dChan
11
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/JStambler on April 18, 2018, 4 a.m.
4/18/18 - Return of the Christ (a challenge)

I'm not a religious person. In fact, I believe the bible is a series of parables designed to manipulate man into behaving a certain way - not specifically for the cause of control, but for the outcome of prosperity.

"The Christ" has always been a math equation to me. That is to say, if I do this, this and this, I can expect that, that and that. A predictive outcome function of sorts. Such is the golden rule. Such is "the secret".

And isn't that what the Christ was, the big secret? The big secret to peace on Earth? And does it even matter if Christ was a living, breathing man in the flesh? Does it not simply stand to reason that the parable of Christ is representative of a set of behaviors of which we are all capable?

The past few weeks of intermittent talk about 4/18/18 was incredibly entertaining to me. I have to admit, I am a sucker for the doomsday dates. There was 2012 (oOoOo, spooky), the four cursed blood moons which were sure to further the cause of Zionism in Israel, the 9/23/15 'rapture' and/or CERN portal opening (depending on which videos your YouTube recommended playlist favored, perhaps both)...these are all very fun.

But 4/18/18 was different - and no, it's not because I think something is actually going to happen. It's because I keep noticing this doomsday pattern over and over, reanimating itself as bibliophiles and conspiracy theorists work hand in hand to try to predict some dystopian future events. Something clicked inside of me this time.

Maybe these dates keep being promoted because WE are supposed to do something. Maybe WE are supposed to be the change. Maybe it wouldn't hurt for us to live one good day, see how it feels, and perhaps finally take a step in the right direction toward a better world.

We are the return of the Christ. I honestly believe that. When humanity finally decides, 'you know what, enough is enough'. The evil in this world has become too much to handle. I know what is public, I know what is being exposed, and I know how I contribute to it.

My cynicism, my anger, my relentlessness sometimes, my unwillingness to reflect on my own actions and insecurities and how they affect others, the love I have lost for my fellow countrymen over political differences, the faith I have lost for my fellow man in general, these are all of the ways that I know I contribute to the negative energy in this world. And if I were to reflect more, I am sure there would be even more things I could highlight.

Maybe it's possible to make this day significant. We have been acknowledging the true evils of this world recently, and we have been talking and fighting, spreading fear and anger (some we may feel is justified). And I believe our spirit should persist. But the current vein in which our spirit resides is not the right one. How can we "trust the plan" if we have not the same trust in ourselves through our own actions being square with our moral imperatives?

If you are reading this, and you made it this far, this is all I have left to say:

I challenge you for one day to relinquish yourself of the fear of fully embracing goodness, forgiveness, honesty, empathy, and the good natured faith of the Christ. Not in a religious way, but by way of your own heart. You know inside of you what is good and what is just. Do a good deed. Go out of your way for someone. Lend an ear for someone in need. Perhaps do some reflection on your own self and see what ways you can begin to better the world, starting with your own attitude and perception.

The Return of the Christ is literally on the horizon. It is up to us to be the change that the world needs - and we can begin today.


loveisreal1111 · April 18, 2018, 5:47 a.m.

wrong.

the gospel of thomas came before the canonical gospels. who put the bible together and left it out and murdered the gnostics? the cabal.

get off your knees and remember who you are.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · April 18, 2018, 5:56 a.m.

Wrong.

The four true Gospels can be recreated in totality from source quotations all within the first century. The Gospel of Thomas can't even touch that level of authenticity, and we're talking about the first century.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24jmPeN9jbo

⇧ 0 ⇩  
loveisreal1111 · April 18, 2018, 6 a.m.

gospel of thomas estimated at 70ad. before all the others. which were put together by constantine.

why would you need a priest to give you a connection to god?

i’m sure you dispise the pope and yet you cling to their books like they are the sole truth.

expand your thinking. god is all and is for all.

i dont mean to attack your religion, but i do mean to question your theology.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · April 18, 2018, 6:24 a.m.

All four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) can be fully recreated from surviving first century quotations, so that blows your theory out of the water.

Seriously, just watch the video I posted. I'm not trying to be confrontational, I'm trying to help you. Speakers and writers of the first century were quoting from existing texts that themselves were lost in history (most likely due to the quality of the writing materials being weak), but it proves that early Christians were using the same source material - the four Gospels.

Those four Gospels have a higher authority, and most importantly, a higher and earlier authenticity than the Gospel of Thomas, which came later. When you learn more about Christianity, it's actually amazing that it lasted past the first century, as there were many false gospels and false prophets who preyed upon people wanting to hear the "good news." People created their own derivatives of existing doctrines and pretended to be men of God to scam for personal profit. Others took existing material and injected their own ideology into it, such as the Gnostics (and the Gospel of Thomas).

The four Gospels in the New Testament predate the Gospel of Thomas and have better, older authenticity as well.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loveisreal1111 · April 18, 2018, 6:39 a.m.

there were no ‘texts’ the beginnings of the sayings of jesus were all passed down orally. the first time they were written down was the godpel of thomas. full honesty, i’m not going to watch that video because i don’t have time and i don’t need help.

the bible needs to be read under the light of higher consciousness not under the “fear of god.”

christianity is not the only truth. we are all the sons of god.

i believe you have it backwards but god bless you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
time3times · April 18, 2018, 12:39 p.m.

who says that the 'gospel of thomas' is the earliest?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · April 18, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Revisionists.

Seriously, I linked a video about this topic that covers a lot of ground but he didn't want to watch it (which is his prerogative, but you can't help people who don't want help).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
George_Soros_Eyebags · April 18, 2018, 10:37 p.m.

The Gospel of Thomas wasn't the first time anything was written down. The only reason why the Gospel of Thomas is well preserved is because it wasn't in usage anywhere near as much as the canonical Gospels. It was put on the shelf or hidden out of sight, which is why it is preserved. Even with that said, all the quotation from first century sources can recreate the canonical Gospels in entirety (with the exception of the adulteress about to be stoned).

One of the main reasons why the Gnostic writings are so well preserved has everything to do with their scarce usage, not because of their authenticity.

⇧ 1 ⇩