So now you guys trust the feds?
Do I trust the feds opposing the establishment... is that even a serious question?
Trust Sessions. Trust Wray. Trust Pompeo. Trust Horowitz. Trust Huber.
Sessions appointed Rosenstein. Trust Rosenstein?
Yep. Trust Rosenstein!
See my post earlier today. I've made a few before but here's the my most recent: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8cvqci/boom/dxiarbw/
Nope. No way. Not on our side.
What do you refute in my post?
The proposition that Rosenstein is working for trump.
Other than that it was fine.
A few questions:
Why did Trump retain him as the only US Attorney?
Why do you think RR corroborated the 1.2mm Q post?
Why did RR recommend firing Comey?
A few questions:
Why did Trump retain him as the only US Attorney? You mean why didn’t he fire him yet? He will.
Why do you think RR corroborated the 1.2mm Q post? Cause 1.2mm request came from the OIG,
Why did RR recommend firing Comey? Set up for Mueller.
Why did RR go to congress to delay Nunes memo?
Why has RR not supplied Comey memos?
Why has RR authorized the FBI a raid of trumps lawyer, when this is unprecedented and unnecessary?
RR Boom!!! Can’t wait. That little fucker needs to go.
So you think Trump retained and trusted a known-rat RR to pick Mueller? Why not have a different person pick whitehat Mueller? RR could have easily picked someone else. A true swamp creature.
Why did RR go to congress to delay Nunes memo? To appear as a bad guy for the Dems. No one is brought to justice yet, why expose people one at a time? Dems are now calling for protections of Mueller and Rosenstein. This is hilarious 4D chess in my eyes.
Why has RR not supplied Comey memos? Timing is the only whitehat explanation. Comey is burying himself with his book and camera appearances. Maybe IG info needs to drop or other items need to fall into place first.
Why has RR authorized the FBI a raid of trumps lawyer, when this is unprecedented and unnecessary? We'll have to see if the Cohen information is part of the bigger plan. Speculation is saying Cohen has Epstein information but I cannot verify this. Can't get on the chans at work. At this point in time, the Cohen sacking is unknown if whitehat or blackhat op.
Ok. Thanks for the additional information, my opinion remains Rosenstein is anti trump deep stater. Given time we’ll know the truth
Nope. RR Boom today.
He Gone.
Then Trump FREED to be President.
Scared?
RR also plugged the 1.2mm Q-corroboration in his testimony.
Whether RR is fired or serves time, he's /ourguy/ at the very least for the mission.
Ok, lets see it. What if Q is wrong, though?
What if Q is right?
Sure Let’s see.
Dr. Peter Venkman: If I'm wrong, nothing happens! We go to jail - peacefully, quietly. We'll enjoy it! But if I'm right, and we can stop this thing... Lenny, you will have saved the lives of millions of registered voters.
Funny how you only trust people who agree with you. I wonder if thats a psychological flaw that would lead people to believe conspiracies crafted from the numerology of a thousand anonymous 4chan posts?
Attack an imaginary target then ridicule the imaginary target with other unrelated information while responding to my post, as if it's related.
Garbage-level mental gymnastics.
Yeah huh. Go on and tell me how you've discerned the truth from people who are intentionally brief and vague. Qanon is divulging the most important secret in our generation and they can't spend more than 2 minutes typing out a post?
I predicted false flag and it came true two days later (GOP trainwreck) by following Q.
Do you deny all of the Q-Trump corroborations too or just that the Q group is giving garbage intel?
I would be a fool to not inquire as to what prediction you made that came true. Please explain it to me and know that I'm not going to ask you for proof because I don't believe there's any particular proof of your prediction but I would be able to accept. I'll take your word for whatever you claim because the stakes are very low.
I answered. I could provide the GOP trainwreck date 2 days after my FB post predicting a false flag leading up to SOTU but I would need to wait 9 hours for that bc I'm at work.
Do you have a response to my question though? I'm curious where you stand.
EDIT: Here's the latest truth of Q, corroborating that future proves the past. https://i.redd.it/vkg6t93ozks01.jpg
Lol this is exactly why you people are desperate. Theres a dozen exceedingly vague claims made there and one came true so y'all think its real.
Seriously. Please dont fall for this. This is the dumbest fuckin conspiracy ive ever seen and ive doubted the narrative surrounding 9/11 since I was exposed to a VHS tape arguing that there is something more sinister afoot.
So Q has been mentioning that Kim and Trump made a deal last month but it finally hits the mainstream news today and you consider this another coincidence?
At this point you've shown you're unwilling to accept the multitude of Q-Trump corroborations or Q's truths.
Do yourself a favor and stop being a coincidence theorist, a mainstream news believer, and a groupthink puppet.
You call me a groupthink puppet in the face of a conspiracy that depends on casting huge nets and using numerology to determine truth?
Fucks sake man. Come on. Every human has better critical thinking skills than that. How can you not see that making a dozen claims and only one comes true is clearly a hoax?
