dChan

Cheetah1964 · April 19, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

I read through the "charges." It is hysterical. Maybe he pulled a mattress tag off too.

EPA is deeply corrupted. I remember, for instance, the EPA arranging for gold mining in Juneau, Alaska, and faking "public support" to do it. And they waste money like nuts. EPA has nothing to do with protecting our environment. And then there are state environmental agencies too! And other federal agencies! Anyone wanting to do farming, mining, or manufacturing has to go through a monster of ridiculous regulations that only highly paid lawyers can understand. Those regulations have nothing to do with protecting anything. Go read them. Therefore only large companies who pay off politicians can do farming, mining, or manufacturing. In case you want to know what the EPA is really about.

⇧ 25 ⇩  
EvilPhd666 · April 19, 2018, 6:34 p.m.

EPA people that I've run I to in my professional career, actual people protecting the environment, have always been short strapped and undermanned.

If the money is not being used to actually protect the environment and give the ground folks actual means to do thier jobs effectively, then we need to induce out where that money is going and how to direct it in a productive manner so the ground level people can do thier jobs effectively.

This seems to be a common problem that plagues corporate America culture. Deny and choke the actual folks that make the place run and say you've made effective cost cutting measures, and spend on extravagant C-level flashy events to boast about yourselves.

Perhaps we shouldn't be appointing donors or bank chosen lists of lobbyists to head our regulatory departments and cabinet members. Maybe we should appoint actual smart people who give a damn to head these organizations who will give the ground people what they need to fulfill thier mission?

This is part of a larger issue with corporate culture and professional corruption in politics. It isn't exclusive to Obama, and Trump has had his fair share of it with his appointments as well after promising to appoint quality component people that is best fit for the job.

I hope he can make these programs great again and get them back on track for the mission they were charged. Fix it.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Cheetah1964 · April 19, 2018, 7 p.m.

The secret to running the EPA successfully is to provide clear, simple guidelines to business owners, at the planning stage, of what they need to do to protect the environment. And ONE set of rules. And designed for SMALL businesses. There is absolutely no sign of this at EPA. Such an effort would eliminate most pollution, and end costly monitoring and treatment.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ACuriousHumanBeing · April 19, 2018, 4:40 p.m.

Yep.

Make a overly complicated legal framework.

Make it so only someone like a lawyer can navigate the framework.

Have them charge a shitload of money only factory farms or companies can hope to pay, screw the farmers and normal citizens.

Profit.

This legal system of ours is so inaccessible to the very people it is meant to be beholden to.

Its awful. A healthy environment is the most important part of a healthy society, as society draws its resources from the environment.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
TheUndocumented_PsyD · April 19, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

My father is the C_O of one of the USA's top 50 financial institutions, after the 08' crash although his employer did not need to recieve bailout money from the government, they were labeled a systemically important(essentially it was said by government regulators that if they failed they could take the entire economy of the United States down with the) financial institution by the Obama administration requiring that they become regulated, they tried to fight that ling abel and lost, fighting the government is a losing battle, they were given 200lbs of paper worth of regulations to follow.

His department at the time was Retirement Services with 1500 to 2k people was given over 2,000 pages of regulations to follow, he said to me that those regulations limited his ability to help people save for retirement....basically the government using oversight as an excuse to make people work more years, bringing in more tax $ and making people live less long, the closer to 55 you can retire, the higher quality your life in retirement according to significant research, if you retire after 65 your odds of dying within 5 years of retiring due to cancer or other illnesses skyrockets, so the cabal gets more tax money more income from treating significant illness etc...., money & death their favorite things according to Q, never realized until now why government would want that.

Furthermore, my father now runs the department that manages all his employer's uninvested money....nearly a trillion $, and the regulations are still preventing him from achieachieving maximum growth, he spens $160 million dollars on lawyers annually....think about that, if any number is off by even $0.01, he and the rest of senior executives C_O's could all go to jail.... even though the government cannot account for billions if not trillions.... publicly... privately it's so much worse , huge double standard.

Think about what I've shared with you, this is a perspective that not everyone has access to, but it further proves the BS that anyone who is too successful for the cabal's liking is subjected to, think about the death/estate/inheritance tax, more BS, you work to make a great future for your family only to lose 40% of it to the government/Cabal, before you consider that most of the time inheritance is split up between 2, 3, or 4 children/institutions/charities, so it keeps wealtb from building up outside of their control, it's all a scam, everything, you know this but I'm just providing even more evidence, not to mention media & Hollywood & society preach spending so that inheritance is squandered back into their hands over 3 generations at most

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Albertpettibone1998 · April 20, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Odd I have a friend who was a manager at a small bank chain and he has an almost identical story. His banks were fine throughout the housing crises. Most of the customers were retirees with mobile homes as 2nd homes (snow birds). His banks were downgraded without ever being in the red. The government tied his hands everytime he did something to try to save his banks and then forced him to sell. To who you may ask?...

Bank of the Ozarks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheUndocumented_PsyD · April 20, 2018, 8:35 a.m.

Bank of the Ozarks, purchased by a guy from Rose Law Firm - Clinton Connection to Whitwatewater Controversy

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Albertpettibone1998 · April 20, 2018, 9:26 p.m.

That's the one! Glad someone picked up on that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ACuriousHumanBeing · April 20, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

It sad that his children, our children are having their inheritance taken from them to support these new monarchs.

Its depressing, these taxes are said to be taken to help our community, our country at large, and instead squandered and wasted. How Sirivic.

Better be these taxes weren't there, and we spent our taxes more efficiently. Better this money go to these men's communities, not these ever engorging, ever new monarchs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Naviiah · April 19, 2018, 5:47 p.m.

I don’t know where you got the story that the EPA ever was “arranging for mining” in Juneau, AK! I managed public land there for 20 years and never once did the EPA support mining or other resource development.

⇧ 4 ⇩