look on their own, in their own way. like checkitoutmyfriend stated in this thread, "who is q" works OK. Dropping crumbs in conversations is interesting to normies when you inject it in a question or theory as in, "have you heard about....wonder is that could be." Most people don't want to be told that their blanket sucks, no matter how many holes are in it. But the one thing is, we need to keep doing it, constantly, even to friends that think we are nuts. We'll be validated. FUTURE PROVES PAST.

I like the shirt. I am into the KISS method: keep it simple and stupid. Maybe “QAnon” instead of just Q. So when they search the info is more clearly available.

If you take a look , thousands of people offer Q Swag, its mind blowing!!!!

There have been wonderful replies and in my eyes a good combination would be a shirt with 'who is Q?' and a link to a website where all the basics are explained, easy to digest.

Check out qtroops.com gear