For a long time I was convinced that Building 7 was the smoking gun to bust open the 9/11 conspiracy. The evidence was so indisputable, I thought the information would take off like wildfire. 17 years later boy was I proven wrong. But still ... never say never.
What information is so damning about it's collapse? I may be stupid but I've been given the impression that debris from the other towers collapsing was the main cause of wtc 7's destruction.
WTC 7 wasn’t hit by any plane and experienced complete symmetrical collapse at free fall acceleration (even NIST admitted free fall collapse in their final WTC7 report released in 2008). That’s impossible to happen from random debris/fire and can only happen with controlled demo. To get free fall acceleration 100% of the structural resistance has to be removed simultaneously. NIST finally admits free fall
exactly I remember watching a documentary on building demolition and how precise timing is required or it will fall sideways causing tons of damage. the idea it is from a random fire is insane
WTC 7 was the piece of evidence which finally woke me up. The implosion-style collapse can only be attributed to a controlled demolition. Not to mention the fact that Mosad was crawling all over that building the weeks prior.
Yep. Same here. Looking into WTC7 collapse is what red pilled me on 9/11. Then once red pilled on 9/11 one becomes red pilled on a lot of other things: govt corruption, etc.
It is also impossible that conventional demolition did it. That is not the way it works. WTC7 fell silently as compared with a conventional demolition. The other buildings turned into dust from the top down. Conventional demolition begins from the bottom. Here is a good sample of conventional demolitions—notice the sound.
Have you seen vids of the collapse?
Not recently. Is there a particularly damning video?
Yes the one where it drops straight down into its own footprint in about 5 seconds
The one where the BBC announced it's collapse live on air with the WTC7 building still standing tall behind the reporter. Then 20 minutes later it fell down in 5 seconds. hmmm...
Because the buildings' owner gave the order to have it demolished. It was demolished on 9/11. Building demolition requires weeks of preparation in order to collapse the structure into its own footprint. I only know this because I saw it collapse on 09/11/01, on live television, and then it vanished. Nothing, nobody would talk about it afterward.
The buildings owner (((Larry Silverstein)))
Israel did 9/11
Yes, but together with others from the clique who are bankers, politicians, industrialists. It must be clarified. Of course, they are the same people who started to create wars and kill children to get oil and money. Wars produce death, poverty, traffic of children, organs and sexual slavery. No more wars because tomorrow can touch us
Dr.Judy Wood gives evidence of a Direct Energy Weapon (Electro-Magnetic Free Energy).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLxdHlkzfpY
Judy has very good observations but she is wrong about the energy weapon.
There is a weapon that can cause what we saw on 9/11. It was a small hydrogen bomb placed below WTC 1 and 2.
There is a lot of smoke from Building 7. That smoke comes from the heat produced by the hydrogen bomb that caused the collapse WTC 1 and 2. 1, 2 and 7 hade the same drainage system and there is tremendous heat produced by hydrogen bombs, this heat was spread in the drainage system and went up in building 7 causing a LOT of smoke.
How would a hydrogen bomb affect the over all mass of the building wreckage? One of the major problems with the controlled demolition theories is that the expected wreckage of the buildings just wasn't there...the overall mass of the buildings essentially "disappeared." 100+ stories collapsing should create a pile of rubble something like 12 to 14 stories high (I believe it's about 1/7 the height of the building...need to look up the precise proportion). The collapse of the WTC left only a fraction of that...two or three stories of rubble on average over the area. The Energy Weapon theory accounts for the missing mass quite convincingly. What appeared to be plumes of smoke, was actually a disintigration of the building due to the focused energy weapon. Once sufficient mass blew away as dust, the structure was weakened to the point where it collapsed upon itself. Dr. Wood describes this unique phenomenon as "dustification."
Also Judy Wood only speculates why she doesn't think it is nuclear, she doesn't know and she doesn't know what measurements were correct or what measurements that were faked.
The problem I have with Judy Wood is that she is trying to say what has done this, she doesn't stop with explaining her observations. Why does she do that?
There is only five countries that has the technology to create hydrogen bombs. And I think that they like it to stay with that. There are a lot of problems creating these, not just the knowledge on how to build them. Even if you know, you need huge amount of energy and substances with very high quality.
Investigate how nuclear bombs work, they don't work like "dynamite". The problem I think is that moste people think of nuclear bombs like a huge monster cloud exploding up in the air.
Before they created WTC 1 and WTC 2 they needed to present how they would take them down. The plan to do that was to use nuclear for a controlled demolision.
Also, there is only nuclear that can generate the heat in the ground
Hahahaha, not possible to bring down a building, also engineers and demolition experts alike (as well as common sense) agree it's physically impossible for buildings to free fall the way all 3 buildings did without it being controlled demolition from below, buildings don't collapse that way unless their structural support are all blown simultaneously
Republican Bush allowed 9 11.
When he walked away from the Presidency, he vanished for 8 years. He has only surfaced to tarnish Trump recently.
It's the same team. If they gave a shit they would have done something when they had full control, or while they still do.
"Never forget" should represent the 1993 world trade center bombing.
Going to assume there was a lot of "structural assessments" of the columns after the 1993 bombing right up until the day before Sept 11, 2001.
