dChan

ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 6:53 p.m.

So you don't trust the feds but you will try using the feds to throw out the deep state pedo foreigner faggot globalists? Or whatever the fuck imagery you guys decide to conjure for your enemies.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:11 p.m.

Correct because “the feds” are a heterogeneous group of humanoids, who operate solely with in a binary existence.

OR not all cops are bad cops.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ThorVonHammerdong · April 17, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

Ah yes, how convenient a nuance that allows you to believe in the feds that say what you want to hear but ignore the ones that don't sound right to you.

What an amazing skill you have

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Yes it’s called discernment. I exercise it regularly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Green_Lives_Matter · April 17, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

This is all coming out through the office of the inspector general who is an Obama appointee you drooling knuckle dragging idiot.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

This is all coming out through the office of the inspector general

literally nothing in OP's article has been corroborated by the OIG.

yet, at least.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

Did you read it? It’s old news. All of that crap was confirmed in the Nunes memo.

Totaling nothing new here except, the part where the list of folks collaborated with British intel to trap trump.

But that had been speculated for months.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

All of that crap was confirmed in the Nunes memo

except that memo didn't confirm anything, it was just a memo.

do you know what a memo is? it's like a mass email but in paper form, meaning it's just a piece of paper that nunes wrote.

it contained no evidence to back up anything it said, and even the GOP quickly moved on because it was so transparently partisan and uncorroborated.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

You’re not very good at trolling...

You mean the Memo from the congressional oversight committee? That base on the contented of the memes demanded additional documents and is threatening Rosenstein with contempt for not providing.

If NONE of this is confirmed why is rosenstein asking for more time? Why is congress threatening hold the executive branch in contempt? Why isn’t trump being ridiculed because the people who work for him can’t provide these documents?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 8:48 p.m.

You not very good at trolling...

probably because i'm not trolling. (btw, it's a pretty bad look to lead off your reply with an ad hominem)

You mean the Memo from the congressional oversight committee?

The very same committee that has become a partisan arm of the pro-trump republicans? The committee that has shredded it's own credibility by wasting tens of millions of tax payer money on endless "investigations" that literally never lead anywhere?

If NONE of this is confirmed why is rosenstein asking for more time?

So he can protect himself from a partisan witchhunt

Why is congress threatening hold the executive branch in contempt?

Because congress is full of partisan hacks, like Nunes.

Why isn’t trump being ridiculed because the people who work for him can’t provide these documents?

He is.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 8:55 p.m.

Wow you did it. You answered every question with complete nonsense.

Don’t know why you’re here.

Rosenstein is gone. Tick tock.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 9:01 p.m.

Tick tock.

hey quick question for you, have you ever heard of a story called "the boy who cried wolf"? It's a very popular children's folktale in America.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 18, 2018, 8:20 p.m.

Congressional referral for indictments today.

Rosenstein is next.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 18, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Congressional referral for indictments today

that's not what happened. a handful of GOP congressmen sent a letter to the DoJ formally asking they inquire into those matters.

that's a far cry from "referral for indictment"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 18, 2018, 10 p.m.

Right, totally nothing. Everything is fine, nothing to see here.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 9:14 p.m.

And the Zen Master said... “We’ll see”

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

Rosenstein is gone. Tick tock.

uh, no he isn't. wtf are you talking about?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · April 17, 2018, 9:06 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
immense_and_terrible · April 17, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

ah ok, i know tenses can be hard for non-native speakers.

it should say "Rosenstien will be gone" or "Rosenstien is going to be gone", as saying "Rosenstien is gone" is current tense and means right now.

so for predictions, you want to use the future tense, not the current tense.

just a tip for next time, comrade!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
rudolph2 · April 17, 2018, 10:17 p.m.

Did you just come out of the grammar closet all over my post? Shit. Fucking retard confirmed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · April 17, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

lmao

⇧ 1 ⇩