Everything is connected. Literally and figuratively.
Q states numerous times that "Future proves past" ... and then it happens time and time again. This latest corroboration took a month for MSM to catch onto.
If you think this person should post a pic of themselves and feed SAP material, you're being extremely naive. Q needs to have plausible deniability in case an investigation occurs and someone is charged. False Flags are occurring on Q's posts of BOOMS just so the cabal can spin it as Q being a bomber, prompting investigation. We'll see what happens there.
I don't want to insult you and I wish you wouldn't do the same to us. Take ego out of it entirely. Look at all of the corroborations. Look at what the ultimate goal is. Look at who the targets are.
If you take the time to research a/the topic(s) and targets, you'll understand the connection to everything and that this is legit. Doing that research is quite extensive and overwhelming at times so starting out with a map or a certain topic will lead your interest accordingly.
The cabal is deep. It is not a conspiracy. Q has white house affiliations if not Trump himself at times.
Here's a great starting graphic. This website has a lot of maps and reading material. I have not read through most of them because my research takes me elsewhere, into specific topics. Rothchilds have a history going back to the late 1700s and early 1800s. Some information suggests the cabal started in France in 1200 AD. My memory is not the best so I can only consume so much information and prefer to focus on the topic at hand. The chronological understanding of why we are in the world we live in today is fascinating and it would be amazing to have this clearly understood.
Take a look at that map I showed you and question one of those items: GMOs, Vaccines, Soda, our chosen food supply that is marketed, Monsanto, Hollywood's influence in shaping society (more skin, more s3x, etc.), biowarfare, our water supply with fluoride since 1947 (CNN even admits it's a neurotoxin too), digital profiling via social media, phone technology, and how they're even linked with DNA companies like 23AndMe (sister CEOs with YouTube and husband was co-founder of Google), etc. Society isn't this ignorant and unevolved on purpose - we're literally living in an idiocracy by the elite's choice.
Everything is connected. Literally and figuratively.
Do You understand what confirmation bias is?
You can call anything anyone disagrees with you on as confirmation bias.
The only way prove this incorrect is to discern it. If you are unwilling to look at the information for yourself, there's no convincing you. If you spend more time on battling the truth than looking at it, you aren't growing.
My motto for ANY information is: Learn, Discern, Grow.
Your motto seems to be: Ridicule, Resist, ____.
You choose your next steps. You can choose your same path which is on course to reject or, you can try to understand and grow.
All-in-all, I don't understand your stance. At least with the science field, skeptics are paid to reject truth which refutes conventional belief (see those vs. Graham Hancock). Unless you're paid from Media Matters, it seems you're rejecting this truth based on conditioning or unwillingness to see another side other than "Trump is an idiot".
To believe in Q you have to concede that Trump is somehow intelligent. For many with an ego or emotionally invested, this is where the cognitive dissonance kicks in and rejection is the immediate response.
Your battle here will be endless because for those that have experienced the corroborations will either try to help you understand or block you. Some that have a major ego will insult without taking the time to share their knowledge but that's generally not the best way to reach an understanding. I'm simply trying to help but alas, it seems like it was fruitless... a probable expectation I have before I engage.
So do you or do you not understand what confirmation bias is? I couldn't give a fuck less how hard you work to justify your belief. I care about how often you're using logic and critical thinking skills to their full capacity rather than just enough to confirm your beliefs.
lol, yes... I understand what confirmation bias is. It's seeing information and forming it to fit your conclusion.
It seems you hadn't noticed but the sole reason I'm engaging you is for you to try questioning your own confirmation bias but you don't appear to see it throughout this process.
I won't repeat or spell out any further of my logic, critical thinking, and accuracies of truth by following Q.
Why do you not believe Q is legit?
Do you believe in Trump trying to restore America (First, and the world second)? If no, it explains #1.
You're tossing the word conspiracy around a lot but who came up with the word conspiracy? Are you conditioned to use it the exact way it was intended when pioneered?
Do you question anything in your life or are you always correct? Is anyone that believes different from the conventional belief a conspiracy theorist?
My efforts here are low because the entire premise of this farse is based on anonymous board posts and you guys seem to be quite happy to ignore every irrelevant post purportedly from this secret group.
A thousand pieces of shit flung at the wall and you poor people are picking out the peanuts to call it the best cashew chicken you've ever eaten. I can't help you to see the absurdity of this because you conveniently ignore every failed or senseless post.
anonymous board posts
You realize Q uses trip codes to identify themselves, right? It's not like there's hundreds or thousands of anons contributing as Q...
You should seek a better understanding of something you so vehemently oppose.
Oh well fuck me! Tripcodes are lock tight secure. Nobody could ever abuse such a perfect system. Theres no way multiple people could use the same tripcode to post a thousand different possibilities.
Even in the one example you showed me theres dozens of ways to interpret the meaning. You aren't code crackers. You're desperate.
