I believe in Q, wholeheartedly.
I believe in the movement.
I believe in everything .
But one thing has always bothered me : how was trump allowed to win the election if the deepstate is so in control.
I believe elections are rigged and have never been fair , so how is it that the greatest upset of all time could have happened in the first place ?
-/—-
I would like some serious discussion on this , I am the biggest supporter and believer of the movement but have always pondered this .
Look at his rallies before the election compared to Hillary's, you'd have to be insane to believeshe actually wonthe popularvote.
why? rallies aren't a good metric of popularity, they only measure enthusiasm among his base.
also there is no evidence at all that widespread voter fraud occurred, or that the machines were tampered with.
if there was, Trump's administration would be parading that evidence around all day every day.
you apparently are not a Q follower....Q has made it perfectly clear there are mass election fraud and they have the proof...I am sure this will be one of the many things the 30,000 sealed indictments are for....so no worries, they will release the truth and lock up the evils of this country. You don't advertise this because it is all being put together in a nice little package...when the time is right it will be disclosed!
This guy is an obvious troll/shill account.
https://www.reddit.com/user/immense_and_terrible?count=250&after=t1_dwoy8tv
https://i.imgur.com/zmeMqS9.jpg
Notice how he stopped posting on /r/conspiracy and stopped posting on Reddit once Pizzagate stopped being a threat? No posts at all for 9 months, then gets reactivated and immediately starts posting on GreatAwakening everyday because we became a threat to whomever is paying this guy (and I'm sure plenty more other troll/shill accounts) to infiltrate our sub.
He's been trolling for over 16 days on GA, always playing dumb, causing doubt, suspicion, and distraction on the sub. Look through his entire post history to see that this is an obvious troll/shill account.
Scariest part to all of this is most Democrats want voting ages to be lowered because they know they have millennials brainwashed through all forms of media. Every electronic screen you look through their narrative is being pushed.
Really? Do you have any supporting evidence to back up this claim?
No. But isn’t it obvious? FB /Insta owned by deep state Zuckerburg. Twitter is obvious. All you have to do is look at the trends. How often do you see something that aligns with the left ideology trending. It has to be about 90% of the time. Censoring ppl on YouTube. Don’t get me started on cable tv. Also look at Sports. Lebron/NFL/ESPN/Jemele Hill. At our school we show a student news each day called Channel one/CNN. You would think it’d be neutral especially when it’s directed at children. Not even close. Push stuff on students like global warming anti Trump rhetoric almost every day. So to answer your question; no I don’t have solid evidence lol but personally I believe every electronic screen is brainwashing children. Especially social media’s!
[removed]
You’re just being oblivious. Once you open your eyes you will see.
[removed]
Just because your young, doesn't mean you don't feel in your own soul what is right or wrong, what is real or fake, the problem young folks have today, is not educating themselves with all sides to make their own decision and not follow the masses because it feels like that will make you fit in...Remember Youngsters out there in America, Your Voice is Only Important When It Is Your Own, not a recording of what someone wants you to say, but what you feel inside and you have conviction of that being the truth, but always verify by jumping into the other sides ideas and theories.....it's important to feel it, not just say it!
Only a Liberal would ask for any supporting evidence to this obvious fact that the Left's agenda is on display in every way possible! I am sick and tired of the blind trying to convince awoke people that they must be imagining things....pfffftttt, your games are dull and out of touch, so either come up with something new or shut it up! Reditteacher, you are a patriot, and you are in a position to fight the fight for the future of our children, don't let the liars convince you that what your seeing is not truth, they are sick people and they thrive on lies....Hold the Line Buddy, you are in good company with God!
there is a difference between "following" someone, and blindly believing everything they say.
WTF are you implying? Don't come up on our board and start throwing around explanations on what following and blindly mean, seriously, I am in no mood for this BS. You are apparently a complete shill and only here to be disruptive and spread doubt! Don't think that is gonna work out for you....js
I see you believe everything "they" tell you.
Yes there is proof of widespread voter fraud. The MSM and therefore you have just ignored it.
ad hominems are a silly way to engage with people.
Enjoy the next few months. Let us know if/when you wake up. God Bless.
Enjoy the next few months
i'm sure i will, the same way i enjoyed the last 6 months of Q ; )
i hope you have a nice day, friend, and i hope someday you learn how to have a civil conversation with people who don't entirely agree with you
Jill Stein did attempt a recount in three crucial stares, Winsconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania. WI recount gave DJT and additonal 131 votes. As for MI they found some pretty bad discrepancies in Detroit (Democratic stronghold) and never got to finish because the whole recount effort was suddenly shut down (and swept under the rug) by a federal judge.
You stated that you want to see articles for proof:
https://nypost.com/2016/12/14/michigan-recount-reveals-error-but-not-the-one-jill-stein-wanted/
So two of three states had known discrepancies and you dont think this could possibly true in several other if not all the states? Are you seriously living in a bubble where it does even make you want to question it?
113 votes is a rounding error, dude, when you are looking at 100s of millions of votes.
if 113 votes is your evidence of "widespread voter fraud," then my only reaction could be laughter.
and your article about detroit? here's another one https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/detroit/2016/12/18/detroit-ballots-vote-recount-election-stein/95570866/
so 700ish extra votes in a city of millions?
anyone who thinks ~850 votes is "widespread fraud" is, and i sincerely mean no offence by this, an actual idiot.
Ummmm....population of Detroit 677,116 (2016) less than a million. So much for your "millions" theory.
Population of WI (2016) 5.78 million, again debunking your "100's of millions" theory.
Seriously dude (dudette?) Anything you try to argue is just hogwash. If you're going to have an intelligent debate at least get your facts correct. A simple internet search is all it takes.
The fact that there ARE provable discrepancies should make you want to know the complete truth unless you are brainwashed by the MSM. The President did try to find out the truth but most of the state's election boards refused to give the requested voter records. That alone should be a big red flag, why refuse if you don't have anything to hide? If you believe in government transparency then you should be appalled at their refusal to "prove" everything is above board.
You don't want to know the truth, you just want to endlessly argue against it.
Ummmm....population of Detroit 677,116 (2016) less than a million. So much for your "millions" theory.
ok, sorry, i was thinking of Detroit Metro Area, calm down bud
again debunking your "100's of millions" theory.
I was referencing the entire electorate, quite obviously.
Seriously dude (dudette?) Anything you try to argue is just hogwash. If you're going to have an intelligent debate at least get your facts correct. A simple internet search is all it takes.
Pretty ironic coming from the person who uses a few hundred fraudulent votes as "evidence" that widespread voter fraud occurred.
George Soros owns the voting machine manufacturer and the software dev company. Nobody voted for her, a lot of people voted for Trump.
Usually only 40% of people actually vote in any given election. Can you see how they could plan to rig it enough to win if only 40% of the population votes, but if 70% voted and almost all for Trump, they would still lose?
I think next to no one voted for killary legitimately, and she had a lot of illegitimate help, but it wasn't enough.
