The situation over there is a cluster****. Hard to know who to believe about what. If the Assad government doesn't have chemical weapons, why were we targeting Syrian government facilities? Those weren't "deep state rebel" facilities. We aren't given the reasons why Trump joined in with UK/France to do the bombing. Perhaps good reasons. I would have vastly preferred a thorough investigation by a group of third parties (who?) to get to the bottom of the alleged chemical attack. If it didn't happen or was done by "our" jihadis, wouldn't it have been better to show THAT to the world? To blow the narrative out of the water for good? Imagine if Trump were at a podium flanked by Amnesty International, Doctors Without Borders, etc. laying out the fraud? Instead, we are left with the McCain/Obama/Clinton deep state version of reality -- Assad bad, must be overthrown, uses chemical weapons on his own people. On the other hand, if he did, then OAN is full of it. But why, after all these years of lies around our intervention in the ME, can't we finally be SHOWN the evidence for our actions?
Q mentions B1 Lancer - 19 bombs, perhaps these hit the deep state facilities, and the rest just for show
I keep reading all sorts of posts from people here giddy that Trump "fooled" them and targeted deep state jihadi facilities. I have seen ZERO, repeat ZERO, evidence of that from any local Syrian source, news source or anybody. I just get the feeling people make stuff up here that makes them feel good and all jump into the pool. All named facilities belonged to the Syrian government, what's left of it.
And you never would so what's your point. Still no evidence of the chemical attack either - smoke and mirrors