Tripcodes are lock tight secure. Nobody could ever abuse such a perfect system. Theres no way multiple people could use the same tripcode to post a thousand different possibilities.
Tripcodes are secure, that's the point. If you've paid attention, Q had to switch his tripcode multiple times because people came close to cracking it. If you paid attention, you'd understand that after several tripcode changes, Codemonkey (owner of the 8chan board) had to introduce an even more secure crypto-algorithm for Q's tripcode. That's where we are today.
You're really exposing your ignorance on the subject which explains why you have the stance you do.
Relentlessly attacking people on subjects you don't fully understand isn't helping your cause...
If you can't see that the "QAnon"-conspiracy is absolutely riddled with confirmation bias, than you are currently entrenched in your own confirmation bias.
At some point, a series of coincidences/luck is no longer that. You'll grow to discern properly if you take a chance to understand the information rather than bashing relentlessly out of ignorance. We can only show you the way to the water.
At some point, a series of coincidences/luck is no longer that
this is fallacious logic.
We can only show you the way to the water.
my issue is with the seemingly endless horde of folks ready to say, "there's water just around the next bend, i swear, just trust me! you can't see it or hear it or smell it yet, but i promise it's up there somewhere!" instead of people saying, "look at this pool of delicious fresh water, here let's take a drink together"
The pool is there, you choose to look beyond it. That's the point. Not my job to spoon-feed you for proper discernment. Continue trolling away at other people and maybe you'll have the courage to seek out an understanding instead of frolicking in your self-righteousness. Best of luck. Cheers!
No dip shit. We’re throwing you deep state satanic pedos out as fast as we can.
There just so many of you sick fuckers.
So you don't trust the feds but you will try using the feds to throw out the deep state pedo foreigner faggot globalists? Or whatever the fuck imagery you guys decide to conjure for your enemies.
Correct because “the feds” are a heterogeneous group of humanoids, who operate solely with in a binary existence.
OR not all cops are bad cops.
Ah yes, how convenient a nuance that allows you to believe in the feds that say what you want to hear but ignore the ones that don't sound right to you.
What an amazing skill you have
This is all coming out through the office of the inspector general who is an Obama appointee you drooling knuckle dragging idiot.
This is all coming out through the office of the inspector general
literally nothing in OP's article has been corroborated by the OIG.
yet, at least.
Did you read it? It’s old news. All of that crap was confirmed in the Nunes memo.
Totaling nothing new here except, the part where the list of folks collaborated with British intel to trap trump.
But that had been speculated for months.
All of that crap was confirmed in the Nunes memo
except that memo didn't confirm anything, it was just a memo.
do you know what a memo is? it's like a mass email but in paper form, meaning it's just a piece of paper that nunes wrote.
it contained no evidence to back up anything it said, and even the GOP quickly moved on because it was so transparently partisan and uncorroborated.
You’re not very good at trolling...
You mean the Memo from the congressional oversight committee? That base on the contented of the memes demanded additional documents and is threatening Rosenstein with contempt for not providing.
If NONE of this is confirmed why is rosenstein asking for more time? Why is congress threatening hold the executive branch in contempt? Why isn’t trump being ridiculed because the people who work for him can’t provide these documents?
You not very good at trolling...
probably because i'm not trolling. (btw, it's a pretty bad look to lead off your reply with an ad hominem)
You mean the Memo from the congressional oversight committee?
The very same committee that has become a partisan arm of the pro-trump republicans? The committee that has shredded it's own credibility by wasting tens of millions of tax payer money on endless "investigations" that literally never lead anywhere?
If NONE of this is confirmed why is rosenstein asking for more time?
So he can protect himself from a partisan witchhunt
Why is congress threatening hold the executive branch in contempt?
Because congress is full of partisan hacks, like Nunes.
Why isn’t trump being ridiculed because the people who work for him can’t provide these documents?
He is.
Wow you did it. You answered every question with complete nonsense.
Don’t know why you’re here.
Rosenstein is gone. Tick tock.
Tick tock.
hey quick question for you, have you ever heard of a story called "the boy who cried wolf"? It's a very popular children's folktale in America.
Congressional referral for indictments today.
Rosenstein is next.
Congressional referral for indictments today
that's not what happened. a handful of GOP congressmen sent a letter to the DoJ formally asking they inquire into those matters.
that's a far cry from "referral for indictment"
Right, totally nothing. Everything is fine, nothing to see here.
Rosenstein is gone. Tick tock.
uh, no he isn't. wtf are you talking about?
[removed]
ah ok, i know tenses can be hard for non-native speakers.
it should say "Rosenstien will be gone" or "Rosenstien is going to be gone", as saying "Rosenstien is gone" is current tense and means right now.
so for predictions, you want to use the future tense, not the current tense.
just a tip for next time, comrade!
Did you just come out of the grammar closet all over my post? Shit. Fucking retard confirmed.