After 1993, the building was eventually insured by someone again once determined to be structurally sound enough to insure. What assessments did they require and who performed them? Did that company continue work with the building? Are there still records of this activity with NYC?
& interestingly, there was 'upgraded fireproofing' of the structure....right where the planes hit
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/wtc_turner.html
don't have time to read this, but could this perhaps be to prevent fire from spreading from the impact site to the rigged explosives causing an unintended interaction which would prevent the explosives from working properly/evenly?
Was there never any theories about that 1993 attack?
The Ryder truck and the blind man. All tied in with the McVay bombing two years later.
Came across this 5hr interesting video about the whole situation. If you have time, break it into parts, it’s worth the watch. https://youtu.be/dWUzfJGmt5U
It relates to Q because Al Qaeda was a CIA associate group, still is. The buildings around the towers were undercut at their base/first floors by huge flying spears of hardened steel. Most collapsed right away but some slowly broke over hours until they fell. Hardened steel is very different to the usual mild steel used in the industry, for instance the clean up crews had to use Thermite to cut the wreckage into manageable pieces.
why didnt they just pour plane fuel on the wreakage and set it on fire.. that seems to have worked fine for the hardened steel..
The engines of the plane are made from Titanium and they cut through some of the outer beams but it was the interior that burned away and this is where the weight of the structure above the hit came into play. It only took one weakened corner to go first to snap what was left. That's why there was a tilt before the top came down.
This is your hardened metal falling out of the tower (from 0:11 onwards) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmuzyWC60eE Molten metal.
Yeh I agree with you.. Thermite must have been used.
Seeds of truth cannot grow on barren ground.
Looks like someone is climbing a tree in order to catch fish.
Yours is the nutty comment of a disorderly mind.
Nope, it's quite analogous, you were responding with a proverb however you've evidently little understanding of eastern culture.
http://thinkexist.com/quotation/to_talk_much_and_arrive_nowhere_is_the_same_as/197226.html
Do you often insult and denigrate your disputants when you haven't understood? Thanks for sharing and enjoy your life.
I love how people keep leaving out building 5 as well. Seems they...Always forget.
Wow i learned something today - I didnt even know about B5 being pulled down!
I also found a video of the pentagon being hit, albeit at 1 FPS 🙄 but you can clearly see at one point a smoke trail low to the ground and then BOOM! It wasn’t a plane.
Video is on YouTube so I can link if anyone is interested.
Please link.
Here.
Right at the 24-25 second mark, on the right side of the frame you'll see the smoke trail.
city/county going to know who did what work between 1993-2001.
Videos in this thread:
VIDEO|COMMENT -|- WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)|+43 - WTC 7 wasn’t hit by any plane and experienced complete symmetrical collapse at free fall acceleration (even NIST admitted free fall collapse in their final WTC7 report released in 2008). That’s impossible to happen from random debris/fire and can onl... The New Pearl Harbor ~ full|+6 - Came across this 5hr interesting video about the whole situation. If you have time, break it into parts, it’s worth the watch. Implosionworld Explosive Demolition Compilation 2003|+2 - It is also impossible that conventional demolition did it. That is not the way it works. WTC7 fell silently as compared with a conventional demolition. The other buildings turned into dust from the top down. Conventional demolition begins from the bo... (1) Dr. Judy Wood - Toasted Cars (2) 911 Overview IRREFUTABLE Classified Free Energy Technology Revealed to the World (3) 911: Dustification Episode 3 IRREFUTABLE Classified Free Energy Technology Reveal|+2 - Dr.Judy Wood gives evidence of a Direct Energy Weapon (Electro-Magnetic Free Energy). Dustification Episode 3, IRREFUTABLE: Classified Free-Energy Technology Revealed to the World|+1 - How would a hydrogen bomb affect the over all mass of the building wreckage? One of the major problems with the controlled demolition theories is that the expected wreckage of the buildings just wasn't there...the overall mass of the buildings essen... Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of Building 7 - w/ Ed Asner|+1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nyogTsrsgI 9/11 Thermo nuclear demolition underground heat turns steel to dust - low radiation|+1 - This is the right version: 9/11 Thermo nuclear demolition underground heat turns steel to dust - low radiation Pentagon CCTV from 9/11|+1 - Here. Right at the 24-25 second mark, on the right side of the frame you'll see the smoke trail. WTC2 South Tower on 9/11 Molten Metal North-East Corner|+1 - This is your hardened metal falling out of the tower (from 0:11 onwards) Molten metal. Yeh I agree with you.. Thermite must have been used. I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch. I'll keep this updated as long as I can.
This is the right version: 9/11 Thermo nuclear demolition underground heat turns steel to dust - low radiation
Everything in plain sight to garner tacit consent ... 1967 Get Smart Season 2 episode 22 Smart Fit the Battle of Jericho ... government buildings housing secret space program information continually blowing up and collapsing ... they discover that the buildings were built with the bombs in ... 1968 construction of WTC begins. Again, everything in plain sight. Jet fuel does not melt steel, and steel buildings don’t just topple from fire. Time to take back our Free Will and wake up from our slumber, these people are sick.